#1  
Old 15-01-2025, 08:54 AM
EC48675 (Euan)
Registered User

EC48675 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Posts: 12
C8 Edge HD + f/7 reducer coma

Hey all,

I was wondering if anyone had any experience with an issue I am facing. My imaging rig consists of a C8 edge HD with the f/7 reducer and an asi294MC pro. Notionally my camera sensor fits just within the supported image circle of the reducer, but I notice the stars are beginning to look elongated even in the centre of the FOV, pointing outwards towards the corners.

My total backfocus distance is 105.3mm and I just recently recollimated the scope so I'm really scratching my head as to how this could be happening.

Any and all input is greatly appreciated
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-01-2025, 01:26 PM
Tilt's Avatar
Tilt (Michael)
Registered User

Tilt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Emerald, QLD
Posts: 564
Using any filters in the image train?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-01-2025, 02:12 PM
EC48675 (Euan)
Registered User

EC48675 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Posts: 12
Hi,

Yes I am using an Optolong L Pro 2” Filter in a ZWO M42 Filter drawer which is screwed directly to the 11mm M42 nosepiece from the camera.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-01-2025, 02:25 PM
Tilt's Avatar
Tilt (Michael)
Registered User

Tilt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Emerald, QLD
Posts: 564
Filter glass thickness will add some distance to your backfocus calculation, not much however. 105mm using the f/7 reducer, plus 0.6mm for the filter.

At 105.3mm you should be very close.

Also, when calculating the backfocus I assume you begin from the metal back (the flat surface surrounding the glass) of the reducer?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-01-2025, 02:46 PM
EC48675 (Euan)
Registered User

EC48675 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Posts: 12
Both of those are really good points.

Now that J look at it I haven taken into account the extra distance the whole train has moved inwards by threading onto the front of the reducer. Looks like I should play around adding 1mm at a time to see how that changes things.

Thanks so much!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-01-2025, 02:52 PM
Tilt's Avatar
Tilt (Michael)
Registered User

Tilt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Emerald, QLD
Posts: 564
Whatever the thickness of the reducer thread is, add that distance to the train with a spacer.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-02-2025, 12:18 PM
EC48675 (Euan)
Registered User

EC48675 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Posts: 12
Hey there,

Just wanted to com back to this thread after doing some testing moving the camera out in mm increments. Unfortunately, the problem is still present, mostly in the top right and bottom left corners, less so in the others

Any other ideas as to what could be causing it?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-02-2025, 02:47 PM
Tilt's Avatar
Tilt (Michael)
Registered User

Tilt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Emerald, QLD
Posts: 564
The thread depth of the reducer, I’m assuming it’s 9, or 10mm? Has that been added to the image train?

Honestly, I would recalculate everything, paying particular attention to the threads. Select a zero reference point and begin from there adding back to your camera sensor, taking into account filters and the depth the sensor sits within the camera body.

Last edited by Tilt; 05-02-2025 at 03:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-02-2025, 06:53 PM
EC48675 (Euan)
Registered User

EC48675 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Posts: 12
I have tested the FOV starting from 1 to 11mm extra in 1mm increments. There didn’t seem to be any change. I might try and take off the OAG and use the T adapter to make sure it is flush with the reducer. Unless I need to add even more backspacing?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-02-2025, 07:23 PM
Tilt's Avatar
Tilt (Michael)
Registered User

Tilt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Emerald, QLD
Posts: 564
Very puzzling. Agreed, rearrange the image train to something basic, I can’t help but think there is still a miscalculation somewhere between the reducer and camera sensor (105mm).
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-02-2025, 09:41 PM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by EC48675 View Post
I haven taken into account the extra distance the whole train has moved inwards by threading onto the front of the reducer.
Not quite sure what that means.

The reducer must be the first thing screwed onto the OTA. After that it's 105mm from the very end of the reducer to the camera chip. Attached is an example from Cloudy Nights.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Screenshot 2025-02-05 223948.jpg)
60.5 KB11 views
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-02-2025, 10:34 AM
EC48675 (Euan)
Registered User

EC48675 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Posts: 12
Sorry, I should clarify. The SCT adapter part of the Celestron OAG threads onto the end of the reducer. I had counted 105mm total back focus including the full length of that adapter piece. But, because it threads onto the reducer, it is effectively brought “inwards” because the end of the reducer is now inside that adapter piece.

Hence why I tried adding a couple mm, however that didn’t seem to work. The next clear night I will try removing the oag and using the t adapter. I also need to find a way to upload my Fit files to illustrate the issue better, but they are 22MB each.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-02-2025, 10:43 AM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,933
Certainly worth trying straight trough as per the pic below. I don't have the reducer myself but do have an 8" Edge which I set up my focus positions during the day - distant TV antennae are great for showing up issues!

You can use the snipping tool to grab a screenshot of your FITS image for sharing, they save down nice and small.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement