Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 10 votes, 5.00 average.
  #41  
Old 01-08-2010, 05:36 PM
torana68's Avatar
torana68 (Roger)
Registered User

torana68 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ACT/NSW
Posts: 786
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Mounsey View Post
.... Ironic since it's devastating to images depending on the angle. I would definitely stick to solid tubes when practical. They hold collimation better as well.
ok, i dont own an open tube Newtonian so this is just out of interest, would the degradation be in the order of say 5% at worst (compairing to a theoritical 100% perfect image)? when you say images do you mean visual? thanks for the input.
Roger
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 01-08-2010, 05:45 PM
gb_astro
Registered User

gb_astro is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Mounsey View Post
This is my first post on this site. That is correct, the shroud does not protect against body currents, in fact even if you were wearing a thick down coat, it too, would not stop the heat currents. I would also like to thank gb for correcting the number of misunderstandings about my review.

Regards,
Daniel Mounsey
Daniel, welcome to the forum, although you
must feel like you have just walked in on a bar room brawl.

The usual IIS spirit of co-operation
seems to have have gone AWOL on this one.

I am a bit surprised though that you find a thick down coat
or similar insulation does not reduce the problem.
Logically it should.

(Anyone have a thermal imaging camera? )

gb.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 01-08-2010, 06:24 PM
Daniel Mounsey
Registered User

Daniel Mounsey is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by torana68 View Post
ok, i dont own an open tube Newtonian so this is just out of interest, would the degradation be in the order of say 5% at worst (compairing to a theoritical 100% perfect image)? when you say images do you mean visual? thanks for the input.
Roger
I've never really thought of it like a percentage. The simplest way to describe it is to say that an observer can harm delicate images like double stars and planets. It makes the images soft and fuzzy.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 01-08-2010, 07:11 PM
torana68's Avatar
torana68 (Roger)
Registered User

torana68 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ACT/NSW
Posts: 786
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Mounsey View Post
that an observer can harm delicate images like double stars and planets. It makes the images soft and fuzzy.
righto, gotcha. thanks for your thoughts
Roger
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 01-08-2010, 07:43 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Daniel. Welcome,,,, Looks like you must be a bit more precise with your wording. On this forum images refer to camera images and you will incur the wrath of Mr Bambury. He has a definite hatered for imaging of any kind. (Before you sink both feet again John. You were the BIG voice against the IIS Compendium for Astro imagers and had quite a bit to say about the quality of the images shown in this lovely book. Not bad from one who doesn't image.) To be politically correct you had better refer to it as Visual observations.

Again welcome Daniel, but I would have thought the temprature rise accross on open scope with the body close would have only been a microscopic amount and wouldn't have caused aberations as high as the quality of even the best mirrors. It does open up a lot of concerns for me as an imager trying to image through many layers of atmosphere all with differing thermal values.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 01-08-2010, 07:54 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar View Post
Daniel. Welcome,,,, Looks like you must be a bit more precise with your wording. On this forum images refer to camera images and you will incur the wrath of Mr Bambury. He has a definite hatered for imaging of any kind. (Before you sink both feet again John. You were the BIG voice against the IIS Compendium for Astro imagers and had quite a bit to say about the quality of the images shown in this lovely book. Not bad from one who doesn't image.)
Not to mention the personal attacks against the people who contributed. Don't know why you bothered Doug.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 01-08-2010, 11:44 PM
Daniel Mounsey
Registered User

Daniel Mounsey is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 5
No problem gentleman. It's a pleasure to be in your forum and i like the candidness down under. Good point on not using the "images" term. "Views" for lack of a better word. Ice In Space is a fantastic name for a site.
Best,
Daniel
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 02-08-2010, 12:42 AM
Jen's Avatar
Jen
Moving to Pandora

Jen is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Swan Hill
Posts: 7,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar View Post
Dougs in the back row throwing Jaffas.
Jen eats the jaffas
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 02-08-2010, 08:10 AM
desler's Avatar
desler
Registered User

desler is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Werribee, Australia
Posts: 1,053
Does the three second rule apply Jen?, I may be able to support you in those efforts.

Darren.....
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 02-08-2010, 09:04 PM
Jen's Avatar
Jen
Moving to Pandora

Jen is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Swan Hill
Posts: 7,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by desler View Post
Does the three second rule apply Jen?, I may be able to support you in those efforts.

Darren.....
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 07-08-2010, 07:33 PM
mbaddah (Mo)
Registered User

mbaddah is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 807
Hi Daniel welcome to IIS.

Some very informative comments made...

gb would be great if someone had a thermal camera to test it out I would have thought a shroud would prevent a problem like this from happening as well.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement