Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
|
Thanks Marc. The artifacts were more obvious starless, thats why

. I took RGB for stars, but they looked big and messy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal
Hi Fred,
I googled the target & I couldn't find a picture anywhere near as good.
Well done.
cheers
Allan
|
Thanks Allan. Some others are good, but mostly just bright red mono (Ha) or bicolour.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
A phenomenal image, well worth the effort. Its like an amateur first.
Greg.
|
Thanks Greg. Well, 1st, no , but possibly unique in that I took Ha, SII and OIII. Interestingly, IMO, the AAO pic is very ordinary, but that was with film.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
Well done, Fred! Someone has to have a go at these things. It's not a stunning object but it still shows some interesting detail and colour and you have a unique image.
Cheers,
Rick.
|
Thanks for not looking tooo close Rick

. I think I perform an important public duty

, like you say, someone has to do it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJT
Hi Fred. Love the image. If you have the kit and location you may as well go for the hard to do objects because as you say, no one else is. Well worth it in my view.
Top job 
|
Thanks David, yes, the ability to do the hours tempts me I must say.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SimmoW
That looks excellent, nice details considering the faint target
|
Thanks Simon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy01
Not much to say that does it justice but all hail the Narrowband king!
We are unworthy to stand in your presence master
Just awesome, 72 hrs? Is that a record? Wow!
|
Oii Andy, easy with that, or Ill start likin that kinda talk

. The likes of yourselves and a few others have certainly raised the bar seriously lately

.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashDrive
Very nice indeed ... great colours ... a top capture..
Col....
|
Thanks Col
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonardo70
Wonderful result.
All the best,
Leo
|
Thanks Leo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese
You are the mega king Fred. Lots of detail in your image. Not sure about the colour palette, but that is my taste talking here. I am just wondering if you have a couple of subs there that are a little less sharp than the bulk? The focus looks slightly soft to me on the full res.
|
Thanks Paul. I tried some other palettes, bright red looks good, had to pick just one. The noise was very high, so smoothing was required and loss of sharpness. Ive noticed a few rock stars would rather leave backgrounds a bit gritty rather than smooth and process the hell out of images. I must say that can look much better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Great stuff Freddo  lots of exposure as usual and it does look deep, Steve Crouch did a nice one of this with his old 12.5" RCOS too
Mike
|
Thanks Mike. Yes Steves is good, hes done a lot of hard ones over many years. He was the 1st for many.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus
Fantastic, Fred,
This sort of image would have been utterly impossible a generation ago. I really believe it is worth the effort - the superbubble is special and you've caught it. You've really got the SII nicely.
What is RA/Dec and angular diameter?
Best,
Mike
|
Thanks Mike, the SII was a hard part, extremely noisy. Others have skipped SII altogether and used Ha for red.
RA: 5hr 43m 15s
Distance: 170,000 Image Size: 33' x 33'
DEC: -67d 54m 7s