ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
First Quarter 47.4%
|
|

23-04-2017, 09:58 AM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
Newton the next telescope.
I think the Hubble Space Telescope should have been named The Issac Newton Telescope to give recognition to that great man.
Well the reasons are obvious ...the man was a genius above any other before or after.
The Hubble scope is after all a Newtonian telescope and although we here know who invented that scope many would not I expect.
How would NASA placed the Hubble in space without Newtons laws on gravity.
How would NASA do any thing in space without Newtons Gravity?
And does not General Relativity use Newtons Gravity.
And on a side note it ticks me off when folk talking about GR say Newton was wrong and I have even seen a video where Newton is portrayed as a fool.
His math, invented calculus I think, the gold standard his work on optics and I bet there is much more.
NASA should do something name something to pit that great genius on a pedestal...
Alex
|

23-04-2017, 10:06 AM
|
 |
Rocky Peak Observatory
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kandos NSW
Posts: 536
|
|
G'day Alex, I agree with everything you said about Isaac Newton, but naming the HST as such would cause a bit of confusion with the existing Isaac Newton Telescope, currently on the Canary Islands and formerly in the UK Royal Greenwich Observatory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton_Telescope
|

23-04-2017, 10:16 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 818
|
|
Newton was English, Hubble American.
Countries tend to name significant things after their own folk, not foreign nationals.
Can you think of anything in Oz named after someone other than an Aussie?
That's your answer, Alex!
Dean
|

23-04-2017, 10:23 AM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by okiscopey
G'day Alex, I agree with everything you said about Isaac Newton, but naming the HST as such would cause a bit of confusion with the existing Isaac Newton Telescope, currently on the Canary Islands and formerly in the UK Royal Greenwich Observatory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton_Telescope
|
Thanks I feel better but I really want more.
Alex
|

23-04-2017, 10:28 AM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanm
Newton was English, Hubble American.
Countries tend to name significant things after their own folk, not foreign nationals.
Can you think of anything in Oz named after someone other than an Aussie?
That's your answer, Alex!
Dean
|
Thanks for trying to help Dean.
There would be a few things...how about Queen Victoria building?
Alex
|

23-04-2017, 10:34 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 818
|
|
Good call Alex: but back in those days, Ozzies were English, and Victoria (like Liz today) was the 'Sovereign Queen of Australia' - we were just a dominion of The Empire.
We didn't become our own nation until 1901 (and even then, we were the 'Commonwealth of Australia').
Dean
|

23-04-2017, 11:46 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
|
|
The Yanks have a biscuit named the "Fig Newton". So obviously the name is copyright, trademarked, or a portion thereof. I wonder if anyone has taken "Fig Newtons" into space?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newtons_(cookie)
|

23-04-2017, 12:07 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
|
|
Quote:
And does not General Relativity use Newtons Gravity.
And on a side note it ticks me off when folk talking about GR say Newton was wrong and I have even seen a video where Newton is portrayed as a fool.
|
Very true Alex.
Here is what Einstein said about Newton's theory of gravity.
Quote:
No one must think that Newton’s great creation can be overthrown in any real sense by this [Theory of Relativity] or by any other theory. His clear and wide ideas will for ever retain their significance as the foundation on which our modern conceptions of physics have been built.
|
Here is a terrible thought.
With anti science governments in power and NASA's budget being slashed, NASA may need to rely more on private enterprise funding that will have a say in the naming rights for missions.
Imagine say in the year 2030 the "Microsoft Windows 700" space telescope is launched or the "Ronald McDonald Hamburger Plus" space probe to the dwarf planet Eris.
Shocking to contemplate.
|

23-04-2017, 12:20 PM
|
 |
Oh, I See You Are Empty!
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laramie, WY - United States of America
Posts: 1,554
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave
The Hubble scope is after all a Newtonian telescope and although we here know who invented that scope many would not I expect.
|
Isn't the Hubble and R-C design? or am I mistaken?
|

23-04-2017, 12:34 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICURMT
Isn't the Hubble and R-C design? or am I mistaken?
|
You are absolutely correct - Hubble is an RC telescope.
|

23-04-2017, 01:36 PM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
Ó
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanm
Good call Alex: but back in those days, Ozzies were English, and Victoria (like Liz today) was the 'Sovereign Queen of Australia' - we were just a dominion of The Empire.
We didn't become our own nation until 1901 (and even then, we were the 'Commonwealth of Australia').
Dean
|
I realised that after I posted I though it would at least give me some time to come up with something else.
I can't its the only thing I have so I must contend ...but she wasn't really Australian, forget that part of her job description was to rule Australia she was British and therefore my example is even though not correct absolutely valid. 
Alex
|

23-04-2017, 01:46 PM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICURMT
Isn't the Hubble and R-C design? or am I mistaken?
|
You are correct but that does not mean you are right.
Part of it is a Newtonian mirror.
Anyways what does this have to do with his introduction of the gold standard.
Alex
|

23-04-2017, 01:47 PM
|
 |
Supernova Searcher
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave
Ó
I realised that after I posted I though it would at least give me some time to come up with something else.
I can't its the only thing I have so I must contend ...but she wasn't really Australian, forget that part of her job description was to rule Australia she was British and therefore my example is even though not correct absolutely valid. 
Alex
|
Good Try Alex   
Cheers
|

23-04-2017, 01:50 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 2,313
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanm
Newton was English, Hubble American.
Countries tend to name significant things after their own folk, not foreign nationals.
Can you think of anything in Oz named after someone other than an Aussie?
That's your answer, Alex!
Dean
|
Only Queensland, NSW and Tasmania off the top of my head lol
|

23-04-2017, 01:54 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 2,313
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanm
Good call Alex: but back in those days, Ozzies were English, and Victoria (like Liz today) was the 'Sovereign Queen of Australia' - we were just a dominion of The Empire.
We didn't become our own nation until 1901 (and even then, we were the 'Commonwealth of Australia').
Dean
|
I know it's confusing but commonwealth in this context doesn't refer to the British Commonwealth. For example, Massachusetts is still known as the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Commonwealth just refers to the collective ability to move forward as a nation.
Definition: an independent state or community, especially a democratic republic.
|

23-04-2017, 02:42 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCH
Only Queensland, NSW and Tasmania off the top of my head lol
|
Add to that; Perth, Darwin, Adelaide, Sydney, Melbourne, Hobart, Brisbane and Didjabringabeeralong...
|

23-04-2017, 02:48 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave
You are correct but that does not mean you are right.
Part of it is a Newtonian mirror.
Anyways what does this have to do with his introduction of the gold standard.
Alex
|
While it is true that Isaac Newton made a first reflecting telescope, I would disagree that Hubble is a Newtonian telescope. Isaac used a spherical mirror and a plane mirror in his design, while RC telescope utilises two hyperbolic mirrors. RC telescope was invented by George Ritchey and Henri Chretien and it is a different design altogether. Why not credit Egyptians for making the first mirrors?
|

23-04-2017, 05:11 PM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slawomir
While it is true that Isaac Newton made a first reflecting telescope, I would disagree that Hubble is a Newtonian telescope. Isaac used a spherical mirror and a plane mirror in his design, while RC telescope utilises two hyperbolic mirrors. RC telescope was invented by George Ritchey and Henri Chretien and it is a different design altogether. Why not credit Egyptians for making the first mirrors? 
|
Because they were not British and not Newton.
Well forget the telescope aspect let's focus upon gravity.
He invented gravity didn't he.
Alex
|

23-04-2017, 05:55 PM
|
Watch me post!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
|
|
Gday Alex
Quote:
He invented gravity didn't he.
|
Not sure he "invented" it, as it was around before he was ;-).
He merely came up with a mathematical model to describe it.
( and "merely" here is a slight understatement :-) )
Andrew
|

23-04-2017, 06:19 PM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewJ
Gday Alex
Not sure he "invented" it, as it was around before he was ;-).
He merely came up with a mathematical model to describe it.
( and "merely" here is a slight understatement :-) )
Andrew
|
Heck Andrew I can't take a trick.
Well if he didn't invent gravity who did?
Alex
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:02 PM.
|
|