ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Last Quarter 52.3%
|
|
25-04-2012, 08:42 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Holbrook, NSW
Posts: 1,230
|
|
Rokinon 14mm Lens
Hi all,
Wanted to start a discussion on what people think of this http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...gle_f_2_8.html lens or if you own one, do you like it.
I have an online fellow landscape astrophotographer in the US who has one and just posted a 100% crop of one of the corners of a shot with the lens wide open at F/2.8 showing no sign of coma at all. https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-c...03/rokinon.jpg Ignore the trailing as it is obviously done on a fixed tripod. Am I right in assuming that this lens is essentially the same as a Samyang 14mm just rebranded for the US market? I have been doing a bit of snooping around looking for reviews. Come across this comparison between a Canon 16-35mm L and the Samyang 14mm on a Canon 5D Mk II http://www.flickr.com/groups/canoneo...7624987632439/
The edge sharpness is what interests me most and if it is that good wide open with no sign of those dreaded seagulls, I'm very tempted. And at a quarter of the cost of something like the 16-25mm L. There are some obvious downsides like a third party brand meaning no AF and no software support, etc.
At the moment I am neither here nor there. Just wanting various opinions.
Cheers
Greg
|
25-04-2012, 10:58 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 610
|
|
Hi Greg,
Yes, afaik the Rockinon is a just a rebranded Samyang also known as Wallimax in some quarters.
I have some experience with the lens having tested 5 last year for a multi day stitched pano timelapse project. Overall I found it great for the price, but there were some drawbacks.
1. Quality Control. Out of 5, I only got one that was sharp corner to corner.
2. Wavey distortion. The barrel distortion is complex and noticeable on a flat horizon.
3. Strong off axis flare - noticeable when the moon is near the edge or just out of frame.
4. Strong vignetting wide open
Those issues aside, the lens is excellent for the price (if you snag a sharp one). I compared it with the Canon 16-35 II at 16mm and Canon 14mm and corner sharpness was vastly better. It also compares well against the Nikon 14-24 - with adaptor on the 5D2.
If you're interested in probing further I can post some sample starscape images.
Cheers
Colin
|
25-04-2012, 12:37 PM
|
|
Sir Post a Lot!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,770
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colinmlegg
I compared it with the Canon 16-35 II at 16mm and Canon 14mm and corner sharpness was vastly better.
|
I'm more interested in your thoughts about the Canon 16-35. What do you think about that one?
|
25-04-2012, 01:41 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 610
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman
I'm more interested in your thoughts about the Canon 16-35. What do you think about that one?
|
Hi Mike,
I haven't used it much as I don't actually own one, but have hired it a couple of times. Overall it's very good, but its weakness (for astro) is soft corners wide open, especially at 16mm. The Nikon 14-24 with adaptor is much better in that regard. Flare (into the moon shots), however, is better controlled than with the 14-24.
Colin
|
25-04-2012, 05:53 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Holbrook, NSW
Posts: 1,230
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colinmlegg
Hi Greg,
Yes, afaik the Rockinon is a just a rebranded Samyang also known as Wallimax in some quarters.
I have some experience with the lens having tested 5 last year for a multi day stitched pano timelapse project. Overall I found it great for the price, but there were some drawbacks.
1. Quality Control. Out of 5, I only got one that was sharp corner to corner.
2. Wavey distortion. The barrel distortion is complex and noticeable on a flat horizon.
3. Strong off axis flare - noticeable when the moon is near the edge or just out of frame.
4. Strong vignetting wide open
Those issues aside, the lens is excellent for the price (if you snag a sharp one). I compared it with the Canon 16-35 II at 16mm and Canon 14mm and corner sharpness was vastly better. It also compares well against the Nikon 14-24 - with adaptor on the 5D2.
If you're interested in probing further I can post some sample starscape images.
Cheers
Colin
|
Thank you so much for your thoughts on this lens Colin. I would certainly be interested in seeing some more shots done with this lens and a 5D Mk II (i'm running that camera too). Especially so, if they are star scapes. Where abouts would you recommend purchasing one from if I did decide to get one?
Cheers
Greg
|
25-04-2012, 06:10 PM
|
|
Bust Duster
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
|
|
I've got this lens. It goes by many names. Samyang is the manufacturer, but it's been rebranded as Rokinon, Vivitar, Bower, Pro Optic (that's what I got from Adorama) as far as I've seen.
I got it specifically because of that edge sharpness in reviews. While I haven't used it as extensively as Colin probably has, and haven't yet tested it for astro, I have the following comments in addition to Colin's:
- It's fully manual focus and manual aperture. Not a problem presumably for astro. I used liveview zoomed right in and it worked fine.
- As Colin mentions, the quality control is probably not up there with Canon etc. From reviews I've been reading, and mine is like this, the focus ring scale cannot be trusted. It shows focus distance, but in reality they're nowhere near right. Not a problem if you're ignoring it and focusing through the viewfinder by eye or using liveview, just something to be aware of.
- While I haven't experienced it, I can see the flare being a problem with bright light sources just out of frame. With a lens this wide, the hood (which is permanently fixed by the way) is very shallow. On top of that, the front lens glass is very rounded. ie looks like a fisheye if you've seen one. It's not a fisheye by definition, it's a rectilinear lens. But the glass looks deceptively like it.
- There is a bit of distortion, but I've found and downloaded a LightRoom profile that corrects it very well. I'm sure there'll be one for DPP or others. Just search around.
Here's a link to sample images. Mostly landscapes etc, but you get the idea. It's pretty popular.
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=909272
|
25-04-2012, 06:50 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 610
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by obsidianphotos
Thank you so much for your thoughts on this lens Colin. I would certainly be interested in seeing some more shots done with this lens and a 5D Mk II (i'm running that camera too). Especially so, if they are star scapes. Where abouts would you recommend purchasing one from if I did decide to get one?
Cheers
Greg
|
No probs Greg. Maybe best if I send you a couple of RAW files? PM me your email and I'll send through via YouSendit - unless there is a spot on the forum to upload raw images? I'll send frames from the pano showing the variation between lenses.
|
25-04-2012, 07:04 PM
|
|
Bust Duster
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
|
|
Greg, I got mine from Adorama in the US. They've got the same lens branded as Bower and Pro Optic. Identical lens, but when I bought mine the Pro Optic one was a touch cheaper for some reason.
|
25-04-2012, 09:24 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 610
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by obsidianphotos
Where abouts would you recommend purchasing one from if I did decide to get one?
Cheers
Greg
|
Sorry forgot to say, I got mine in Germany. Was a bit of a rush last June and they were in short supply.
I've uploaded a couple of RAWs to yousendit. The files expire May 9. Both are from a 5 cam pano. LENS3 is the best of the bunch and pretty sharp edge to edge. LENS1 is more representative of the others - a bit soft on the right edge and corner.
As Troy mentioned, infinity is a long way from the infinity notch and varies from lens to lens. Once I found it I taped each lens to lock it down.
http://www.yousendit.com/download/M3...eDN0QTNLd01UQw
|
26-04-2012, 06:45 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Holbrook, NSW
Posts: 1,230
|
|
Thank you so much Troy and Colin I really appreciate your thoughts on this. Sorry for not getting back to you earlier Colin. I'm on holidays at the moment and I seem to have less time on my hands than if I was working Just had a look at those files you sent. Thank you so much for doing that. I can certainly see what you mean about the vignetting, but the star performance at the edges of even the "soft" version of the lens looks very promissing. I think I will give this lens a shot and hopefully bag a good version. For 400 dollars or so, I haven't got much to loose really.
Thanks again guys
Cheers
Greg
|
26-04-2012, 07:16 AM
|
|
Sir Post a Lot!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,770
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by obsidianphotos
For 400 dollars or so, I haven't got much to loose really.
|
Where are you getting it from?
|
26-04-2012, 07:35 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Holbrook, NSW
Posts: 1,230
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman
Where are you getting it from?
|
Not sure yet Mike. Everywhere I have seen them so far has them for pretty much the same price, so I'll do some more shopping around and try and find a trusted dealer. Even if I have to pay a bit more for shipping, I will, to make sure it arrives safe.
|
26-04-2012, 08:10 AM
|
|
Bust Duster
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
|
|
One thing I meant to mention is that because of the shape of the lens and permanent front hood, you can't use filters - screw in, grads etc. I believe there are some DIY methods, if that's the way you roll.
|
27-04-2012, 09:46 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Holbrook, NSW
Posts: 1,230
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troypiggo
One thing I meant to mention is that because of the shape of the lens and permanent front hood, you can't use filters - screw in, grads etc. I believe there are some DIY methods, if that's the way you roll.
|
Thanks again Troy. Yeah I noticed that downside pretty early on in my research. I hardly ever use filters on my lenses when night shooting anyway. Find they generally introduce even more image artifacts.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:42 PM.
|
|