ANZAC Day
Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 19-12-2024, 02:11 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by rustigsmed View Post
not so sure about that ... for PI purposes anyway..


fastest M4 benchmark - https://www.pixinsight.com/benchmark...X051MI27XK407Z (Total 26356)

fastest E5-2699 v3 (linux) - https://www.pixinsight.com/benchmark...N64CY8O8L08466 (Total 25992)
If you look into that benchmark - the dual Xeons are faster than the M4 - its the NVME drives that owner has paired them with that is retarding his score.

But regardless it is rather impressive that a M4 can keep up with a ten year old dual Xeon - likely because PI is not compiled to leverage the Xeon CPUs specific matrix manipulation capabilities

A further update from STAstro - he has found two interesting insights:

1. WBPP is faster under Windows then Ubuntu - total surprise there
2. Under Windows v1.8.9-1 is materially slower in WBPP than v1.8.9-3 - most of this accrues to Local Normailsation being about 40% faster in the latest version of PI running WBPP v2.7.8
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 21-12-2024, 11:33 AM
rmuhlack's Avatar
rmuhlack (Richard)
Professional Nerd

rmuhlack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Strathalbyn, SA
Posts: 971
Quote:
Originally Posted by rustigsmed View Post
not so sure about that ... for PI purposes anyway..



fastest M4 benchmark - https://www.pixinsight.com/benchmark...X051MI27XK407Z (Total 26356)


fastest E5-2699 v3 (linux) - https://www.pixinsight.com/benchmark...N64CY8O8L08466 (Total 25992)
That linux benchmark is my PC, a used Dell Precision T7910 workstation that I bought off eBay for $1200 in Jan 2024. What does a Macbook Pro M4 Max (the machine used in the other comparison test liked above) set you back...?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 21-12-2024, 04:54 PM
rmuhlack's Avatar
rmuhlack (Richard)
Professional Nerd

rmuhlack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Strathalbyn, SA
Posts: 971
Quote:
Originally Posted by g__day View Post
If you look into that benchmark - the dual Xeons are faster than the M4 - its the NVME drives that owner has paired them with that is retarding his score.
curious about your comment re NVME swap drives compromising performance. The swap storage directories (16 in all) are on a fast NVME SSD that is separate to both the OS drive and the PI working directory.

Other than using a ramdisk for PI swap, how else would you suggest setting up the swap directories to improve performance?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 21-12-2024, 11:52 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmuhlack View Post
That linux benchmark is my PC, a used Dell Precision T7910 workstation that I bought off eBay for $1200 in Jan 2024. What does a Macbook Pro M4 Max (the machine used in the other comparison test liked above) set you back...?

nice job with the setup / benchmark.

i think you're looking at about $5k for that particular model.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 22-12-2024, 07:32 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,888
I am not sure how he has set up his NVME drives - but if it used an add on Gen 4 PCIE card and set it up in RAID 0 that score would double and - if he is on Gen 5 then its performance would be double again! RAMDisks sometimes don't score as high as the very best NVME drives in RAID 0 - not sure why that is the case though...

BTW PixInsight v1.9 dropped yesterday - for a brief moment in time - I had the two fastest Windows based systems scores in the world that's right - my setup were the only two Windows enteries. V1.9 for Windows scores about 2,000 points lower than V1.8.9-3 - I haven't tried WBPP on it yet though!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-03-2025, 09:34 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,888
Well a very interesting latest release by PixInsight v1.9.3 that delivers 20% - 30% performance improvements (real world and benchmarks) by the thoughtful practice of once-off performance monitoring of worker thread numbers and sub threads spawned versus image sizes. This is basically individual machine processor optimisation of thread counts for the most frequent and heavily used tasks in PI.

So once this update is installed and all patches download - users are encouraged to run processor optimisation to create their own optimisation profile. On 8 core machines this takes about 10 - 12 minutes. On my 36 core Xeons it took about 35 minutes. One user with a 48 core / 96 thread platinum Xeon took 70 minutes running this diagnostic.

So the end results - my best run with PI version 1.9.2 scored 17,523 - my best run with version 1.9.3 is 20,207 - a very nice improvement for free!

Interesting to see one the third fast rig on the table - a Platnium Xeon 8558P - its scores top out as 21,473 for Windows and 55,091 on Linux - with exactly the same gear.

Makes me ponder would my scores would also increase by 2.5x (giving me the 4th fast rig benchmarked - vs my current 28th ranking!

Lastly a user with Xeon Gold 6536N processor has not only mapped Windows vs Linux scores - he has done this with 8, 16, 24, 32, 48, 56 and 64 threads - and the surprising conclusion is this (and most recent versions of) PI scale very poorly with increased processor threads in Windows - but on the exact same gear performance scales linearly in Linux - pointing to a poor Windows coding issue!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (My top 4 scores PI 1.9.3.jpg)
64.6 KB42 views
Click for full-size image (Fastest Xeon Linux vs WIndows scores PI 1.9.3.jpg)
74.1 KB28 views
Click for full-size image (Xeon GHold thread scaling scores PI 1.9.3.jpg)
195.6 KB35 views
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-03-2025, 10:33 PM
Leo.G (Leo)
Registered User

Leo.G is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,375
Wow, I want your computer, I must check Grey's auctions.
I tried a couple of old servers but they weren't that good. I may have been running Windows server edition on them, I don't remember, one was a 4 processor unit but old processors and they sucked energy like sand sucks water.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-03-2025, 02:25 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by g__day View Post
So the end results - my best run with PI version 1.9.2 scored 17,523 - my best run with version 1.9.3 is 20,207 - a very nice improvement for free!

Interesting to see one the third fast rig on the table - a Platnium Xeon 8558P - its scores top out as 21,473 for Windows and 55,091 on Linux - with exactly the same gear.

Makes me ponder would my scores would also increase by 2.5x (giving me the 4th fast rig benchmarked - vs my current 28th ranking!

Lastly a user with Xeon Gold 6536N processor has not only mapped Windows vs Linux scores - he has done this with 8, 16, 24, 32, 48, 56 and 64 threads - and the surprising conclusion is this (and most recent versions of) PI scale very poorly with increased processor threads in Windows - but on the exact same gear performance scales linearly in Linux - pointing to a poor Windows coding issue!
so plenty more free performance to be had with an OS upgrade! would be interesting to see your results if you decide to add a linux partition.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-03-2025, 04:09 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,888
I may try the Linux path in the future - if the PI team can't figure out what in the thread management is bottlenecking PI. The very fast Linux running under Windows runs far faster then running directly under Windows should give them some hint of where to look for what is going askew!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-03-2025, 01:46 PM
Leo.G (Leo)
Registered User

Leo.G is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,375
Which Pi are you using Matthew?
Sorry, it's probably mentioned up above somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 10-03-2025, 10:33 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,888
The latest Leo, v1.9.3 running on Windows 10 Pro
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement