Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Poll: Aperture or Portability?
Poll Options
Aperture or Portability?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 01-02-2008, 08:01 PM
Rodstar's Avatar
Rodstar (Rod)
The Glenfallus

Rodstar is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty P View Post
Rod, how much does the "Mary Rose" weigh fully loaded?
Matty,

In short, I am not sure.

Judging by the weights listed for a comparable scope from Obsession, the mirror box is about 46kg, but weighs only 11 kgs in real terms when being wheeled along with the wheelbarrow handles. The secondary cage weighs about 5kg, and I would judge the truss poles to be about 15 kgs.

I have a locking mechanism that allows me to wheel the scope fully set up. It feels perhaps 50% heavier than when I wheel the mirror box alone, so I would estimate an approximate effective weight of about 15 kgs when wheeling it.

It is not light, but by the same token, surprisingly easy to manoevre after a few goes.

I might also mention that I used to own a 10 inch LX200 SCT, and the Mary Rose is MUCH easier to manovre except when I need to get the Mary Rose in and out of the trailer (in that instance I use ramps when no one is around to help, but prefer to find a lifting buddy and manually lift it out!). The LX200 was awkward to carry out from the house to the tripod, and on a couple of occasions, I nearly stumbled over! Heart-stopping stuff!!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-02-2008, 09:20 PM
CoombellKid
Registered User

CoombellKid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,590
As long as I'm fit enough to move it aperture get's my vote. Although I still
need to get the aperture.

regards,CS
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-02-2008, 11:34 PM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
I bought a 16" with lofty ideas to disassemble it and chuck it in the car. Hasn't happened yet

It is very easy to use though in my backyard, it's on wheels and I leave it permanently assembled. Collimation aside I can have it pointing up in 30secs but the bugger is my backyard has a very limited view of west and a light polluted view of north
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-02-2008, 06:25 AM
abellhunter's Avatar
abellhunter
Registered User

abellhunter is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 119
A P E R T U R E !

Hey Astro Heads!

i can't stand the city! So why would i have to move a scope around? BECAUSE MY DARK SITE BECAME THE ~ C I T Y ~!

___________________________________ ______________________
"Astronomers Worst Nightmare!" see post #17
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=28124
___________________________________ ______________________

All that said, it's allways been ~ A P E R T U R E ! The BIGGER THE BETTER!

___________________________________ ___________________
Large Group Scope &/or The new OZ Observatory/Retreat plan [see post #35]
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=27969
___________________________________ _____________________

Aperture Rules! Lance aka "abellhunter"

http://www.anzaobservatory.com
...is Moving to the Southern Hemisphere any ideas, suggestions or comments?

humphreys@greencafe.com
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (100-0028_IMG.JPG)
66.7 KB11 views
Click for full-size image (100-0022_IMG.JPG)
51.4 KB12 views
Click for full-size image (anzaobservatory1.JPG)
163.9 KB16 views
Click for full-size image (24RC_Truss.jpe)
73.4 KB23 views
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 18-02-2008, 08:15 PM
citivolus's Avatar
citivolus (Ric)
Refracted

citivolus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carindale
Posts: 1,178
I must say that after getting the C9.25 on a GEM, the OTA is 10x as portable as my 10" LX200 was. I suspect that I could get a C14 and it would still be about the same level of portability as my other scope was.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-03-2008, 09:50 PM
Inmykombi's Avatar
Inmykombi (Geoff)
They aint just doubles :o

Inmykombi is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Gosford NSW Australia
Posts: 2,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by abellhunter View Post
Hey Astro Heads!

i can't stand the city! So why would i have to move a scope around? BECAUSE MY DARK SITE BECAME THE ~ C I T Y ~!

___________________________________ ______________________
"Astronomers Worst Nightmare!" see post #17
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=28124
___________________________________ ______________________

All that said, it's allways been ~ A P E R T U R E ! The BIGGER THE BETTER!

___________________________________ ___________________
Large Group Scope &/or The new OZ Observatory/Retreat plan [see post #35]
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=27969
___________________________________ _____________________

Aperture Rules! Lance aka "abellhunter"

http://www.anzaobservatory.com
...is Moving to the Southern Hemisphere any ideas, suggestions or comments?

humphreys@greencafe.com

I know where I am off to for my next holiday.......WOW and WOW again.


___________________________________ __________________________


Back to the question at hand.

I had the need for aperture and went from an 8 inch Newt. to a 10 inch SCT.

I love it, but if I want anything bigger in a go-to SCT I will need to eat more "weet-bix" for energy.

My 10 inch is manageable for me, and can be transported very easily in its JMI case. But I can imagine the 12 inch being very heavy indeed and less portable.

Another difficulty is that I dont have a good viewing horizon from my home. Too many darn trees....So I have to take the scope to more remote sites.

I also may opt for a second scope to grab and set up for a quick fix at home, and then take " my baby" for a drive when we meet on the mountain.

fifty fifty for me....maybe aperture wins by a smidgen....
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-03-2008, 04:46 PM
JimmyH155
Registered User

JimmyH155 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Burpengary
Posts: 619
I had to vote for portability. My Meade LX100 (8") with steel tripod is heavy enough even when all I do is lug it out of the shed. I carry the tripod out first then have to grab the OTA and lift really high to put it on the mount.
As some of youses have said, my little grab 'n go 90mm Celestron refractor gets lots of use - I can carry the lot out with one shoulder, plonk it anywhere to dodge the tree / street light / dog mess, and hey presto, ready for action. Even M42 looks good in it.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-03-2008, 04:46 PM
skies2clear
Registered User

skies2clear is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 238
I want the largest aperture I can manage, so that means both in my book.

So, what's the largest aperture that is portable?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-03-2008, 04:58 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by skies2clear View Post
So, what's the largest aperture that is portable?
It really depends on how much weight you can carry or pull.

I'd say that a 12" SCT would be fairly easy to move around.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-03-2008, 09:10 PM
Domol's Avatar
Domol (Domenic)
Bring on the night!

Domol is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dingley Village
Posts: 162
I think a celestron 11 inch on a CG5 (EQ Setup), breaks down well and fits into my wagon boot ok (room for luggage too). Only takes 15 min to assemble, and heaviest component is 13kg tube. You want to drive the car to where you set up, otherwise it's a chore. I'm lazy at the best of times, but it's acceptable to me. I had a 6inch Newton before that was almost grab and go, but i'd prefer the extra work on set up for the better view!
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 08-03-2008, 12:54 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by skies2clear View Post
I want the largest aperture I can manage, so that means both in my book.

So, what's the largest aperture that is portable?
Depends on your definition of portable.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (SV4000071.JPG)
66.3 KB16 views
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-03-2008, 09:20 PM
Screwdriverone's Avatar
Screwdriverone (Chris)
I have detailed files....

Screwdriverone is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kellyville Ridge, NSW Australia
Posts: 3,306
portability in my case coz my budget only stretches so far and because the neighbours always seem to turn on their porchlights at 4am ;((

Chris
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement