Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 24-09-2017, 07:56 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Impressively deep. Nice one
Thanks Peter.

Well that's it for me. Out of 37h I have culled down the best subs to a total of 25.5h so 153x10min subs. It is smoother but the sky glow makes it too hard to bring the faint stuff out of the background so my next go on the new moon will be from a dark site with longer exposures, weather pending.

Normal [1731x1620 - 1.4MB]
Inverted [1731x1620 - 2.1MB]
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC7293_Ha_HS3_I_153_sf.jpg)
208.2 KB20 views
Click for full-size image (NGC7293_Ha_HS3_153_sf.jpg)
196.1 KB24 views
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 24-09-2017, 09:10 PM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Amazing how much you've pulled out there, Marc. The super-faint twisty stalk heading off toward 4 o'clock is definitely there now.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 24-09-2017, 09:18 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Really nice Marc! We are in a strange photographic field where sometimes less is more
Culling 10+ hours of data improves a final image stack.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 25-09-2017, 07:54 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus View Post
Amazing how much you've pulled out there, Marc. The super-faint twisty stalk heading off toward 4 o'clock is definitely there now.
Thanks very much Mike for your help, encouragement and inspiration. Looking very much forward to a reshoot at Placidus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
Really nice Marc! We are in a strange photographic field where sometimes less is more
Culling 10+ hours of data improves a final image stack.
Thanks Colin. In the end, even keeping only cloud free subs shot close to the zenith still proved to be very complicated to get rid of gradients and light pollution. I hear it's possible to get signal from heavily light polluted areas but I just don't have the processing skills nor the patience to deal with the situation. I'm at an impasse. So it's off to the styx next and take the easy way out.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 25-09-2017, 02:30 PM
Retrograde's Avatar
Retrograde (Pete)
a.k.a. @AstroscapePete

Retrograde is online now
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,729
This is phenomenally deep. Well done!
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 25-09-2017, 05:38 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retrograde View Post
This is phenomenally deep. Well done!
Thanks Pete. but will definitely revisit
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement