Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Talk
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-04-2009, 09:45 PM
penno (John)
Registered User

penno is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: australia
Posts: 3
2x vs 3x barlow lens

Hello to all, I was wondering which barlow lens to buy for my SAXON F15012EQ3 Newtonian Reflector Telescope.
my telescope came with a super 25mm wide angle and a super 10mm lens.
My understanding of a barlow lens is that if I buy a 2x barlow and fit my 10mm lens to it, it would increase its magnification from 120x to 240x is that correct. the focal lengh of my telescope is 1200mm.
could I buy the 3x barlow and get a possible 660x magnification from my 10mm lens or would it not be possible with the focal lengh being 1200mm.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-04-2009, 10:58 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Yes the 2x will double "the power" but it will also cut a sizable chunk of light that reaches your eye. Barlows magnify but they also make object appear dimmer. Unless you live on a high mountain in Chile you will never use 660x as the atmospheric conditions will not allow it so forget the 3x. Don't be fooled by the power game unless you enjoy viewing unresolved blobs at the eyepiece. I would suggest that you save and buy some good quality eyepieces that are suitable for your focal length as these would be a far better investment.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-04-2009, 01:17 AM
JD2439975's Avatar
JD2439975 (Justin)
Cloud hater

JD2439975 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Conondale QLD
Posts: 493
Hello John

The 3x will give you 360x magnification not 660, but that was probably a typo.

360X is usable on the planets but as Mark said introducing that extra glass into the optical train just makes things blurrier, better to get a dedicated EP for the job.

I went the barlow route myself and am not overly impressed with them, especially as they were cheap ones & my EP's are not.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29-04-2009, 06:51 PM
penno (John)
Registered User

penno is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: australia
Posts: 3
SAXON ED2 5.2mm 1.25" Eyepiece

Hi again thanks for the replies, I have taken your advice and I am not going down the barlow route.
I have seen this one its a SAXON ED2 5.2mm 1.25" Eyepiece.
Could anyone tell me what the ED2 means please and would it give me good magnification on the planets and the moon.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-04-2009, 07:48 PM
JD2439975's Avatar
JD2439975 (Justin)
Cloud hater

JD2439975 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Conondale QLD
Posts: 493
John, the ED stands for 'Extra-low Dispersion' which means less chromatic abberations (the blue-red fringing) on the edge of objects.
The 2 I imagine is just a version 2 of a previous range.

Running it through David Green's eyepiece calculator gives...
Exit pupil - 0.65mm.
Magnification - 230x.
True FOV - 0.24 deg.

I've read not to go below 0.50mm exit pupil, which on your scope equates to 300x mag (sorry about the 360x before, was thinking of my own scope), and anything above 400x requires excellent & rare seeing conditions.

Those figures should give you Jupiter & it's four main moons nicely in the field of view without pushing magnification of seeing conditions too hard.

As for value for money or quality of the EP I can't say, never having used one.

Hope that helps.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement