Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 04-02-2006, 04:22 PM
DRCORTEX (Lance)
Neo - as in Dr Neo Cortex

DRCORTEX is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mt Druitt
Posts: 205
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAJAH235
Lance, What size finder do you have, 8 x 50 or so? To illuminate your X hairs, see attached. HTH... L.
ps. Lesson 1 = Don't skimp on E/Pcs.....
Nice, wish I'd seen that before I bought the "telrad" clone.

Lance
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-02-2006, 04:32 PM
DRCORTEX (Lance)
Neo - as in Dr Neo Cortex

DRCORTEX is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mt Druitt
Posts: 205
Thanks for all advice. My advice to myself now is - see before you buy. I think I'll simply ask my comrades in arms to lend me there Ep's for a few minutes during a session, and satisy myself.


Never know, one I do really like might cost me less than I thought.

Edit: I ended up getting a 2" Synta 42mm WF $49 down from $100 - I shouldn't have any problems with this one. It really is for DSO objects, which my scope seems to handle pretty well. Yeah, yeah, I know, I contradicted myself. I just couldn't help myself, like a kid in a lolly factory. When I have the cash for the scope I really want, the good EP's stay, the other go with my old scope, assumeing I eventually do sell it.

Lance
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-02-2006, 07:20 PM
mickoking's Avatar
mickoking
Vagabond

mickoking is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: China
Posts: 1,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRCORTEX
Thanks for all advice. My advice to myself now is - see before you buy. I think I'll simply ask my comrades in arms to lend me there Ep's for a few minutes during a session, and satisy myself.


Never know, one I do really like might cost me less than I thought.

Edit: I ended up getting a 2" Synta 42mm WF $49 down from $100 - I shouldn't have any problems with this one. It really is for DSO objects, which my scope seems to handle pretty well. Yeah, yeah, I know, I contradicted myself. I just couldn't help myself, like a kid in a lolly factory. When I have the cash for the scope I really want, the good EP's stay, the other go with my old scope, assumeing I eventually do sell it.

Lance
Good onya that's wot its all about.

Clear skies
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-02-2006, 08:07 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRCORTEX
Nice, wish I'd seen that before I bought the "telrad" clone.
Don't worry. Illuminated cross-hairs are no replacement for a telrad, which is a 1x ("naked eye") finder . Nice to have the illuminated finder as well, though. You cover the whole range with: telrad -> finder -> wide TFOV EP -> close-up EP
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-02-2006, 09:18 AM
Argonavis's Avatar
Argonavis (William)
E pur si muove

Argonavis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 745
Quote:
Originally Posted by ausastronomer
The 27mm Panoptic does not suffer from Kidney beaning or blackout, I own 1 as well. The Pentax XW's are exactly the same, they have 20mm of eye relief and you need to use it, if you get too close they blackout as well. Back off that 27mm Panoptic a fraction and you should be fine. CS-John B
John

What is the difference between kidney beaning and blackout?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-02-2006, 11:03 AM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
As I understand it, kidney beaning is (partial) black-outs due to sensitivity of the EP to eye placement perpendicular to the optical axis (e.g., sideways head movements). Plain old black out is due to sensitivity to eye placement along optical axis (eye too close to or too far from lens).
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-02-2006, 12:39 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Steve,

You have hit the nail on the head. However, lots of people use either term to describe both effects including me. Caused by spherical aberration of the exit pupil.

CS-John B
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement