Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Talk
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 27-05-2005, 03:57 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Question cheshire collimator

Hi all.

The question I have for you all is: Do I REALLY need a cheshire to collimate correctly???

I guess you could say I'm from the 'old school' because I firmly believe you dont need to purchase a collimating device to do the job. I have both a reflector & a refractor, & here is my 'technique'

For the reflector, I just look down the draw-tube, get EVERY circle concentric with every other circle. Plunk the film canister with the peep-hole in the draw-tube, [which gives you more precision]keep adjusting until again..every circle is concentric with all other circles. Then take it out and star test..adjust the primary IF it needs it till all the diffraction rings are concentric. [The diagonal off-set is achieved automatically by doing the star-test collimation]

For the refractor, I take the EP out, keep the cover on over the objective...look down the draw-tube with some light behind you [such as a fluro or even a white wall that is illuminated with a decent bright light] You will see..in my case 4 round ghost-like reflections...adjust the primary till the reflections overlap, one on top of the other. Again, adjust things until all circles you see are concentric with one another...in my case, I needed to re-position the focuser assembly till it was 'square on'. I took it out for a star-test & the result was a perfect concentricity of all diffraction rings.

Now after saying all that...theres a little niggling doubt/thought in the back of my mind saying........." sorry, but it CANT be collimated correctly because you did NOT use a cheshire!!"

I posed this exact same question on the cloudy nights forum & general concensus being.. " yeah yeah, but it's EASIER with a cheshire!!"

OK, it maybe easier.....I'm not sure what I'm trying to say here!..
Ummm...is my star-test lying to me & it's not collimated CORRECTLY? IF this is the case, I WILL purchase a cheshire! As far as I know, a star-test is the defyning/correct/best way to collimate.

Thought/opinions/comments people?

Asimov










Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-05-2005, 04:14 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
it makes it easier.
but if you can do it properly without then there no reason to buy one

but at under $30 it not exactly a big purchse to make you collimation easier is it?

in the end its what you want that counts
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-05-2005, 04:17 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,138
Hi Asimov

I can't see how collimating with the star test will give you secondary offset!but I can see how It gives you good main mirror collimation.
If you don't believe that your peep hole is not doing a good job just stick a cheshire in the focuser and then you will be a believer!


Louie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-05-2005, 04:29 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
The cheapest cheshire I can find is 70 bucks! Mind telling me about the 'under 30 buck one' ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-05-2005, 04:31 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,138
ANDREWS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS !

Louie
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-05-2005, 04:37 PM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
Im also from the old school asimov and use the same technique but that doesnt mean its perfect. For visual I find it good enough, though I will admit a good tool/tools will make it easier and eliminate that nagging doubt. I will eventually purchase the tools but it wont simply be a cheshire. I'd rather jump to the top of the tree in regards to collimating if I am going to purchase tools for the job. Good collimation can be achieved, with the sight tube and a good understanding of the steps involved.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-05-2005, 04:42 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Andrews do not mention a cheshire in their telescope accessory list....only the laser
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-05-2005, 04:45 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,138
He has got them asimov ring him!


Louie
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-05-2005, 04:53 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
just call me when you need a fr.....


1800 ANDREWS

I bought mine from there so I know he has em and they are cheap
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-05-2005, 04:54 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Much obliged Louie! Oh, & you were right...a star test collimation does NOT automatically off-set the diagonal mirror! he he! [but u already knew that]

Asimov
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-05-2005, 05:40 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Re: cheshire collimator

Quote:
Originally posted by asimov
Hi all.

The question I have for you all is: Do I REALLY need a cheshire to collimate correctly???

A cheshire makes it easy to get it accurate enough that you dont need to tweak on a star test.
As you have a driven mount, star test tweaking would be a lot easier. For us dob owners, stars just wont stay put for us and some form of collimation tool is very desireable.

Last edited by Starkler; 27-05-2005 at 05:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27-05-2005, 05:48 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Hi Geoff...That's interesting, so a star test IS accurate enough.

Incidentally, My mount is not driven [as yet] After 30 years of collimating this way, one gets pretty good/quick getting to those collimating screws!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27-05-2005, 10:02 PM
RAJAH235's Avatar
RAJAH235
A very 'Senior' member.

RAJAH235 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,568
Hi asimov. The main reason that I have a Cheshire is that, after I have done any maintenance or repairs to my t'scope that required the removal of the main cell/2ndary etc, I can check the collimation very SLOWLY/ACCURATELY, using the Cheshire while indoors.(warm & dry). Final 'Star testing' is then done later.(COLD & damp).
Regards, L.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 27-05-2005, 11:04 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,652
Ok you have me convinced I am buying a Cheshire from Andrews on Monday...I belonged to the Asimov school of thought, but now I am going to come over to the dark side

actually Mike (iceman) showed me his Cheshire up at Kulnora and I have been thinking its an essential..and at below 30 dollars...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 27-05-2005, 11:25 PM
RAJAH235's Avatar
RAJAH235
A very 'Senior' member.

RAJAH235 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,568
Right Ving, How're we splitting the spotters fee? L.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 27-05-2005, 11:37 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,652
what's that 3 cents each?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 27-05-2005, 11:49 PM
RAJAH235's Avatar
RAJAH235
A very 'Senior' member.

RAJAH235 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,568
Now you all know, we're not THAT cheap! We work on a fixed contract. L.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 28-05-2005, 12:56 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
You guys had me going for awhile! Hats off to ya!

I'm staying at the old school! I cant warrant buying a cheshire, I dont care how cheap they are....After 30 yrs. I reckon Iv'e developed skills good enough to collimate without a bloody cheshire. It's called 'KNOW YOUR INSTRUMENT'

No disrespect to the people that *think* they need all this collimating stuff. I'll put the money I save into another EP.

And while I'm on the subject of the 'old school' another thing I refuse to conform to is stacking images. It's 1 raw image with a CHEAP KODAK digital camera for this lil' black duck.

I do get carried away, dont I ?? he he!

This post ain't sposed to be taken seriously.....god knows I'm gigglin' while I'm typing it!

Regards to everyone here,

Asimov
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 28-05-2005, 12:57 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
DONT do it Seekeerrrr!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 28-05-2005, 05:53 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,652
too late...in my hot little hands..now I belong to the dark side
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement