Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Terrestrial Photography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 20-05-2011, 08:36 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Thanks for the kind comments Chris

A "lowly L"? Hmmm.. not really sure about that. Giving it a 9/10 and a "lowly" label is probably a little confusing to their readers. Personally, I love it for its ability to stay on the front of my camera for most situations I find myself photographing. Terrestrially, it's just a great all-round lens. It's quick to focus and the actions are all smooth. I notice that when I open a shot in DPP and apply its table-driven aberration correction routine to the shot, the result moves ever-so-slightly at the edges on the long sides. Given that, it shows that there is a very slight correction to square, but it's hardly noticeable. A few pixels at most.

I've had it on my QHY-9, piggybacked on the Taks, and found that at the extreme corners it did seagull a little. Nothing a 90% crop wouldn't fix. I didn't buy it for this purpose though - and assert that prime lenses are more designed for this type of duty rather then all-rounder zooms.

My score? 9 too.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 20-05-2011, 09:01 AM
hotspur's Avatar
hotspur (Chris)
Registered User

hotspur is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: south east QLD,Australia
Posts: 2,869
re lens

Yes,Chris-I found the FM review on the lens a bit confusing,I have heard many say its a great lens,a friend was looking at buying one,so I was wondering what they were like.I imagine it would be ideal lens on the 5d2 for most use generally.Just not sure how it would be on a 50D.The images from your beach excursions certainly show so very fine images from it.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 20-05-2011, 09:21 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Come to think of it Chris, Mike Salway would be the bloke to ask. I know that he bought one for his 40Ds after borrowing Humayun's 24-105 during a shoot a while back. While I find it great on the 5D-II, he'd give you his opinion of it on a DX camera. I gather that he was impressed enough to go for it.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 20-05-2011, 09:25 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I love it. I did buy it after borrowing H's for a wedding shoot back in 2009.

It's always on my camera (40D).

The only time I take it off is to put the 17-70 on when I need a wider field of view.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 20-05-2011, 01:26 PM
hotspur's Avatar
hotspur (Chris)
Registered User

hotspur is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: south east QLD,Australia
Posts: 2,869
re 24-105

Thank you for your thoughts on the lens,Mike and Chris.

I think sometimes,on various other review forums,people look at every angle of a product,and find some sort of minor fault and tend to harp on it a bit.Rather than actually going out into the field and using it regularly,and seeing what results are gained.

Sounds like a good 'all rounder',does it come with a hood when you buy it,or is that another 'canon extra'?.I can't say I've ever seen any images of it with a hood on.

Reason for asking thoughts,I have a Canon 10-22 mm lens I bought in October 2010,and have only used it three times,its not getting as much use as I thought it would,I seem to use my 17-55 much more (I love this lens-its certainly no L,but great for wide field,its earned a permanent place in my camera bag),But the 10-22 mm great quality,but infreqeunt use,make me wonder if a 24-105 would get more use.Might think about selling the 10-22 mm.

Cheers Chris

Last edited by hotspur; 20-05-2011 at 01:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 20-05-2011, 01:52 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Sounds like a good idea Chris - besides, the 10-22 EF-S isn't going to be much good on a 5D Mk-X later on.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 20-05-2011, 02:01 PM
hotspur's Avatar
hotspur (Chris)
Registered User

hotspur is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: south east QLD,Australia
Posts: 2,869
re lens

Yes Chris-was thinking that too,pondering the 7D vrs the 5d2 question lately too-looking at the 5D2 option,so that is the other reason for asking.

cheers Chris
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 20-05-2011, 06:53 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
They are really something. The creamy 'terracotta' sand against the blue sky does it for me.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 20-05-2011, 09:45 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Thanks so much Rowland. The colour of this sand appeals to me as well. I guess that it is basalt-based, as this is the colour of the rocks and surrounding soil on my property in Cooma.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 21-05-2011, 12:33 PM
bananarama's Avatar
bananarama (Deb)
Registered User

bananarama is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cobargo NSW
Posts: 9
Quote:
Thank you Deb! You should come along one evening!
Only if you don't ask me to model.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 24-05-2011, 12:33 AM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
You boys are producing very nice work with those 5D MkII's
Kudos!!!

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 24-05-2011, 07:06 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Deb - I'll wait until your leg is better. The crutches may be good props in one sense, but...

Doug - thanks so much Yes, I took Humayun's advice some time back and bought the 5D-II. It is a stellar performer, it really is. Do I feel a pull to the Mark III? Not at all - I'll be forever reaching the limits of this camera, if I ever reach them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement