Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Celestial and Astronomical Events
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 24-03-2012, 08:19 PM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
I hear you Ron , but aint a supernova Visual astronomy ? .
Sorry , but its now being seen now in small telescopes , world wide .
Brian.
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
We have a dedicated forum for Observing Reports, It would be appreciated if observers of the Supernova would post their observations there.
We have two threads going on this
Cheers

PS Brian you put your Supernova Alert on the observational and visual Astronomy.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 25-03-2012, 12:24 AM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian nordstrom View Post
I hear you Ron , but aint a supernova Visual astronomy ? .
Sorry , but its now being seen now in small telescopes , world wide .
Brian.
Brian this thread is not visual astronomy it is Celestial and astronomical events, and people are posting their observing reports on this thread instead of the Observing reports page .
Your Alert is on the observing thread page .
You posted this

Quote

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/..../shrugging.gif lost my heads up here ? anyway a new Super nova , spotted in M95 , last time I posted this , it was mag. 12.9 . last seen under mag .12. Around 5 hours ago I put a SV Alert .. on this . ..http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/..../confused2.gif.
Brian

Again your alert is on the observing page so you didn't loose it you just posted it somewhere else.
It pays to look around or go to your profile and see what posts you have started and it will tell you where you posted it
If you do manage to see the Supernova, (one word by the way) Could you please post it on the observation page Not this thread.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 25-03-2012, 12:49 AM
Gem's Avatar
Gem (Grant)
The serenity...

Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 926
lol
I went to image M95 tonight not knowing about the SN. I couldn't find an adequate guide star, and so did a couple of 10 second exposures to just check it was there... then moved on. Regret it now!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 25-03-2012, 05:03 AM
skysurfer's Avatar
skysurfer
Dark sky rules !

skysurfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 33S 150E (AU holiday)
Posts: 1,181
This week I saw it with my 25cm Dob, I checked with Skysafari on which the star south of the galaxy was missing.

I took a picture as well: 15 frames each 30 sec iso 3200 with Televue Genesis prime focus with Canon 7d. The green circle shows where the SN is. Mars is top right (north up).


http://www.northsouthsky.com/skypics...w-20120321.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 26-03-2012, 07:21 PM
Suzy's Avatar
Suzy
Searching for Travolta...

Suzy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 3,700
There seems to be some confusion where to post reports- I've just done a report in the obs forum but will copy and paste it here to keep in line with other reports here.


I observed the the sn in M95 last night and what a huge thrill it was! This is the first supernova that I've seen through my telescope.

Here is my report:


25/3/12 10pm

Equipment: 10" dob. EP: Pentax XW10mm using 140X mag.
Location: Light polluted backyard.
Guide: Starry Night Pro software and this helpful map here. Click image for larger version

Name:	SN in M95 March 2012.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	140.2 KB
ID:	111739


The galaxy was quite easy to find, being only one deg away from Mars.

The XW is a 70 deg ep, so I put Mars just to the outside of the middle left edge just outside the fov and sweeped slowly right and despite not having dark adapted my eyes, added to the fact that just at that time, hubby was fixing the garage door so I had the bright light inside garage glaring straight at me only 10 feet away , I was able to nab this galaxy quite easily. No spiral arms visible- it was all core (quite large too), surrounded by fuzz. Couldn't find the SN at that stage.. looking... looking... nothing. And all of a sudden after about 10 minutes there it was. Clearly, my eyes had to dark adapt and what a difference that made. It was the difference between it being there and not! I didn't need to use averted vision- was quite obvious.
If I didn't know any better about this sn being there, I would have mistaken the sn for another galaxy. But I had every star within the field accounted for to know and confirm this was indeed a galaxy and sn. To me, both looked like elliptical galaxies because of the lack of spiral structure and showing just a diffuse glow.

I was surprised to see the sn so far away from the core. It made me quite aware, despite this being some 38 million light years away and so far away and small to my eye- just how large the galaxy actually is as it shows where the sn sits on the end of it.
The SN sat above the galaxy in the eyepiece and is smaller than the core of the galaxy, though not by much I thought. For the first time (despite seen plenty of sn pics), I became truly aware when looking through my own telescope of just how gigantic a supernova is compared to the core of its residing galaxy. It was an exhilarating experience eyeballing it myself.

After observing it for a good solid half hour, transparency then killed it. Both completely disappeared out of view- just leaving the stars behind in the field. Then they came back and then they disappeared. The first to disappear was the sn.

Two tiny groups of triangular shaped asterisms grabbed my attention- they looked identical in size and shape. Three large stars point in an arrow to the sn as if it was announcing "here it is" . To the right of sn, one bright star sits on the same line of sight as galaxy.

I think perhaps a good clear night is needed to view this. I'd perhaps recommend trying for it and if you don't see it, observe something else and keep coming back to it until you see it. Just don't give up if you don't see it the first time. Trust me, when you see it, it'll be worth the effort. But above all- it is important that you have your eyes dark adapted as mentioned before.

I'm certain an 8" will grab this from a light polluted backyard, tho I think it could be on the limits, but I feel certain you'll grab something. I'd be interested to hear some reports?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 26-03-2012, 07:43 PM
Shark Bait's Avatar
Shark Bait (Stu)
'ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha'

Shark Bait is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,017
Great report Suzy. Your enthusiasm is contagious. I will get outside and hunt down this SN.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 26-03-2012, 09:30 PM
Suzy's Avatar
Suzy
Searching for Travolta...

Suzy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia.
Posts: 3,700
Thanks Stu.

Yes yes go outside, it's not to be missed!

I look forward to your report.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 26-03-2012, 10:03 PM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
Alright Suzy !! . Good on you , aint an astronomical first something to be proud of ? especially a Super Nova , the first of many now ?
Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 26-03-2012, 10:15 PM
andyc's Avatar
andyc (Andy)
Registered User

andyc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,008
Got it with 8"!

SN was visible with surprising clarity with an 8" from my backyard in suburban Melbourne. It's the first supernova I've ever observed too, having just missed out on the northern ones last year (summer twilight at 56N is bright!) before moving south.

Equipment was an 8" dob, sky conditions were respectable for the 'burbs. The galaxy M95 was clear if quite faint at 100x, and less distinct than either M96 or M105 and it's companion. The SN was in and out on the edge of visibility, but in good spells was a clear little speck in the right place in relation to two nearby stars and the galaxy's core. Using a chart generated from AAVSO, I'd say it was in the mag 12.5-12.8 range, just a little fainter than two other nearby 12.4/12.5 field stars.

Quite amazing to think how cataclysmic that little speck actually is, go have a look!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 26-03-2012, 10:31 PM
Zubenel's Avatar
Zubenel (Wes)
Awe and Wonder

Zubenel is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SE QLD
Posts: 594
Great report Suzy ,
I had the pleasure of seeing this one through Ron's on Saturday night.Very obvious down to 51 Times with the 35mm pan. I show my eldest lad from the front yard through the 10" F5 tonight. Averted vision and used the 12mm Type4 Nag gave the best view. The light pollution does a job on the seen compared to Ron's .Who would have thought you could see an SN from the Suburban Fringe !! Cheers Zub
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 26-03-2012, 10:41 PM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
If its fine tomorrow night I might go south for 30 -40km and set up my 127mm triplet and have a go from some really dark NT skies , heres hoping ?? .
Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 27-03-2012, 03:08 PM
Giorgio
Registered User

Giorgio is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toowoomba QLD Australia
Posts: 96
Thanks to Suzy, who let me know about this sn, I got last night the opportunity to look for it.

Last night the sky here in Toowoomba was really good (a real rarety lately... ) and following her precise instructions I found quickly m95 (using my 12" Lightbridge dob).

However it was very faint and I could spot it only with my 2 longer focal EPs (Meade 26mm and GSO SV 50mm).
When I tried to get closer with the other EPs (Skywatcher 13mm, and the just arrived 7mm Nagler ), it wasn't there anymore...

I guess light pollution up here should be less an issue than in Brisbane, but sadly to observe at Mars I have to set the scope in direct line of sight of a bright street light about 30mt away
Also I thought that maybe the sky above me actually wasn't as clean as it looked to me. But I'm not able yet to properly assess its real observing conditions, so this is just a long shot trying to explain what was not right. Moreover, I washed both the primary and secondary just 2 days ago. Although they are not new and has several bad spots (some fungus and nasty dirt hard bits), they are very little and while a recoating would surely be nice, in my understanding I can live without it for the time being. I definetly exclude collimation problems, as I did it one each time I moved the dob around the backyard (it sits on a 4 wheels trolley).

Hope to be able bringing the dob in a real dark sky location soon so finally being able to enjoy a glimpse to this new jewel (and of course many other beauties up there).

However, the night wasn't wasted. The Nagler delivered some of the best views I ever had to the usual beauty up there with Omega Centaury and Saturn views by far the best ones


Cheers

Last edited by Giorgio; 27-03-2012 at 03:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-04-2012, 09:34 PM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
Good to hear Georgio , nothing like a good night after weeks ( months ) of cloudy nights , yea mate those Naglers are special alright , glad you got one now .
Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 15-04-2012, 10:44 PM
Mariner (Frank)
Registered User

Mariner is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Wamberal, NSW, Australia
Posts: 52
Wow, just saw this post and will be home from sea in a few days to have a look for myself - can't wait. Must break out the 12" dob to get this one I think.

Will it still be good to look at towards the end of the week???

Hope so.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 16-04-2012, 07:49 AM
Greg Bock's Avatar
Greg Bock (Greg Bock)
Registered User

Greg Bock is online now
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 377
Hi guys

for a comprehensive list of magnitudes for the SN, go to the M95 sub-page here at
http://www.rochesterastronomy.org/sn2012/sn2012aw.html.

You'll see that as of the 13th April, its still around Magnitude 13.3 V. So, it will be bright enough visually for most people with at least an 8" to 10" scope under dark skies.

If the clouds let me, i'll take another image this week and leave it here for comparison with my last image taken on 21 March.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 16-04-2012, 03:00 PM
andyc's Avatar
andyc (Andy)
Registered User

andyc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,008
I saw the SN again a few nights ago from Melbourne (8" Dob), teetering on the edge of visibility and definitely a bit fainter than a few weeks ago, even when the nearby galaxies (M95, M96, M105, NGC3384) were comparably visible. Should be easy from a dark sky with and 8", and still straightforward with larger apertures in urban skies. 13.3 is probably reasonable, maybe a bit faint as a magnitude estimate (maybe more like 13?), but I didn't do a proper estimate!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement