Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #81  
Old 09-06-2018, 09:25 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by silv View Post
Dave "tchus" at the end of your post makes the preceding sentence sound sarcastic. And "tchus" then could also be interpreted as "delete yourself".
Is that intentional? If you were German I'd say it is intentional but an Aussi isn't usually that rude so I better ask and get a chance to verify or amend my nationalism/racism regarding Aussi's politeness.
Tsk Tsk Dave, for Northern Germans you need to use tschüß. (I can say that, my lineage is from Lübeck, very close to Rostock ) Better still, just use auf Wiedersehen to alleviate misconceptions, but that too can seem sarcastic.

Now, Annette, Aussi??? I do not think Dave is an East German.

I vividly recall being in Berlin in 1989 and 1990...everywhere we heard people talking about Aussi's... to the point my father went into a bank to change some traveller's cheques (remember those ) and the cashier saying/asking "Du bist Aussi?". My father replied, in his schoolboy German, Ja. She then started to give him EXTRA money, to which he was bewildered. Someone finally explained to him what it meant - the West German (or Reunified) government was dolling out money to East Germans...he had to give it back
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 09-06-2018, 09:25 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
Tin foil hats for all Murdoch is winning because of alarmist crap and some of you are swallowing it up.
No tin foil at all. I just know how it's done.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 09-06-2018, 09:36 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
No tin foil at all. I just know how it's done.
Yup and yup.

What we were led to believe were conspiracy theories (incidentally, a term the CIA coined) 20 years ago are now well proven fact.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 09-06-2018, 09:38 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
Tin foil hats for all Murdoch is winning because of alarmist crap and some of you are swallowing it up.
If you insist on adhering to the Ostrich Syndrome, I suggest putting on a tin foil beenie before inserting said head in the sand.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 09-06-2018, 09:46 AM
Nikolas's Avatar
Nikolas (Nik)
Dazed and confused

Nikolas is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpastern View Post
Take the time to watch the entirety of the Noam Chomsky video that I posted in another thread Nikolas. It's not alarmist at all.
Watched it and not convinced. If you don't want your data tracked get off the internet altogether, it's not just social media, it's every web search, etc etc etc. Even here on this forum you are datamined.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 09-06-2018, 09:50 AM
Nikolas's Avatar
Nikolas (Nik)
Dazed and confused

Nikolas is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
Alarmist enough for a full Senate enquiry costing millions in the USA...

Enough for the Australian government to expend MILLIONS of dollars on helping prevent against the government systems?

I suggested reading the ASD guidelines a few posts ago. The ASD is the Australian Signals Directorate - basically, cyber security on steroids in Australia. I'd suggest at a minimum following and adhering to many of their Essential 8. There is PLENTY of reading on their website for anyone interested in FACT, not crap. Here is a primer for you: https://www.asd.gov.au/publications/...rity-model.htm
The senate inquiry showed how out of touch these senators are, did you see what questions they were asking him? They are clueless.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...ok-regulations

And one even from Murdoch press
https://www.news.com.au/technology/o...aa8999ead3e5fa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vL4HLTZQ_Q
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 09-06-2018, 09:52 AM
Nikolas's Avatar
Nikolas (Nik)
Dazed and confused

Nikolas is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
No tin foil at all. I just know how it's done.
And?

You are now on the cia hit list because you know what they don't want you to know, oh crap I just mentioned cia that means I'm done for too.
sheesh.....
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 09-06-2018, 10:00 AM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Gday Nik
Quote:
Even here on this forum you are datamined
Dont disagree, but its relatively raw data, and a relatively small dataset.
FB has specialised in linking the data "and people", thus making it hundreds of times more useful, esp as they report now having over 2billion users signed up, and probably a similar no hoovered up along the way.
Selling that sort of stuff to the chinese etc, is what i am more concerned with, vs say the council selling the dog register to the petfood companies.


Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 09-06-2018, 11:04 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
And?

You are now on the cia hit list because you know what they don't want you to know, oh crap I just mentioned cia that means I'm done for too.
sheesh.....
Look, you're free to believe what you want, there is nothing sinister here, nothing covert, it's just the way things work. Data leads to sales. Period.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewJ View Post
Gday Nik

Dont disagree, but its relatively raw data, and a relatively small dataset.
FB has specialised in linking the data "and people", thus making it hundreds of times more useful, esp as they report now having over 2billion users signed up, and probably a similar no hoovered up along the way.
Selling that sort of stuff to the chinese etc, is what i am more concerned with, vs say the council selling the dog register to the petfood companies.


Andrew
Hi Andrew, all the data is raw. Every bit of data counts and adds up. IIS is a public forum. What we're discussing here right now gets picked up by Google bot almost on an hourly basis and gets indexed. Discrete pieces of information might not make sense, but when you get enough of them together you can correlate and get something out of it as the big picture starts forming. The technology and algos involved are pretty cool really. How it gets used is up to individuals. Privacy is a dinosaur in the digital age.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 09-06-2018, 11:51 AM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Gday Marc
I understand its all being collected and indexed, but FB has far more backroom processing going on than most of the other sites, and from what i understood of the info the other day, FB was selling the processed data ( as its more profitable ).

Quote:
How it gets used is up to individuals.
Or possibly Governments???
I always remembered that when working with software development and data, getting it to do what you want was about 10% of the effort.
Preventing it being misused was 90%.


Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 09-06-2018, 12:15 PM
Nikolas's Avatar
Nikolas (Nik)
Dazed and confused

Nikolas is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Look, you're free to believe what you want, there is nothing sinister here, nothing covert, it's just the way things work. Data leads to sales. Period.


That's what I've been trying to say, it's all about target advertising, aimed at me who won't see the ads due to adblockers so it's wasted on themk, all the conspiracy theories some here have gone on about is over the top, hence my scepticism about sinister connotations.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 09-06-2018, 12:50 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
I use Facebook to run my Snap Photography Brisbane group, couldn't live with out it. 1500 members now...lol
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 09-06-2018, 02:13 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by silv View Post
Dave "tchus" at the end of your post makes the preceding sentence sound sarcastic. And "tchus" then could also be interpreted as "delete yourself".
Is that intentional? If you were German I'd say it is intentional but an Aussi isn't usually that rude so I better ask and get a chance to verify or amend my nationalism/racism regarding Aussi's politeness.
Annette- the tchus was meant as a polite goodbye, nothing more! I'm Australian, but my dad was born in the Vaterland (Duesseldorf).
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 09-06-2018, 02:17 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
Tsk Tsk Dave, for Northern Germans you need to use tschüß. (I can say that, my lineage is from Lübeck, very close to Rostock ) Better still, just use auf Wiedersehen to alleviate misconceptions, but that too can seem sarcastic.

Now, Annette, Aussi??? I do not think Dave is an East German.

I vividly recall being in Berlin in 1989 and 1990...everywhere we heard people talking about Aussi's... to the point my father went into a bank to change some traveller's cheques (remember those ) and the cashier saying/asking "Du bist Aussi?". My father replied, in his schoolboy German, Ja. She then started to give him EXTRA money, to which he was bewildered. Someone finally explained to him what it meant - the West German (or Reunified) government was dolling out money to East Germans...he had to give it back
I'm too lazy to spell German correctly lol. Sorry! I find auf wiedersehen just too informal and dry and much prefer tchus for a more personal touch.

PS my German spelling sucks anyway lol.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 09-06-2018, 02:35 PM
alan meehan's Avatar
alan meehan (Alan)
Registered User

alan meehan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: maryland newcastle AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,851
this will get all those data collectors send them this then we will have one big file
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (thNRWS6XJG.jpg)
7.6 KB14 views
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 09-06-2018, 03:16 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,389
That guy has acne craters
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 09-06-2018, 03:29 PM
Stonius's Avatar
Stonius (Markus)
Registered User

Stonius is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,508
The grand irony is that we live in a world where corporations demand our personal data for security reasons, which they then fail to keep secure. I'm talking more about the inevitable hacks and data breaches that every company and government department is prone to, rather than FB where people have willingly given up their security. But then it's amazing what people can find out if they really want to even without recourse to Mr Zuckerberg.

I just find it strange that companies demand secret information for security, then store that information in vast databases which will inevitably be hacked. It makes the integrity of the process useless and therefore, meaningless.

'Personal information' isn't worth anything anymore from a security standpoint.

But you can't just generate a new birthdate and start fresh, can you? It's a bit of a crisis, IMO.

Markus
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 09-06-2018, 04:15 PM
redbeard's Avatar
redbeard (Damien)
Registered User

redbeard is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 558
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewJ View Post
I always remembered that when working with software development and data, getting it to do what you want was about 10% of the effort.
Preventing it being misused was 90%.
Andrew
+1

Cheers,
Damien.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 09-06-2018, 04:19 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewJ View Post
Gday Marc
I understand its all being collected and indexed, but FB has far more backroom processing going on than most of the other sites, and from what i understood of the info the other day, FB was selling the processed data ( as its more profitable ).

Or possibly Governments???
I always remembered that when working with software development and data, getting it to do what you want was about 10% of the effort.
Preventing it being misused was 90%.


Andrew
It is getting increasingly cheaper to process data because the models that were once optimised by humans are now done by machines and not surprisingly more efficiently, faster and more reliably. I don't know the numbers for 2017 or 2018 but taking a base line in 2015, 2016 efficiency was already 80% up from the previous year with what they call deep learning. It is quite CPU intensive but there are services providing server farms for hire to crunch the numbers, a bit like rendering farms for the movie industry.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 09-06-2018, 05:09 PM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Gday Marc
Fully understood, but again, you need massive data, and who better than FB to give it to you.
The EU has just brought in laws that may help curb some of that, but as per above, having data collated "for good" is 10%, and blocking misuse is a bit harder, esp when the owner of the company is the one selling it off behind everyones backs.
Interesting why Snowden and Assange are pariahs for making private data freely available, but Suckerberg is still not being attacked, ( other than a slap on the cheek with a wet lettuce )
I guess it comes down to whos privacy was exposed??????


Andrew
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement