Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Terrestrial Photography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 10-10-2012, 10:39 PM
adman (Adam)
Seriously Amateur

adman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,279
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-10-2012, 01:12 PM
stardust steve's Avatar
stardust steve (Steve)
Registered User

stardust steve is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 779
They look great Adam. And what a big difference that white balance adjustment made. Good stuff.
Thanks for another great tip H
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-10-2012, 02:51 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
By helping others, I help myself. It's all good.

H
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 29-10-2012, 01:18 PM
adman (Adam)
Seriously Amateur

adman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,279
I have had yet another go at reprocessing some of these shots. I have just downloaded the trial of Lightroom 4, and I and quite impressed. Another learning curve...

There were some other shots that I didn't even try processing in photoshop, but after I saw what I could do with the others in Lightroom, I had a crack at some of (what I thought were) the more marginal ones.

I like these a lot better than than my first efforts.

link to dropbox album

Adam
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 29-10-2012, 01:29 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Very nice, Adam!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 29-10-2012, 01:36 PM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,838
Hi Adam,

Not sure how to describe it, there is a big difference in your repro's, but the rocks kind of look dry and more of a desert feel if you don't look at the ocean whereas the original one had the "wet" look on them as you'd expect from the water?
how close is your repro to the actual scene in your opinion?

just my personal opinion, I think the originals while they do have a stong blue hue, do look more powerful, but I do like number 3 in your dropbox album. that contrast is striking.
Nice work.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 29-10-2012, 03:05 PM
adman (Adam)
Seriously Amateur

adman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,279
thanks for looking guys!

Quote:
Originally Posted by alistairsam View Post
Hi Adam,

Not sure how to describe it, there is a big difference in your repro's, but the rocks kind of look dry and more of a desert feel if you don't look at the ocean whereas the original one had the "wet" look on them as you'd expect from the water?
how close is your repro to the actual scene in your opinion?

just my personal opinion, I think the originals while they do have a stong blue hue, do look more powerful, but I do like number 3 in your dropbox album. that contrast is striking.
Nice work.
Cheers
I kind of see what you mean in some of them, but looking back at the originals, there is no real 'wet look' sheen that has been lost in post-processing, so it must be the colours? I have attached the original for the number 3 shot so you can compare...

It is a very strange experience going back to a previously processed image after a while, and you see it through fresh eyes again - you pick up things that you couldnt see while you were working on it.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (2012-10-01__69A3199_Display.jpg)
142.5 KB13 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement