Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 06-09-2008, 05:35 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
it arrived yesterday. unfortunately for me it balances ok without anything on it, it will not balance however with camera/dew shield/heater band etc etc.. I need another counterweight...

I think I'll just use the old 8" tonight.. I'll go somewhere monday and get another counterweight.
I picked up a 5kg cw from Ron (Sirius Optics at Underwood) at the Qld Astrofest as it happened to fit my EM200 mount, although I think it was an EQ6 cw. They may have stock so it might be worth giving the shop a call.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-09-2008, 05:37 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Yeah, I'll give them and York Optical a go... Should be around the $55 - $60 mark yeah?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-09-2008, 06:50 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Yeah, I'll give them and York Optical a go... Should be around the $55 - $60 mark yeah?
That sounds about right and yes, York may have stock too so you should be able to pick one up, which is good news.

How much weight do you think you need to balance the C11 when it is fully accessorised and loaded with finder scope, focuser, camera, side-by-side plate, rings, guide scope, etc?

For the C9.25, I need 20kgs (4 x 5kgs).

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-09-2008, 07:33 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
I don't know with the whole setup.. I would imagine 4 counterweights should do it... my guide scope + guide cam + QHY8 + C11 weighs just on 14kgs... The side by side bar and guide ring setup wouldnt weigh 1kg i dont think.... Should be right... we'll have to wait and see i guess
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-09-2008, 10:04 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt View Post
I'm considering having a go at this tonight, Dennis.

Although it's quite windy today, and the seeing's going to be horrid.
It probably doesn't matter too much about the seeing, since I'm not trying to capture very fine planetary surface detail as is the case with Jupiter.

I wonder what length exposure I'd need to set using the C9.25, DMK 21AF04 and 3x barlow??? Would it be wise to use some kind of filter (IR)?? Hmmm.

It'll be a night of experimentation
.
Hey Matt

I’ve just come inside after looking at both Uranus and Neptune at the F12 prime focus of the Mewlon 180 with the DMK31AF04.AS. I was having to shoot between 5 and 10 second exposures, Gain around 850 and Gamma at 12 just to (barely) record any of the moons. I couldn’t even contemplate putting a PowerMate or Barlow in the optical train to increase the magnification! Neptune's Triton was the easiest of the moons.

It seems that with the 7” aperture of the Mewlon, it’s either the ST7E CCD or no moons! How did you get on with the increased aperture of the C9.25?

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 07-09-2008, 08:27 AM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Hi Dennis.

I decided to give last night a miss. It was still very windy here at 8.30pm, so there seemed little point in setting up.

A challenge for another night, for me
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 07-09-2008, 12:54 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,822
Hi Matt

Yes, it was a bit of a shocker wasn’t it, with the very gusty conditions all day long. The more violent gusts seemed to have abated by around 10:00pm, so I went outside and just had a bit of a play around with a new focusing mask that I had built, so no serious imaging done here.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement