Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-12-2022, 11:16 PM
Hodur (David)
Registered User

Hodur is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 86
Equipment Reviews

Reading equipment review is both educational and sheds light on the mysterious world of mounts and OTA.
There’s many an Optical expert within these pages. I’d love to read some new equipment reviews. After all the world of telescope optics has moved ahead in leaps and bounds just in the last couple of years.
So… I’m asking, for some of our knowledgeable colleagues too pen some reviews.
Thanking you in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-12-2022, 09:18 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hodur View Post
.... After all the world of telescope optics has moved ahead in leaps and bounds just in the last couple of years.
.....
I am curious what recent innovations you are referring to.

Sure, there have been a few new product releases, but as far as optical design is concerned I am not aware of any optical game changer or innovation that has not been around for many, many years.

Care to expand on what you had in mind?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-12-2022, 12:49 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,094
A couple of optical designs incorporated into amateur equipment that come to mind in the past 10 years as far as alternative design innovation
1/ RASA
2/ HyperStar

Not that I own or use them

Yes / No ?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-12-2022, 06:25 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is online now
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,975
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
I am curious what recent innovations you are referring to.

Sure, there have been a few new product releases, but as far as optical design is concerned I am not aware of any optical game changer or innovation that has not been around for many, many years.

Care to expand on what you had in mind?
He didn't say game changer..just moved ahead in leaps and bounds ...presumably little ones.

alex
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-12-2022, 08:31 PM
Hans Tucker (Hans)
Registered User

Hans Tucker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
I am curious what recent innovations you are referring to.

Sure, there have been a few new product releases, but as far as optical design is concerned I am not aware of any optical game changer or innovation that has not been around for many, many years.

Care to expand on what you had in mind?
Your AP RH308 wasn't a game changer when it was released? Started the revolution of fast imaging catadioptric. Prior to this the only fast imaging scope was the SCT's with the hyperstar.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-12-2022, 08:29 AM
AstroViking's Avatar
AstroViking (Steve)
Registered User

AstroViking is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,073
What about things like a "1 year with X" review?

I presume there are plenty of member looking at buying gear and want to know how it stands up to use, if there are any gremlins in it, and whether it's fit for purpose.

For example - I bought my SWED72 as a cheap way into astrophotography. It works really well for a scope in it's price range, but the focal length isn't really suitable for smaller DSOs such galaxies more than about 30M light years away.

Cheers,
V
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2022, 04:25 PM
Hodur (David)
Registered User

Hodur is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
I am curious what recent innovations you are referring to.

Sure, there have been a few new product releases, but as far as optical design is concerned I am not aware of any optical game changer or innovation that has not been around for many, many years.

Care to expand on what you had in mind?
One of the things that comes to mind are the Harmonic Drive mounts and the exotic OTA Riccardi-Honders astrograph available from Testar.
Also the story’s I love reading, average guy, average gear, achieving great results.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-12-2022, 05:52 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hodur View Post
One of the things that comes to mind are the Harmonic Drive mounts and the exotic OTA Riccardi-Honders astrograph available from Testar.
Also the story’s I love reading, average guy, average gear, achieving great results.
I guess I was being obtuse, but I'm pretty sure Klass Honders designed his astrograph back in the late 1970's/early 1980's and while there have been some excellent variations on his and other designs, much of this stuff has been around (albeit often not in amateur telescopes) for decades.

High precision optical shaft encoders have allowed things like harmonic drives, but in reality, how you spin a shaft is somewhat moot so long as it is accurate, smooth and rigid. This is not to say portability and weight savings of these drives are not useful...but they do throw the occasional curve ball if they lose power by going limp, or vibrating if not perfectly tuned when powered.

It is also worth mentioning if you put a renishaw or similar encoder into a standard mount drive you get the best of both worlds.....albeit at a price.

I guess the point I am making is changes in optics and mounts being offered to amateurs are evolutionary rather than revolutionary, with many high quality but older "classical" designs outperforming the latest marketing pitches.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-12-2022, 07:11 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is online now
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,975
Your are a big man and a decent man Peter...
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-12-2022, 08:37 PM
Hans Tucker (Hans)
Registered User

Hans Tucker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,462
Ok, I now the original thread post was calling for IIS Members reviews so apologies for going slightly off topic, not trying to hijack this thread.

I do like reading Ed Ting's scope reviews

https://www.scopereviews.com/index.html

and was a subscriber to Astronomy Technology Today magazine

https://astronomytechnologytoday.com/
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-12-2022, 08:59 PM
gaseous's Avatar
gaseous (Patrick)
Registered User

gaseous is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 786
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroViking View Post
What about things like a "1 year with X" review?

I presume there are plenty of member looking at buying gear and want to know how it stands up to use, if there are any gremlins in it, and whether it's fit for purpose.

For example - I bought my SWED72 as a cheap way into astrophotography. It works really well for a scope in it's price range, but the focal length isn't really suitable for smaller DSOs such galaxies more than about 30M light years away.

Cheers,
V
Great idea Steve, that would be very useful to a lot of people. I'll probably do one for the 20" Skywatcher dob soon.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement