Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 01-05-2011, 11:13 AM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Very nice Rob....just need to neutralize the background.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-05-2011, 02:59 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by lesbehrens View Post
wow. very nice image. you do some good work.
Thanks for that Les. Long time no see - may be a chance to see what you're up to at Astrofest perhaps?

Quote:
Originally Posted by atalas View Post
Very nice Rob....just need to neutralize the background.
Must confess I obsessed more in the galaxies than the background Rich - will have to check out the histogram a bit more. This one has seen lashings of Pixinsights dynamic background correction to tame the poorly fitting flats and resulting ringing/vignetting.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-05-2011, 08:40 AM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Very nice Rob. You just managed to squeeze the three into the frame.
I bet it took you some effort to get the framing just right. Good detail and I love the colours in the galaxies. Is it worth selectively sharpening the dust lane in the vertical galaxy a bit more?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-05-2011, 06:47 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar View Post
Very nice Rob. You just managed to squeeze the three into the frame.
I bet it took you some effort to get the framing just right. Good detail and I love the colours in the galaxies. Is it worth selectively sharpening the dust lane in the vertical galaxy a bit more?
Thanks for that Doug. Yes, I did try deconvolutions and sharpening but couldn't add too much more to the detail in 3628 - we're not talking Starfire or RC here, although the Newt keeps me very happy for the limitations of my imaging budget. I suspect I'm starting to pick up a bit of bias from the Pininsight guys too in that if you can't mathematically select or apply a function you shouldn't just "paint" it in - gets controversial though and I'm certainly not adverse to doing things in PS I can't easily do in PI! I s'pose in the end I strived for processing subtlety as much as possible within the bounds of the data.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement