Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 21-06-2009, 04:53 PM
Marclau's Avatar
Marclau (Marcel)
I WANT TO BELIEVE

Marclau is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Victoria,...
Posts: 170
Thanks leinad, good reading...........also another angle to GW........might just have to begin buying up all the thermal underwear for the family.....

We have already noticed colder nights and mornings down the Peninsula.
Although only a cheap weather station, our La Crosse has been showing tempatures colder during the night/mornings then previous years....might not be anything, but still noticeable non the less.
  #42  
Old 21-06-2009, 05:07 PM
beefking (Nathan)
Registered User

beefking is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swanssm View Post
Ken,
I believe the questions you are refering to are:

Direct Quote from The Australian - June 19
* Is it the case that CO2 increased by 5percent since 1998 while global temperature cooled during the same period? If so, why did the temperature not increase, and how can human emissions be to blame for dangerous levels of warming?
the best explanation for temperature not increasing since 1998 is that 1998 was the strongest el nino of the century. Subsequent el nino's have not been as strong.


Quote:
* Is it the case that the rate and magnitude of warming between 1979 and 1998 (the late 20th-century phase of global warming) were not unusual as compared with warmings that have occurred earlier in the Earth's history? If the warming was not unusual, why is it perceived to have been caused by human CO2 emissions and, in any event, why is warming a problem if the Earth has experienced similar warmings in the past?
The rate is unusual.

Quote:
* Is it the case that all computer models projected a steady increase in temperature for the period 1990 to 2008, whereas in fact there were only eight years of warming followed by 10years of stasis and cooling? If so, why is it assumed that long-term climate projections by the same models are suitable as a basis for public policy-making?
It is not the case that all computer models projected a steady increase in temperature over the period 1990 to 2008.
  #43  
Old 21-06-2009, 05:08 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
This thread has become almost identical to the other one started by Peter Ward, with the same people posting.

I'm going to lock this one, and any discussion can continue in the original thread. We don't need two threads discussing the same thing at the same time.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement