Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 26-10-2005, 11:11 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Interesting , every time you put your camera in your scope and take an image would the camera be in the exact orientation every time ? Its starting to look more like Its an internal reflection ,would explain the movent If the camera wasn't in the same position for every shot . Also as the star moves lower down, the angle the star light hits the camera might change the position of a reflection in the camera .

Last edited by atalas; 26-10-2005 at 11:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 27-10-2005, 11:09 AM
PhotonCollector's Avatar
PhotonCollector (Paul)
All alone in the night

PhotonCollector is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW. Australia.
Posts: 607
Quote:
Originally Posted by Striker
Hi All...

Just wondering what this blue image is right beside the star Formalhaut out of focus.

I think this focus shot was taken 2 night ago.
I loaded your image and stretched the levels, cropped the strange object and did a 3x enlargement on it to get the two images I attached.

Well it certainly doesn't appear to be an astronomical object.

Paul.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (formalhaut[1].jpg)
81.9 KB13 views
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 27-10-2005, 11:40 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
is it a doughnut?
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 27-10-2005, 11:59 AM
PhotonCollector's Avatar
PhotonCollector (Paul)
All alone in the night

PhotonCollector is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW. Australia.
Posts: 607
Quote:
Originally Posted by ving
is it a doughnut?
yes i thought that too! However, I have a Canon 300D and when I see doughnuts on it, they never look anything like that!

The enlargement seems to show concentric rings !! And the bright spot at centre almost looks like a secondary mirror (a tad out of collimation) !! ??

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 27-10-2005, 12:22 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Interesting Paul....

I just wish I could have some clear sky to take some more images....

Even off other bright stars.

Looks like my moving planetry is not looking any good anymore.....lol
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 27-10-2005, 12:25 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Tony, before you posted those images did you crop them at all. If so can you upload the uncropped images. I'd like to see where your "blue planetary" is situated spacially on the chip in each exposure.

Also can you post your exact times for when you took the shots eg 8:30 PM 25/10/05. You can get that info if you right click on the original image in windows explorer,
select properties,
then the summary tab,
then advanced at the bottom right of the properties box.

If you then scroll to the bottom of the images list, Date and Time Taken will show up before the description section. This will be helpful, assuming your camera has the right date and time set
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 27-10-2005, 12:33 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Oh and if your home now check your camera time against the time at the bottom of the page here. Just to check
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 27-10-2005, 12:41 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Paul,

The second uncropped image I posted was 22nd October 2005 9:53pm

This one.

I have checked the date & time...its correct...but it could be a minute or 2 out at the most.

All other pictures have been edited so no time or date available.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (formalhautfull.jpg)
54.3 KB16 views
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 27-10-2005, 12:58 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
You don't keep your originals uneditted and save the modified ones as different images

Are the others uncropped and at the same focal length/magnification?
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 27-10-2005, 01:40 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Yes I do Paul...but at the time these were just focus images...nothing special....

The others would be the same focal length but they could have been different rezolution as I was playing around with DSLR focus image quality settings.

I might have more originals on my observatory computer.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 27-10-2005, 03:05 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
It's a fake. Well done. You had us all going there for a while, Tony!
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 27-10-2005, 03:28 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
If you wouldn't mind would you zip up the originals (jpeg would be fine as long as they haven't been cropped) and email them to me at my yahoo address. I'd like to have a close look at them and have a bit of a play with them. They were all taken at prime focus with your celestron and a Focal reducer, right?
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 27-10-2005, 05:12 PM
acropolite's Avatar
acropolite (Phil)
Registered User

acropolite is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
Tony, if you can capture again, swinging the OTAso the star moves to a different point in the FOV should prove if it's a reflection. If the blue Unidentified Object stays put, relative to the star, then it's can't be an internal reflection....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement