I just got a 300mm F/2.8 lens on monday, And I've been at a bit of a loss as to how to mount it to my EQ6 Pro for some astro-snaps. With my 70-200 I just used the piggyback adapter on the top of the rings of my 6" refractor, however, due to the enormous weight in the 300mm, if i do that, when the mount rotates on the RA axis, the camera instantly just spins on its tripod colar and points straight towards the ground...
I was thinking of making an adapter out of some aluminum that would support around the sides of the colar that would prohibit rotation.. but thought I'd ask what other people do before I jump in the deep end...
Thanks for the ideas, however, its not the balancing that is a problem, its more, that the lens/camera rotate around and point down to the ground when the mount is not looking down due to the excessive weight in the frontal element. the tripod collars' foot does not have enough surface area to create enough friction to stop it rotating on the screw...
I plan to make a side by side setup for the camera+lens and guidescope, but that wont solve the problem of the lens rotating on the mounting screw..
Scary when they rotate around like that huh? In the nanosecond it takes, you envisage all that money hitting the ground, LOL.
Is the foot square or rectangular? If so, maybe make a braket that incorporates a detent the same shape and size, not as good as two screws, but it may help. The only other option I can think of without actually seeing the foot, is to drill and tap another mounting hole, giving two.
Gary
So its just slipping? Put some thing thin but grippy between the two faces but be careful you dont damage the thread on the camera mount. You may have to consider using one mounting ring for an approx 4" scope and mount that to a plate to hold the front of the lens and mount the camera body to the same plate. Hope that makes sense.
Gary, Hah.. scary? I damn near had 3 heart attacks in 2 seconds..
I had thought about making a plate that goes ontop of the dovebar that has a recessed section for the foot. Its rectangular, but only has one hole, and not enough room for a second really.
Monte, adding a ring at the front isnt a bad idea, I dont know how much clearance the front has over the end of the dovetail bar, Its not much.. I dont know if a ring will fit, but i suppose if i were to add an extention under the lenses foot, to bring it up another inch off the dovetail bar, that should give it all the clearance in the world.
Robin, That - may - work, but it would need at least a 4" ring at the front, and only a 70mm/80mm ring at the rear... starts to become expensive if im buying 2 sets of rings for it...
Robin, That - may - work, but it would need at least a 4" ring at the front, and only a 70mm/80mm ring at the rear... starts to become expensive if im buying 2 sets of rings for it...
I made a cradle out of 12mm MDF for the Sigma 300 2.8 I had. So the lens foot mount screwed into one end, and a felt lined ring held the front of the lens. Nice cheap solution.