Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Talk
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 08-07-2008, 07:39 PM
Dennis G
Dennis G

Dennis G is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albany West Aust
Posts: 213
Mike's Clavius photo in S&T mag.

I'm keen to purchase a DMK 21 mono USB and at present I'm still trying to digest what It involves.
This question is directed at you Mike. I'd like an explanation to what is printed below that magnificent photo of Clavius Crater.
1/60th exposures at 60 fps for 2 minutes.
The DMK 21 AU o4 is advertised as being able to use 60 fps, Does the above mean you captured the image with the imager set to max frames for 2 minutes as I would do at 10 fps on the Toucam? Was it takem without any filters?

Just for interest sake, my Toucam will only accept 10 fps any other setting and it changes back to 10. Is there any way one can use a higher setting and lock it in?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-07-2008, 10:06 PM
wmzaphod's Avatar
wmzaphod
Optically Obsessed

wmzaphod is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis G View Post
I'm keen to purchase a DMK 21 mono USB and at present I'm still trying to digest what It involves.
This question is directed at you Mike. I'd like an explanation to what is printed below that magnificent photo of Clavius Crater.
1/60th exposures at 60 fps for 2 minutes.
The DMK 21 AU o4 is advertised as being able to use 60 fps, Does the above mean you captured the image with the imager set to max frames for 2 minutes as I would do at 10 fps on the Toucam? Was it takem without any filters?

Just for interest sake, my Toucam will only accept 10 fps any other setting and it changes back to 10. Is there any way one can use a higher setting and lock it in?

Good question, is there any real advantage going to 60fps - been wondering myself now for a while I can understand the atmospheric distortion can affect the capture somewhat -- is it more fps the better?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-07-2008, 09:34 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
the moon does not rotate in the same way as jupiter or the other planets so time is not a huge factor, the dmk will shoot at 60 frames per second , its more the shutter speed vs brightnees that helps for moon shots.

a higher shutter speed will FREEZE the action better but you still need it bright enough to be clear and not grainy , the graininess will increase as you turn up the gain.

you can shoot 15 frames per second and 4 minutes it will be EXACTLY the same as shooting 60 frames per second for 1 minute. provided your shutter speed is the same ....ie.... 120th of a second

Seeing (the amount of atmospheric turbulence) will be the greatest factor that determines all your results.

planets aother than the moon are different as they have noticable rotation after a short period of time.


clive
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-07-2008, 09:40 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,724
Another (slight) advantage of 60fps over say, 15 fps is that for the Moon, a 3000 frame avi is recorded in ¼ of the time, so there are fewer demands on the mount and operator in trying to keep the target centred in the FOV, at what is a highly magnified image scale.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement