#1  
Old 04-08-2024, 07:02 PM
CoolhandJo's Avatar
CoolhandJo (Paul)
Registered User

CoolhandJo is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,737
Ngc 6726

This is the Corona Australis (NGC 6726). Its 24 hours exposure (5min ea) using a UV/IR and a Optolong Quad Enhance filter in Bortle 5 sky . I processed this in Pixinsight. The Askar V triplet was set at 495mm FL F6.18 80mm and the ASI 533 MC Pro was set to -10 deg. Belt modded HEQ5 was guiding at about 0.5 rms. Southern Hemisphere at about 50 Deg Altitude.
I was happy with imaging this and at about 20 hours I could see little noise in the image.

Astrobin here https://astrob.in/f4nlxj/0/
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC672624hrsv1ps copy iis.jpg)
202.4 KB23 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-08-2024, 09:09 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,991
Superb Paul.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-08-2024, 09:45 AM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,279
Glorious wide field image
Spectacular
Well done indeed !!
Belt modding that HEQ5 obviously has done wonders for your guiding. I had a stock HEQ5 ( my first ever mount ) about 8 years ago and the best I could get out of it was 0.85 , mostly guiding around 0.90 to 1.20.
Cheers
Martin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-08-2024, 09:54 AM
CoolhandJo's Avatar
CoolhandJo (Paul)
Registered User

CoolhandJo is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Superb Paul.

Greg.
Thank Greg!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Startrek View Post
Glorious wide field image
Spectacular
Well done indeed !!
Belt modding that HEQ5 obviously has done wonders for your guiding. I had a stock HEQ5 ( my first ever mount ) about 8 years ago and the best I could get out of it was 0.85 , mostly guiding around 0.90 to 1.20.
Cheers
Martin
Thanks Martin .. I get average 0.5 rms with the Askar V, but when I use the Samyang 135 I get 1.0 RMS! I think its the differential flexure because I dont use an off axis guider with the samyang.

Yes I was thinking about going a bit closer (600mm FL) but its not close enough to do it any justice and that's as far deep as Ican go with my optics lol. So I went for a "fit" onto my sensor. Thats the beauty of the modular Askar V i nterchange system.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-08-2024, 11:26 AM
Nikolas's Avatar
Nikolas (Nik)
Dazed and confused

Nikolas is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,344
Awesome work Paul I really love this, similar to my version at 670mm focal length with my reduced 130 apo (910-675) using the 0.75 reducer.
I did mine in Bortle 6 using the L-quad and the 294mc which has a wider field of view so the images match up well. My integration time was 6 hours but the larger aperture made up for the shorter integration time. Love your version mate it's a cracker.


Also can I ask how do you find the EQ5 belt modded mount is it a good semi portable mount to use? I'm looking to replace my eq3 with something but can't afford/refuse to pay for what they are asking for a strainwave/harmonic mount
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Cornoa small copy.jpg)
204.2 KB7 views
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-08-2024, 11:28 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,420
A really nice looking Corona that Paul, very well done from suburban skies

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-08-2024, 12:55 PM
CoolhandJo's Avatar
CoolhandJo (Paul)
Registered User

CoolhandJo is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
A really nice looking Corona that Paul, very well done from suburban skies

Mike
Thanks Mike!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
Awesome work Paul I really love this, similar to my version at 670mm focal length with my reduced 130 apo (910-675) using the 0.75 reducer.
I did mine in Bortle 6 using the L-quad and the 294mc which has a wider field of view so the images match up well. My integration time was 6 hours but the larger aperture made up for the shorter integration time. Love your version mate it's a cracker.


Also can I ask how do you find the EQ5 belt modded mount is it a good semi portable mount to use? I'm looking to replace my eq3 with something but can't afford/refuse to pay for what they are asking for a strainwave/harmonic mount
Thanks Nick. Tbh I was expecting a bit more from the quad filter. Sure it gave me a very slight outer detail on the wispy dust but that's about it. I compared it to the non filtered stack. I suppose bortle 5 I'm not going to see loads of difference anyway.

The HEQ5 I take ro Wiruna and other locations no problem at all. Belt mod is a must if you want consistency in guiding though.

I'm actually going to put mine on the market soon as I'm ready for an Am3 or am5n lol.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement