Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 25-02-2014, 12:26 PM
SkyViking's Avatar
SkyViking (Rolf)
Registered User

SkyViking is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waitakere Ranges, New Zealand
Posts: 2,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
That's very interesting (and good ) to hear Rolf. I need to tweak focus less with the AG12 (CF Tube) than I did with the Starfire (Al Tube)...night before last I did a 2hr image run up to the zenith (object in the perfect spot = didn't have to move the dome slit !!!) with no noticeable change in focus ~ 1120mmFL at F3.8, subs just got slightly sharper as the object climbed toward the zenith and the seeing improved .

Mike
My experience is identical Mike, the FWHM decreases steadily as the object rises towards the Zenith. At least we can say any focus shift is so little that FWHM doesn't increase

When it comes to truss versus tube OTA's I believe trusses are a lot more rigid. I would think even a CF tube sags a little bit under gravity, and in that case that's perhaps what causes focus shift rather than any temperature induced changes?

Of course a truss OTA will also sag to a degree, but I think it is less because of its stiffness. And in particular a Serrurier truss is designed with two truss segments to cancel out any sagging. While my OTA is not optimised with different truss tube thicknesses for each segment, I imagine it still benefits from this principle to some extent. Hence why it appears to need no focus adjustment throughout an imaging session.
But when that is said, even a fast Newtonian is more forgiving than the more complex optical designs. I don't know how this homemade OTA would fare if it housed a Cassegrain type system.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 08-05-2015, 08:32 PM
Logieberra's Avatar
Logieberra (Logan)
Registered User

Logieberra is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,644
Paul, re the secondary mirror and housing on the 12" GSOs, would you please confirm how the mirror is attached. Is it fixed, stuck flat up against the housing? If so, that might explain your tip that the secondary collimation on these should be 'finger tight'. Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 09-05-2015, 03:33 AM
Logieberra's Avatar
Logieberra (Logan)
Registered User

Logieberra is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,644
All good. Took it apart. The 3x secondary colli screws are well isolated from the secondary unit and mirror itself. Good to know. Tighten away
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 12-05-2015, 09:06 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logieberra View Post
All good. Took it apart. The 3x secondary colli screws are well isolated from the secondary unit and mirror itself. Good to know. Tighten away
I have never removed the secondary glass from its holder. I have removed the secondary from the secondary assembly via the threaded support before to install the dew heater into the secondary assembly. So I would not have been much help.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement