Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #141  
Old 27-11-2012, 08:41 AM
pvelez's Avatar
pvelez (Pete)
Registered User

pvelez is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,250
Does anyone have any more data on this?

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old 27-11-2012, 09:52 AM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
I've had cloud and thunderstorms every night for a week. Hopefully it clears soon.
Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old 27-11-2012, 02:20 PM
pvelez's Avatar
pvelez (Pete)
Registered User

pvelez is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,250
Same here - I collected some data on Sunday but I have yet to check it was ok. Otherwise its been decidedly ordinary

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #144  
Old 27-11-2012, 08:04 PM
pvelez's Avatar
pvelez (Pete)
Registered User

pvelez is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,250
Here's my data from 25 November 2012 - taken with my new ST-10XME:

B - 12.86
V - 12.60
R - 12.67
I - 13.26

This is calibrated.

It looks to me like the V, R and I are dropping but the B is diminishing at a slower rate.

I need to get my 13 year old son to teach me how to use Excel to plot this now.

Overcast in Sydney again - I expect no more clear skies till Friday now

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #145  
Old 28-11-2012, 09:49 AM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
Interesting.
All I got last night was 1 x 5 min exposure of its spectra then the clouds rolled in. Too much noise in the image to be of any use though.
Reply With Quote
  #146  
Old 28-11-2012, 03:19 PM
lepton3's Avatar
lepton3 (Ivan)
Registered User

lepton3 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 670
Got another R-band measurement last night.

R = 12.59 +/- 0.03

It is dimming smoothly. Here's the latest plot.

Click image for larger version

Name:	SN_2012fr_light_curve.png
Views:	19
Size:	13.4 KB
ID:	127478

-Ivan

P.S. The light curve is being updated here.
Reply With Quote
  #147  
Old 29-11-2012, 07:37 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
I'm after tips on graphing the brightness from my 11 observations over this SN.

Perhaps someone who's posting brightness measurements could advise?

Relevant software I have at my disposal:
  • Astrometrica
  • MPO Canopus
  • CCDSoft

I have tried with mixed success with these.

Astrometrica: I can process each image individually but the magnitude given seems to always be 12.0. Plate-solve is fiddly and manual for each image.

MPO: I'm getting index out of bounds errors and floating point errors. I will RTFM if this is the software I should be using...

CCDSoft: I have used the variable star function to attain a list of measured brightness values but don't fully understand the output.

Which should I have a more serious crack at getting accurate results from? Any tips?

Thanks,
Roger.
Reply With Quote
  #148  
Old 30-11-2012, 07:41 PM
pvelez's Avatar
pvelez (Pete)
Registered User

pvelez is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,250
Roger

I use MPO Canopus - but only to work out the mags without plotting. Will try that later in the weekend when I have time. Might be able to give some more value then

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #149  
Old 30-11-2012, 07:41 PM
pvelez's Avatar
pvelez (Pete)
Registered User

pvelez is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,250
My results from last night

B - 12.28
V - 12.81
R - 12.90
I - 13.31

I'll practice plotting and then see what I can produce

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #150  
Old 02-12-2012, 11:54 AM
MLParkinson's Avatar
MLParkinson (Murray)
Registered User

MLParkinson is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Heathcote, Sydney
Posts: 209
I've looked at the price of MPO Canopus and it is well within my budget. Can you give me tips on buying a set of 1.25-inch BVIR filters? My hunch is this will be over $1000 so I will think long and hard before making the investment. Obviously the filters need to be of a very high quality. Thanks for the tips. Murray.
Reply With Quote
  #151  
Old 02-12-2012, 09:11 PM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by MLParkinson View Post
I've looked at the price of MPO Canopus and it is well within my budget. Can you give me tips on buying a set of 1.25-inch BVIR filters? My hunch is this will be over $1000 so I will think long and hard before making the investment. Obviously the filters need to be of a very high quality. Thanks for the tips. Murray.
Murray
I have used lots of different software for photometry. I have MPO canopus but don't use it for photometry as I find it somewhat difficult to use.
For most of my photometry I use AIP4WIN which comes with Richard Berry's book. You can buy it from here http://www.willbell.com/aip/index.htm for $99.
The comp star data just comes from the AAVSO database.
Another option is the free software Munuwin http://www.softpedia.com/progDownloa...ad-156287.html
I have played with it and it is OK.
Photometry filters are quite expensive and are not available in Australia (AFAIK)
I have Astrodon filters and they cost US$175 each from Opt. They currently have "Custom Scientific" filters on special at US$150. I assume they would be fine. See here
http://www.optcorp.com/ProductList.a...9-327-1157-863
Cheers
Terry
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 02-12-2012, 09:19 PM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
Data from 28/11/12
13.066,0.046,B
12.684,0.048,V
12.766,0.026,R
13.224,0.057,I
It is slowly decreasing in brightness.
Spectra is attached for 28th and 30th.
http://www.aavso.org/tmp3/667637308.png
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (_sn2012fr_20121128_457.png)
7.7 KB12 views
Click for full-size image (_sn2012fr_20121130_464.png)
8.8 KB7 views
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 03-12-2012, 12:52 AM
Glenpiper's Avatar
Glenpiper (Bernard)
Quicquid Nitet Notandum

Glenpiper is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 89
Hi Terry,

I'm happy to see you are still getting spectra of this SN as I've switched my spectrograph back to a high-res mode for another project ... not that the weather is cooperating on that!

Custon Scientific cheaper than Astrodon ... that is a surprise, as CS used to be the more expensive and desirable of the two. I understand that the Schuler BVRIs (once the 'poor man's CS) have improved since Don, of Astrodon, took them over ... so have the tables been turned?
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 03-12-2012, 07:52 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Murray, you have a PM
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 03-12-2012, 09:41 AM
Greg Bock's Avatar
Greg Bock (Greg Bock)
Registered User

Greg Bock is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 377
Wow guys, it's refreshing to see so much activity around this SN event, and also to follow the emergence of the spectral and photometry data..keep it up!
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 04-12-2012, 09:33 AM
lepton3's Avatar
lepton3 (Ivan)
Registered User

lepton3 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 670
Fascinating to follow the evolution of this supernova. It is moving into a new phase, where the brightness is levelling off. Apparently this feature (I've seen it called the "shoulder" in articles) is commonly seen for type Ia supernovae in the R and longer wavelength bands.

-Ivan

P.S. For the person who was inquiring about filters, FWIW I use Custom Scientific photometric filters and have not had any reason to fault them optically. A minor niggle is that the thread is a bit small for my Orion 5-posn filter wheel. I pack the threads out with teflon tape to get them to sit snugly in the filter wheel.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (SN_2012fr_light_curve.png)
14.0 KB12 views
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 09-12-2012, 12:13 AM
lepton3's Avatar
lepton3 (Ivan)
Registered User

lepton3 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 670
Maybe I have made an error, but tonight my measurement of this SN shows it has brightened by about 0.19 mag.

I've checked the images carefully, and the plate magnitude differs from that of December 5th by only 0.003 mag, so it really does look like it has flared.

On the 5th, it was 12.758 +/- 0.021, tonight (8th) it is 12.571 +/- 0.019.

I am measuring with an R filter. Can anyone confirm/refute?

-Ivan
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 09-12-2012, 10:46 PM
lepton3's Avatar
lepton3 (Ivan)
Registered User

lepton3 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 670
OK, tonight (9th Dec) the measurement is R=12.790 +/- 0.22, which is very nicely in line with the previous measurements, so for now I'm treating the data from last night as erroneous.

But I'm going to go over it again, because I can't see what was wrong with the setup.

-Ivan
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 11-12-2012, 12:11 AM
Glenpiper's Avatar
Glenpiper (Bernard)
Quicquid Nitet Notandum

Glenpiper is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 89
Alain Klotz, the pro who discovered this SN, has just posted the following to the Spectro-L forum:


Hello all,

The TAROT photometry continues and I seen that your
spectroscopic follow-up continues also:

http://www.astrosurf.com/aras/survey...2012fr/obs.htm

The maximum of B light is reached on the 2012 Nov.
11.0 (+/-0.5 day). The Delta_m15(B) = +0.77 which
is very slow decay. This last point is important
because it would mean a very large amount of Nickel
produced by the supernova.

Usually, a low value of Delta_m15(B) is correlated
to a high value of the brightness at the maximum
of light which is not the case for 2012fr.
The representative point of 2012fr in
this diagram is well outside the correlation.

So, the supernova begins to become atypic.
It should be a good idea to continue to observe it.
The present magnitudes today are:

B=13.7 V=12.8 R=12.7

The R and V magnitudes are now in the bump phase
which implies you can continue to record spectra
easily for one month more.

Clear skies,
Alain.


__._,_.___
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 20-12-2012, 09:05 AM
lepton3's Avatar
lepton3 (Ivan)
Registered User

lepton3 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 670
Light curve evolving

The supernova continues along its evolution. This light curve is becoming a long term project -- 53 days in and 23 observing sessions so far.

We seem to be past the shoulder phase and back on to the usual decline. Still plenty bright for accurate photometry, and probably still possible to get spectra for a while yet.

-Ivan
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (SN_2012fr_light_curve.png)
13.8 KB10 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement