Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 22-05-2012, 12:39 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
These are excellent David!

My fav is the coal sack and dark doodad

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 22-05-2012, 01:01 PM
MrB's Avatar
MrB (Simon)
Old Man Yells at Cloud

MrB is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rockingham WA
Posts: 3,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerg View Post
It's the colour I'm surprised at .. I think you have very good processing skills, to be able to bring out the colour without making it look too higher contrast or too over processed
Agreed.
I'm still learning, can just do the basics, but I had a quick go with the single sub Dave posted and couldn't coax much out of it.
Would be great if Dave could run thru his processing procedure
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 22-05-2012, 06:59 PM
naskies's Avatar
naskies (Dave)
Registered User

naskies is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,865
Wow, thanks for all the positive comments! Seems like most people on here image either at >= 500 mm focal length, or <= 24 mm... hopefully this can be my little niche

Simon - err yep, I did indeed sell the Astrotrac , but then I bought it back in exchange for something else... long story! I then sold my EQ6 but now that I'm hitting my head against the AT's limitations I'm regretting that too

Mike - thanks! The Coalsack + Dark Doodad is my favourite too... I'm a huge fan of dark nebulae.

I think you guys give me too much credit for the processing (it's rather rudimentary at the moment), but here's what I did (from memory):

Step 1. Lightroom RAW conversion:
* turn off all automatic processing (brightness/contrast/black point/etc)
* set manual white balance
* enable lens profile correction and adjust settings
* reset contrast curve to linear
* export as 16-bit TIFFs for import into Deep Sky Stacker
* repeat for darks/flats/bias/etc frames.

Step 2. Deep Sky Stacker stacking:
* load light/flats/dark flats/darks/bias frames
* tweak the star detection threshold to aim for about 1000 detected stars (too few seems to result in incorrect alignment, same with too many - or it crashes DSS)
* use the middle light frame as reference
* stack 100% of the light frames and see what the result looks like
* if the stars aren't pinpoint across the field (i.e. alignment errors), then figure out what went wrong and/or which light frames to omit
* for the Rho Ophiuchi shots, I had to drop 4 frames for it to stack perfectly

Step 3. Deep Sky Stacker stretching and curves:
* click the checkbox to move RGB sliders simultaneously
* increase the black point until any clipping starts to occur (i.e. you see a pixel in any channel appear at 0/black on the histogram)
* unclick the above checkbox, and each the black point for the other channels so that the RGB peaks all line up
* click apply to see what the data looks like (you may have to adjust the midpoint slider of the curve so that it's not too bright/dark) - make sure the dark nebulosity isn't clipped
* leave the white point alone as the bright stars are already overexposed
* set saturation to 20% (there will be a huge colour cast over the image) and then carefully tweak the black points of each RGB channel to cancel out the colour cast
* fiddle around with the curves sliders to get a nice balance and contrast between background, dark nebulosity, bright nebulosity, and stars
* tweak saturation slider
* export as 32-bit TIFF

Step 4. Photoshop tweaking:
* mask any edges or corners that didn't get flat-corrected properly
* clone out the dust spot in the corner that didn't get flat corrected
* perform a fine-grained Levels or Curves (as 16 bit image) tweak
* vibrance/saturation tweak to boost colour of nebulosity
* boost red+magenta channel saturation to compensate for reduced H-alpha (e.g. somewhere between +15 to +30)
* convert to 16-bit using exposure 0 gamma 1
* resize image, e.g. 1200x800 for web
* apply local contrast enhancement of dark dust lanes and nebulosity (e.g. unsharp mask with settings 12%, 12 px, 0)
* export as JPG

That's it! It's all really quite straightforward, perhaps except for the stretching and curves step in DSS. It's a very, very finicky step where even just having a slider a couple of pixels in the wrong position messes up the whole image.

When the curves sliders are set right, you can adjust the dark dust, nebulosity, star intensity, and star field background individually on separate sliders.

If you'd like to give it a go yourself on my data, you're very welcome:

* RAW file from a single sub taken with my SLR (28 MB)
* converted TIFF file from Lightroom - one sub (result of Step 1) (126 MB)
* stack of 31 subs from DSS - no curves/stretching (result of Step 2) (202 MB) - download and load this file into DSS if you want to play with stretching/curves
* output TIFF from DSS after stretching and curves (result of Step 3) (125 MB)

Enjoy!

Last edited by naskies; 23-05-2012 at 08:46 AM. Reason: added 32 bit conversion step
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 22-05-2012, 07:16 PM
CapturingTheNight's Avatar
CapturingTheNight (Greg)
Registered User

CapturingTheNight is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Holbrook, NSW
Posts: 1,230
Guess what I'm doing this weekend? Reprocessing some widefield images.
Thank you so much for the write up on your image processing Dave. That's incredibly kind of you
Not sure if my data will be as good as your initial data but can't wait to see if I can dig some more out of my images with this process.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 22-05-2012, 09:03 PM
MrB's Avatar
MrB (Simon)
Old Man Yells at Cloud

MrB is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rockingham WA
Posts: 3,435
You are a legend Dave, definitely giving your processing a go, cheers!

I've been ummming and ahhhhing about the AT for some time now, expensive for what it is, but I'm pretty much about to bite the bullet!
If you're considering selling again, I'm interested! haha

Quote:
Originally Posted by obsidianphotos View Post
Guess what I'm doing this weekend? Reprocessing some widefield images.
Thank you so much for the write up on your image processing Dave. That's incredibly kind of you
Too right Greg! I'll be doing the same.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 22-05-2012, 09:56 PM
stevous67 (Steve M)
Registered User

stevous67 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 633
Great job dave, beautiful colours and nicely captured.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 22-05-2012, 11:44 PM
DavidTrap's Avatar
DavidTrap (David)
Really just a beginner

DavidTrap is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,045
Dave - what is a fine grained levels or curve tweak?

Thanks again for the processing recipe!

DT
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 23-05-2012, 01:09 AM
dvj's Avatar
dvj (John)
Registered User

dvj is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 755
I gather then that I would not be disappointed in the 5D MK II if I got one for the Venus transit? I know the MK III is out but pricy.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 23-05-2012, 01:12 AM
dvj's Avatar
dvj (John)
Registered User

dvj is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by naskies View Post
Wow, thanks for all the positive comments! Seems like most people on here image either at >= 500 mm focal length, or <= 24 mm... hopefully this can be my little niche

Simon - err yep, I did indeed sell the Astrotrac , but then I bought it back in exchange for something else... long story! I then sold my EQ6 but now that I'm hitting my head against the AT's limitations I'm regretting that too

Mike - thanks! The Coalsack + Dark Doodad is my favourite too... I'm a huge fan of dark nebulae.

I think you guys give me too much credit for the processing (it's rather rudimentary at the moment), but here's what I did (from memory):

Step 1. Lightroom RAW conversion:
* turn off all automatic processing (brightness/contrast/black point/etc)
* set manual white balance
* enable lens profile correction and adjust settings
* reset contrast curve to linear
* export as 16-bit TIFFs for import into Deep Sky Stacker
* repeat for darks/flats/bias/etc frames.

Step 2. Deep Sky Stacker stacking:
* load light/flats/dark flats/darks/bias frames
* tweak the star detection threshold to aim for about 1000 detected stars (too few seems to result in incorrect alignment, same with too many - or it crashes DSS)
* use the middle light frame as reference
* stack 100% of the light frames and see what the result looks like
* if the stars aren't pinpoint across the field (i.e. alignment errors), then figure out what went wrong and/or which light frames to omit
* for the Rho Ophiuchi shots, I had to drop 4 frames for it to stack perfectly

Step 3. Deep Sky Stacker stretching and curves:
* click the checkbox to move RGB sliders simultaneously
* increase the black point until any clipping starts to occur (i.e. you see a pixel in any channel appear at 0/black on the histogram)
* unclick the above checkbox, and each the black point for the other channels so that the RGB peaks all line up
* click apply to see what the data looks like (you may have to adjust the midpoint slider of the curve so that it's not too bright/dark) - make sure the dark nebulosity isn't clipped
* leave the white point alone as the bright stars are already overexposed
* set saturation to 20% (there will be a huge colour cast over the image) and then carefully tweak the black points of each RGB channel to cancel out the colour cast
* fiddle around with the curves sliders to get a nice balance and contrast between background, dark nebulosity, bright nebulosity, and stars
* tweak saturation slider
* export as TIFF

Step 4. Photoshop tweaking:
* mask any edges or corners that didn't get flat-corrected properly
* clone out the dust spot in the corner that didn't get flat corrected
* perform a fine-grained Levels or Curves tweak
* vibrance/saturation tweak to boost colour of nebulosity
* boost red+magenta channel saturation to compensate for reduced H-alpha (e.g. somewhere between +15 to +30)
* resize image, e.g. 1200x800 for web
* apply local contrast enhancement of dark dust lanes and nebulosity (e.g. unsharp mask with settings 12%, 12 px, 0)
* export as JPG

That's it! It's all really quite straightforward, perhaps except for the stretching and curves step in DSS. It's a very, very finicky step where even just having a slider a couple of pixels in the wrong position messes up the whole image.

When the curves sliders are set right, you can adjust the dark dust, nebulosity, star intensity, and star field background individually on separate sliders.

If you'd like to give it a go yourself on my data, you're very welcome:

* RAW file from a single sub taken with my SLR (28 MB)
* converted TIFF file from Lightroom - one sub (result of Step 1) (126 MB)
* stack of 31 subs from DSS - no curves/stretching (result of Step 2) (202 MB) - download and load this file into DSS if you want to play with stretching/curves
* output TIFF from DSS after stretching and curves (result of Step 3) (125 MB)

Enjoy!
Thank you for posting this. This is more information than I get at the annual AIC conference in San Jose. They totally blow off digital camera photography as not being "advanced".
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 23-05-2012, 08:54 AM
naskies's Avatar
naskies (Dave)
Registered User

naskies is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,865
Cheers guys - hope this helps. I'm sure there are better ways of processing (please tell me if you know how!) but this works for me.

John - the 5DmkII is an awesome camera, except for the focusing system. Since I don't shoot action (mainly portraits + astro) I probably won't be upgrading anytime soon... bigger mount and scope first! :-)

David - the levels slider in DSS only lets you set whole numbers (0, 1, 2, 3, ...) and not fractions (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, ...) so sometimes I'm unable to subtract the skyglow without leaving a colour cast - eg my example image from DSS is a bit green. Once I open it in Photoshop, I apply levels only to fine tune the skyglow subtraction.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 23-05-2012, 09:29 AM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Thanks Dave for your processing recipe, makes my recipe seem like "two minute noodles" in comparison. So will be saving yours to favorites and gives me much to work on. All the best.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement