Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > ATM and DIY Projects
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-06-2008, 10:01 PM
yagon's Avatar
yagon
less computer, more stars

yagon is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: N Sydney, Seal Rocks, other remote...
Posts: 171
Seeking Australian telescope maker for custom reflector

I'd like to build the scope of my dreams: a portable/truss 10" ~f7 EQ mount reflector. The following links illustrate the type of scope I seek:

I very much like this philosophy towards reflectors:
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthrea...l/fpart/1/vc/1

The following designs from Royce are the closest to what I'm seeking, particularly because they incorporate top quality design/optics into a relatively portable package:
http://www.rfroyce.com/mynewt.htm
http://www.rfroyce.com/newtonian8f8.htm

I also like the obsession 15UC for its portability, but it's too big for my requirements and it's not optimised for planetary/lunar observation:
http://www.obsessiontelescopes.com/t..._UC/index.html

My problem is, I don't have the time, space, equipment and skills to build a scope like this. However, I am willing to pay someone to build it for me.

Is there anyone in Australia who could build such a scope for me?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-06-2008, 10:31 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
You just missed by a week someone who had a truss design 12" which was on sale for months!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-06-2008, 10:51 AM
Satchmo's Avatar
Satchmo
Registered User

Satchmo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,883
1O" and under scopes for planetary are ok if you don't mind black and white views of the planets at higher magnifications ( as the image is too dim) to excite colour vision.

There is simply no subtitute for aperture and light gathering. A 12" F5 will be a far superior planatary instrument than an 8" F8. Long focal length instruments just had better reputations 30 years ago because they had so little departure from a sphere and there was less skill about to make faster mirrors for the amateur. A slight difference in central obstruction between different F ratios is nothing compared to the importance of smooth optical surface.

As far as I know theres a S/H 12" F6 conical mirror available here
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=31474

Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-06-2008, 04:17 PM
tnott's Avatar
tnott
Oblonnygox

tnott is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 221
I agree, the effect of central obstruction is negligible compared to the increase in aperture, especially if it is a good mirror.

http://legault.club.fr/obstruction.html
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement