Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 30-05-2012, 10:50 AM
FlashDrive's Avatar
FlashDrive (Poppy)
Senior Citizen

FlashDrive is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bribie Island
Posts: 5,068
That's impressive ... very clear detail ... very nice indeed.
Well done Ken

Flash
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 30-05-2012, 10:58 AM
Suzy's Avatar
Suzy
Searching for Travolta...

Suzy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 3,700
Wow that's such an awesome pic!!!!
I've shared it with my facebook astro buddies- hope you don't mind.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 30-05-2012, 11:28 AM
madbadgalaxyman's Avatar
madbadgalaxyman (Robert)
Registered User

madbadgalaxyman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 936
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Crawford View Post

This image is of a galaxy that is well known but I have never imaged it. I was pleased to find details embedded in the core area that remind me of the disk of M104.
Ken,
your uncommonly fine image gives an excellent account of the morphology of the inner regions of this galaxy.

I absolutely agree about the similarity of the central region of this galaxy compared to M104, which has a gigantic bulge of old stars, compared to the small (and somewhat boxy) bulge component of NGC 4565. However, the planar disk component of these two galaxies may not be so different;
in both cases, one seems to be able to see all the way in to the very nuclear regions of the galaxy; so maybe these two galaxies actually have a dust ring rather than a filled-in disk of dust.
The "ring" of dust and the "seeing into the nuclear region" have been confirmed for the case of M104, but these qualities are also consistent with your optical-regime observations of N4565

cheers,
Robert

Madbadgalaxyman's question of the day:
What would NGC 4565 look like if it were seen face on?

Extinction by interstellar dust (within this galaxy) does not seem to be high, despite the evident Sb-Sc spiral galaxy morphology.
(In the case of M104, I and others have argued that it is actually an S0 galaxy with a dust ring. )

To me, in N4565, the small HII regions and the modest amounts of evident dust (despite the fact that this galaxy is foreshortened due to its orientation), provide evidence for a very modest rate of formation of (Massive & Luminous) OB stars in this galaxy. Small-bulged galaxies usually have a high star formation rate......but some don't have.

Last edited by madbadgalaxyman; 30-05-2012 at 11:43 AM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 30-05-2012, 04:50 PM
madbadgalaxyman's Avatar
madbadgalaxyman (Robert)
Registered User

madbadgalaxyman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 936
As mentioned in previous post, there seems to be a ring structure, seen nearly edge-on, in Ken's image.

I have just found an 8 micron image, which should mostly show the dust within this galaxy, and without most of the overlying clutter of population I material, and there is indeed a ring structure in this galaxy......

Here is the 8 micrometers image of this galaxy from the Spitzer Space Telescope:

Click image for larger version

Name:	N4565_8 microns__with Spitzer.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	44.5 KB
ID:	116141

I think I can give myself a "pat on the back" for good spotting in the more cluttered and entropic image at visible wavelengths!

There have been a couple of studies of the Near-infrared morphology of this galaxy, if anyone is interested.

Last edited by madbadgalaxyman; 30-05-2012 at 04:51 PM. Reason: more
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 30-05-2012, 05:46 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Nice natural and slick processing Ken. There is a real sense of three dimension involved in this image. Lovely image.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 30-05-2012, 05:48 PM
Suzy's Avatar
Suzy
Searching for Travolta...

Suzy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 3,700
Robert I may be getting good at this stuff yet!
I studied that pic before you posted and I scratched my head over it saying to myself "hey... you look just like the structure of M104..."
Could the student be surpassing the teacher (you! ) ......
nooooooo long ways to go!

Quote:
I think I can give myself a "pat on the back" for good spotting in the more cluttered and entropic image at visible wavelengths!
Do so! You deserve it our Mr Galaxy Man!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 31-05-2012, 12:01 AM
Ken Crawford's Avatar
Ken Crawford (KenC)
Ken Crawford

Ken Crawford is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Camino, Ca USA
Posts: 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by madbadgalaxyman View Post
As mentioned in previous post, there seems to be a ring structure, seen nearly edge-on, in Ken's image.

I have just found an 8 micron image, which should mostly show the dust within this galaxy, and without most of the overlying clutter of population I material, and there is indeed a ring structure in this galaxy......

Here is the 8 micrometers image of this galaxy from the Spitzer Space Telescope:

Attachment 116141

I think I can give myself a "pat on the back" for good spotting in the more cluttered and entropic image at visible wavelengths!

There have been a couple of studies of the Near-infrared morphology of this galaxy, if anyone is interested.
Very Cool! Thanks for pointing this out as it makes what I saw in the processing easier to understand! I have always looked at imaging processing like space exploration as if you dig deep enough you sometimes see things you have not seen as well before. The slight warp to the galaxy shows a past interaction and I did look for star streams in the data but could not find any.

Thanks again for posting the interesting data on this amazing galaxy.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 31-05-2012, 01:00 AM
madbadgalaxyman's Avatar
madbadgalaxyman (Robert)
Registered User

madbadgalaxyman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 936
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Crawford View Post
Very Cool! Thanks for pointing this out as it makes what I saw in the processing easier to understand! I have always looked at imaging processing like space exploration as if you dig deep enough you sometimes see things you have not seen as well before. The slight warp to the galaxy shows a past interaction and I did look for star streams in the data but could not find any.

Thanks again for posting the interesting data on this amazing galaxy.
Hello Ken,

The grainy old chemical-process images in the Carnegie Atlas of Galaxies were useful for a rough and ready analysis of three-dimensional structures found within galaxies, but high resolution amateur CCD imaging such as yours can definitely shed much more light on the details of the morphology. (not the least because of the much greater dynamic range)

I am glad you found the Spitzer 8 micron view to be interesting!

Here is an NIR view from 2MASS. This image is shortwards of 3 microns, so what is being detected in this image is nearly all stellar light rather than gas and dust. The narrowness of the dust lane in front of the bulge is very evident, as is an interesting central concentration of light (or circum-nuclear feature) that is nested within the larger bulge.
Both the narrow dust lane and the central morphological feature are evident in your image, but they are more obvious in this Low Extinction near-infrared regime:

Click image for larger version

Name:	N4565_J+H+K___(from 2MASS)__(1).jpg
Views:	32
Size:	124.8 KB
ID:	116166

"Just for fun and profit", I also attach the Far Ultraviolet + Near Ultraviolet image from GALEX. This looks decidedly odd, but some of the asymmetry may be due to variations in the very strong extinction of ultraviolet light by dust.

Click image for larger version

Name:	N4565_FUV+NUV___(with GALEX).jpg
Views:	29
Size:	185.8 KB
ID:	116167

___________________________________ _
I will see if I can dig up some more enlightenment about this galaxy from a couple of recent infrared papers about it. I have got some hunches about N4565, but I think I really need to overlay some images at various wavelengths.
___________________________________ __

Note added in later edit:

And look how boxy the bulge is, especially in the near-infrared image......these "bulges" are sometimes not real bulges (that is, spheroids), but instead are actually bar structures that are seen edge-on. It may be that N4565 is much later in the Hubble Sequence then we think it is, as this may not be a real bulge, but instead a pseudo-bulge.

There are various gradations found in galaxies between a genuinely spheroidal bulge (which is oblate spheroidal in shape), and a bar, and a "weak bar" which is just a slightly elongated bulge ("hot dog bun" shaped).
Our own Milky Way has a bulge which is also a weak bar, so this is sometimes called a "Bulge/Bar", just to confuse things further.

Added in a Second edit:

Madbadgalaxyman's puzzlers of the day:
Could the boxy "apparent bulge" that we see in our two-dimensional (flat) images be simply a bar that is seen edge-on, and not a spheroidally-shaped bulge?
Could the very-compact spheroidal structure that is nested within this "pseudo-bulge" be the real bulge of this galaxy?
Are we actually looking at a galaxy with a very very small bulge?

Last edited by madbadgalaxyman; 01-06-2012 at 10:08 AM. Reason: more
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 31-05-2012, 10:26 AM
madbadgalaxyman's Avatar
madbadgalaxyman (Robert)
Registered User

madbadgalaxyman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 936
Oh, and just one more thing, it seems that our ability to see into the very centre of NGC 4565 is not just an illusion. There is an extant Hubble Space Telescope image in the near-ultraviolet at 3300 Angstroms that clearly shows the Seyfert nucleus of this galaxy:
(or at least the immediate area of stars just adjoining the nucleus)

Click image for larger version

Name:	N4565_NUV(3300 Angstr)__(w. HST ACS)__(2007__AJ_134_648)__a Seyfert).jpg
Views:	27
Size:	160.4 KB
ID:	116173

We are often able to see in to the very centre of galaxies which are low in their dust content (e.g. type S0 galaxies, and ellipticals) but this is an edge-on non-dwarf spiral galaxy, so the dust ring hypothesis is strongly indicated in the case of N4565.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 31-05-2012, 10:42 AM
madbadgalaxyman's Avatar
madbadgalaxyman (Robert)
Registered User

madbadgalaxyman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 936
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suzy View Post
Robert I may be getting good at this stuff yet!
I studied that pic before you posted and I scratched my head over it saying to myself "hey... you look just like the structure of M104..."
Good work, Suzy. You are looking at galaxies like a morphologist.

In other words, you are trying to work out what is actually out there, in three-dimensional real space.

In my highly eccentric opinion, this approach sure beats "Oohing and Aahing" at the prettiness of a galaxy, forever and ever, but then some people do say that extra-terrestrials like myself are lacking in emotion.

cheers,
Rob

Last edited by madbadgalaxyman; 01-06-2012 at 10:02 AM. Reason: typos, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 31-05-2012, 06:20 PM
stevous67 (Steve M)
Registered User

stevous67 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 633
Outstanding image. One like Martin's in quality, and one for us to all aspire to.

Thank you for sharing - it's a high bar...


Steve
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 31-05-2012, 06:23 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
This is a great galaxy image Ken and we can always trust Mad Bad Robo to give some interesting commentary...particularly on galaxies

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-06-2012, 02:37 PM
Ken Crawford's Avatar
Ken Crawford (KenC)
Ken Crawford

Ken Crawford is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Camino, Ca USA
Posts: 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
This is a great galaxy image Ken and we can always trust Mad Bad Robo to give some interesting commentary...particularly on galaxies

Mike
Yes, and I enjoyed it! Great to hear from you Mike - hope you been getting some clear skies somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-06-2012, 08:10 PM
E_ri_k (Erik)
Registered User

E_ri_k is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lakes Entrance
Posts: 846
Wow thats fantastic. Well done!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement