Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 19-05-2016, 09:54 PM
deanm (Dean)
Registered User

deanm is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 818
"by definition it can't be infinite."

Hmm... and the upper limit for the mass of your finite universe is: [.......]

(please complete [between square brackets] using any appropriate measure!)

And the basis underpinning your assertion is: [.......]

Dean
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 19-05-2016, 10:04 PM
Stonius's Avatar
Stonius (Markus)
Registered User

Stonius is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,508
I'm no mathematician, but I thought it had been proven by Georg Cantor that there are an infinitude of mathematical infinities, and of different sized infinities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor

Simple thought experiment; How many decimals lie between the integers 0 and 1? Answer, Infinity.

Now how about between 0 and 2? Answer; 2 x infinity.

I'm sure I'm butchering it, but it's the way I get my head around the idea of different sized infinities.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 19-05-2016, 10:05 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
we are definitely not alone - and I challenge anyone to prove otherwise .
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 19-05-2016, 10:06 PM
deanm (Dean)
Registered User

deanm is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 818
"Simple thought experiment; How many decimals lie between the integers 0 and 1? Answer, Infinity."

Agreed.

"Now how about between 0 and 2? Answer; 2 x infinity".

No, just infinity.

Infinity has no dimensions involving measures of time or space.

Dean.

Last edited by deanm; 19-05-2016 at 10:09 PM. Reason: Spulling!
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 19-05-2016, 10:10 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
If the universe began with the big bang, and is still expanding[even accelerating its rate of expansion] then by definition it can't be infinite.
raymo
I'm afraid it can
The Big Bang really is a bit of a poor description of what is the generally accepted theory. It is more like the "Big Expansion".

Current theoretical calculations have the universe at the time of the Big Bang being about the size of a watermelon. Within a trillionth of a trillionth of a second the universe expanded a trillion trillion times (I know, my numbers are a bit vague ), this is what is typically referred to as the Big Bang. So it refers to a localised part of space of a particular size. Whether that is the entire universe at its birth or if it was infinite and an infinite amount of those watermelon sized areas rapidly expanded... We'll never know.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 19-05-2016, 10:11 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz View Post
we are definitely not alone - and I challenge anyone to prove otherwise .
We most definitely are alone! I also challenge you to prove me otherwise. Or, if we are not alone, I challenge you to find those leprechauns that have the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 19-05-2016, 10:18 PM
simmo's Avatar
simmo
Registered User

simmo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Perth
Posts: 288
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
If the universe began with the big bang, and is still expanding[even accelerating its rate of expansion] then by definition it can't be infinite.
raymo
Yes but are we just limiting things to our scale, big bang as an example? As there are atomic structure to us are we atomic size compared to a larger being/structure ?
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 19-05-2016, 10:19 PM
deanm (Dean)
Registered User

deanm is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 818
A watermelon?
Is that the bloody best the nascent universe could come up with?!
Oh well, next time...(& again..again..again..!)
Dean
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 19-05-2016, 10:25 PM
simmo's Avatar
simmo
Registered User

simmo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Perth
Posts: 288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
We most definitely are alone! I also challenge you to prove me otherwise. Or, if we are not alone, I challenge you to find those leprechauns that have the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow
I think Alex was on the right path with a theory of probability as a way to prove that life would exist somewhere. How could we exist if there was no way for life to exist in the universe that we know. You're argument that there could be no life elsewhere would preclude that we could not exist as a product.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 19-05-2016, 10:36 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
If the universe began with the big bang, and is still expanding[even accelerating its rate of expansion] then by definition it can't be infinite.
raymo
Raymo I have said such in the past.

I recall saying that whatever we take the singularity to represent it would be reasonable to consider that be finite both from size and just as importantly... time.

Yet Infinite knows no boundaries in dimention of any type.

No top, bottom or sides no begining or end.

So it would seem that no matter how many times we double the original singularity it can never ever... never never.. ever ever... become or approach infinite.

However I am not sure that mainstream considers the Universe to be finite.

I recall something of a discussion along the lines that the Universe could start as a singularity but become infinite but I am not sure.

Personally I think the Universe is infinite in the manner I suggest so I find it difficult to embrace the big bang theory even though I will be branded a crack pot or crank that is what I believe...

But from a science point of view clearly the big bang is the best model but it is a model it stands until it is replaced if indeed it can be replaced. And of course science offers models not truth... We do not know what is truth and we must not forget that most important fact.

I dont know what mainstream cosmology says about the finitness of the Universe but I think it is regarded as infinite.

If infinite probability is eliminated and the mere fact we exsist dictates that life, even inteligent life is infinite in number.
Maybe someone could comment on the mainstream view as to the infinity or not of the Universe.

Further there can be no outside to the Universe because we can never encounter nothing there must always be present something because nothing can never exist.
I am not joking but I know what I say is hard to follow and will at first seem not to make sence but it does and when you grasp what I am saying it will make your brain hurt.

Nothing is as close as we can get to the opposite of infinity. Nothing is not the opposite to something. Where you think you find nothing (for example the greatest voids we can observe we find a little part of everything in the Universe passing by. Strange but fact.

Alex
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 19-05-2016, 10:53 PM
Stonius's Avatar
Stonius (Markus)
Registered User

Stonius is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanm View Post
"Simple thought experiment; How many decimals lie between the integers 0 and 1? Answer, Infinity."

Agreed.

"Now how about between 0 and 2? Answer; 2 x infinity".

No, just infinity.

Infinity has no dimensions involving measures of time or space.

Dean.
Well, like I said, I'm no mathematician, but I think you'll find Cantor's work did show that some infinities are bigger than others over 100 years ago. His proof was more involved, but the thought experiment is how I visualise it. I believe he was posthumously awarded some pretty lofty honours in the field of mathematics.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 19-05-2016, 11:09 PM
deanm (Dean)
Registered User

deanm is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 818
Markus: I'm no mathematician either (I often run out of fingers!)..

But I can't envisage how there could be different scales of infinity.

I find it hard to conceive of "a bit of infinity, which isn't as infinite as that portion of infinity.."

Dean
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 20-05-2016, 03:09 AM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post

No top, bottom or sides no beginning or end.
Some late-hours musings. Is it argued or hypothesised that the singularity contained all that would become the present and expanding universe including the non-baryonic dark matter and/or dark energy? And a further question-without-notice: "Is dark matter expanding and accelerating along with the rest of us baryonic beasties? Or is dark matter itself a medium through which expansion is happening? "

The thought that gave birth to these questions was what, if anything was öutside" that watermelon before the expansion began - before the bang. Was dark matter compressed within the watermelon or was the melon enclosed within a medium comprising that which we have been calling dark matter etc? I guess I am exhibiting the ignorance of the untrained here. But that's the way it is.

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 20-05-2016, 08:19 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmrid View Post
Some late-hours musings. Is it argued or hypothesised that the singularity contained all that would become the present and expanding universe including the non-baryonic dark matter and/or dark energy? And a further question-without-notice: "Is dark matter expanding and accelerating along with the rest of us baryonic beasties? Or is dark matter itself a medium through which expansion is happening? "

The thought that gave birth to these questions was what, if anything was öutside" that watermelon before the expansion began - before the bang. Was dark matter compressed within the watermelon or was the melon enclosed within a medium comprising that which we have been calling dark matter etc? I guess I am exhibiting the ignorance of the untrained here. But that's the way it is.

Peter
Hi Peter I did not sleep on your questions I only saw them just now but I must say I dont know the answers.

I think mainstream has it that the singularity, which is the point where the maths breaks down as I understand it, is all there was and the big bang theory explains its evolution not its creation. My understanding of the theory has it that time and space began a split second before but there was nothing other than this singularity... No outside it was all that was to become everything.. Space and time are not dealt with at any earlier point.

The singularity is the Universe it is not contained in any medium there is no outside.

It then goes thru "inflation" growing to pretty well its current size in a split second. Further expansion followed over the following 13.6 billion years but that expansion would seem to me negligable in comparision to the inflationary instant. The time for inflation is mind numbingly short. The growth rate beyond comprehension for my little mind.

The big bang avoids the instant before inflation and leaves open the question of where and how the singularity appeared although there has been speculation from mainstream supporters that there was "quantum fluctuations" and that it was the ultimate free lunch. Or it came from nothing... So conveniently leaving creation out of the theory.

Personally I dont like the theory of inflation simply because my little mind can not imagine the growth rate suggested. I can not accept that the Universe could grow from zip to practically all, well it grew to more than what we see today which is our observable Universe, in a split second. I can not imagine a pin head growing to the size of the Earth, the solar system or the galaxy in under a second and I can not accept the Universe evolved this way. Nevertheless that is our current model and one must accept it will stand until a better model is presented that is how science works. Personally I find it hard to accept but I must while we wait for a better model.

Nevertheless without inflation theory the big bang theory would seem to fail as without that approach the theory seems that it must fail. Inflation was added to explain the sameness of the Universe.

I am not sure but I think our observable Universe is some 100 billion light year diameter but that just means that part of the Universe we can "see" and mainsream has it there is much more that is beyond our observation.

And to return to the matters raised in the op if we deal only with the observable Universe its observed size is enormous, we can quantify its size but I doubt if a human can grasp the enormity. So could it be the only life found is only us?

And there is more Universe beyond what we can observe arguably more than we observe possibly infinite... Well infinite would seal the deal life even inteligent life will be infinite..
We will never know but to think we are it demands a determination to avoid really addressing the numbers.

Someone said if we are it than the Universe has a lot of wasted space.

Alex
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 20-05-2016, 08:47 AM
rawbaws (Rory)
Registered User

rawbaws is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 3
Theres a few good videos on you tube that try to look at (not answer) some of these sorts of questions in a fun and easy to understand way. They are worth checking out if you haven't already stumbled across them

The Fermi Paradox -
Part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNhhvQGsMEc
Part 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fQkVqno-uI

Limits of Humanity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL4yYHdDSWs
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 20-05-2016, 09:13 AM
N1 (Mirko)
Registered User

N1 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Dunners Nu Zulland
Posts: 1,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanm View Post
"Simple thought experiment; How many decimals lie between the integers 0 and 1? Answer, Infinity."

Agreed.

"Now how about between 0 and 2? Answer; 2 x infinity".

No, just infinity.

Infinity has no dimensions involving measures of time or space.

Dean.
"Just infinity" it may be. However, the importance of this thought, and the key to understanding the likelihood of life elsewhere (to me) lies in its reversibility. If you double infinity, you have infinity. Therefore, if you half infinity, you also have infinity, however many times you do that. So a fraction of infinity, however small but greater than zero, should still be infinite. We know with absolute certainty that the incidence, and therefore likelihood, of life in the universe is greater than zero. Well you get the idea.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 20-05-2016, 09:16 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Thank you Rory.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 20-05-2016, 10:11 AM
AstralTraveller's Avatar
AstralTraveller (David)
Registered User

AstralTraveller is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 3,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
David I was not bored or stirring the pot.
.....
I dont wish to upset people but it seems I do at times and maybe this is one of those times.
...
Personally I believe the Universe probably is infinite if not bigger.
Alex
I'm not upset and don't mind the thought that there is intelligent life somewhere in the universe. In fact I'm rather hoping there is. It's just that bringing up this old chestnut indicates you felt like having a debate, possibly because you were bored.

I know what you mean about the size of the universe. It seems obvious that the universe must be bigger than human stupidity and, as far as I can see, that is unbounded.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 20-05-2016, 10:28 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Yesterday and the day before I had to focus on things other than the pending settlement of my new 100 acre dark site. So I was trying to get my mind off all that...
But happily all settled but I cant get to go there cause I have to stay in town.
Now I have time to be bored and open to debate anything everything and of course nothing.

I am here to remind people nutters like me are out there.

Have a great day I will I can feel the stress lifting even now. Thank goodness its is over. I have been trying to get this done for over three years.


I gave up on the place I was after and with that turkey out of my life can get back to trusting religious folk... A bitter experience and now I move on.

Thanks for extending me tolerence without knowing why I needed to let off steam.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 20-05-2016, 10:32 AM
Stonius's Avatar
Stonius (Markus)
Registered User

Stonius is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
The singularity is the Universe it is not contained in any medium there is no outside.
Alex
I always find this an interesting proposition as there's no way of knowing that 'nothing was outside'. There could have been, and could be still, but there is no way to know because we are stuck within the event horizon that is the observable universe. There could be universes bubbling into existence all the time as Lee Smolin suggested. We just wouldn't know it. Not being able to observe something doesn't mean it is definitely not there. Doesn't mean it's definitely there, either.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement