Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 22-11-2008, 06:28 PM
deadsimple's Avatar
deadsimple (Ash)
Registered User

deadsimple is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 180
Quote:
Originally Posted by wasyoungonce View Post
I think that iOptron had problems with some of the serial commands (they were using) not being understood by the SIL labs CP2102.
I can assure you that the CP210x chips don't understand nor care about any of the data bytes going through the channel. They are just simple serial bridges: byte in, byte out - each byte is just like any other byte from its point of view, hence it should never freeze up on specific data. So no reason to avoid the chips, just sounds like a bug on the iOptron side.

I'll just leave it there is not much more point in discussing this specific issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by bojan View Post
Rajiva's mod is almost identical in both hardware and functionality to Darren's solution, but (much more) expensive
That is indeed crazily expensive. Looking at probably $250 minimum (after delivery) just for a kit of parts and board! Wow, no offense to them but they should get employment at the mount's manufacturer with that mentality
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 22-11-2008, 08:32 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadsimple View Post
That is indeed crazily expensive. Looking at probably $250 minimum (after delivery) just for a kit of parts and board! Wow, no offense to them but they should get employment at the mount's manufacturer with that mentality
I agree.

But, luckily, there are fine people out there with different mentality. like Darren, like Mel Bartels.. I only wish there are more of them around :-) And I wish the general amateur community is less supportive of those "enterpreneurs"
Because, really, we are amateurs.. Do we really HAVE to have better (and more expensive) equipment than professionals? And then take pretty pictures only?
I always wanted to do more with less money.. It is easy to simply go and spend M$ and then what?
On the other side, a friend of mine is involved in real work, with minimal equipment: Canon 400D and 180mm lens (probably on EQ6 :-) ). With this basic setup, he managed to detect and confirm the transit of exoplanet across its star, more details here: http://brucegary.net/AXA/XO4/xo4.htm
I found this website most inspiring. Persistence and know-how.. the true values.

Last edited by bojan; 22-11-2008 at 09:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement