Quote:
Originally Posted by Brundah1
Thanks Gary for posting this excellent record of the huge challenges facing the American Space Program as they worked to achieve JFK's 1960 comittment.
There is a wealth of information on the NASA website.
|
Hi David,
Great to hear the anecdote about your friend Jim and his family being lucky enough
to witness the Apollo 17 launch!
And Asquith is just down the road here.
Also great to hear you can bury yourself in the NASA online resource.
The companion volume to "Stages for Saturn" is "Chariots for Apollo: A History
of Manned Lunar Spacecraft" and it is available online here -
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4205/cover.html
For example, It details many of the decisions made including the final decision to go for
lunar-orbit rendezvous (LOR), which seemed outlandish to many NASA planners
in the late 50's and early 60's, compared to other methods in getting there,
including direct ascent and its major competitor, Earth orbit rendezvous (EOR).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chariots for Apollo. Chapter 3-2
At a meeting in Washington in mid-1960, the first NASA Administrator, Keith Glennan, had asked how a spacecraft might be landed on the moon. Max Faget of the Space Task Group had described a mission in which the spacecraft would first orbit the moon and then land, either in an upright position on deployable legs or horizontally using skids on the descent stage . Wernher von Braun of Marshall and William Pickering of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory JPL thought it would be unnecessary to orbit the moon first. As Faget recalled, "Dr. Pickering [said] you don't have to go into orbit; . . . you just aim at the moon and, when you get close enough, turn on the landing rockets and come straight in. . . . I thought that would be a pretty unhappy day if, when you lit up the rockets, they didn't light."
|