Quote:
Originally Posted by kitsuna
There's something else that springs to mind from that book. It advises that the lowest power you can reasonably achieve for a scope with an obstruction is to multiply the focal ratio by 7mm (the size of a relatively youthful, dark adapted pupil). in my case, I have a f/4.72 so the lowest I could go is 33mm.
Saves me buying superwide pineapple EPs that won't work properly (Televue 41mm Panoptic anyone?) 
|
Yep and that's the very reason I don't go over 30mm eyepieces myself.

And also regarding Naglers, the short eye relief is the very reason I had to stay clear of them.
I own Pentax XW's and they are very highly regarded. 70 deg fov and 20mm eye relief and you can also adjust the height of the eye cup, waterproof too. And so so so comfortable.

I'll be buried with these eyepieces, yep yep.

The 7mm sell here in Aus for $720, but I got mine from the U.S. for only $340 incl. shipping.

Makes no sense to me why here in Aus the 10mm sells for around $500 (compared to the $720 tag of the 7mm), but in the U.S. they are the same price as the 7mm

.
The dollar is very nice at the moment


. For planetary observing in particular, the 10 & 7mm's gives the most amazing contrast and detail and tac sharp right to the edge.
Great review Adam, and am very glad you are enjoying your new "premium" eyepiece. Impossible to look through mediocre or plossl eyepieces after looking through them. The scope can only do so much, good glass does indeed make a difference. Buying good quality, premium eye pieces will probably ending up saving you lots of money anyway as you've gone straight for the best right up.
I will be anxiously waiting for your review of "Backyard Astronomers" book. Come in to the Astronomy Media & Books section and give us some information on it!