Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 15-12-2010, 09:05 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Yes it is the man.
We forget his input but he was one of the greats.
alex
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 15-12-2010, 09:10 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Dam it lost the first round of pool. What was to be a $150 night turned out rather flat. I can not believe I lost I would not have played if I was to lose and wasted so much time there but I lost... still the guy who beat me is so very happy cause I never lose at pool...getting old etc.
alex
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 17-12-2010, 02:48 PM
mws (Michael)
Registered User

mws is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: killcare NSW
Posts: 5
Voids and Time

I wonder how time would move inside one of these great voids, away from gravity.

If time does move faster would it distort the distances that are measured to objects whose light passes through it?

If we accept that that the universe is expanding at an accelerated rate how would time affect the expansion inside one of these voids?

Or is it doctrine that the universe is expanding uniformly at every point?

I need to get some sleep at night so any credible reply would help

Michael
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 17-12-2010, 07:06 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by mws View Post
I wonder how time would move inside one of these great voids, away from gravity.

If time does move faster would it distort the distances that are measured to objects whose light passes through it?

If we accept that that the universe is expanding at an accelerated rate how would time affect the expansion inside one of these voids?

Or is it doctrine that the universe is expanding uniformly at every point?

I need to get some sleep at night so any credible reply would help

Michael
I would imagine space time would be as flat as you would find if there is no matter...although maybe they packed with dark matter.
Short answer is I cant offer a supportable view but I do think these are the sort of questions the voids must present to us.

alex
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 18-12-2010, 08:04 AM
CraigS's Avatar
CraigS
Unpredictable

CraigS is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by mws View Post
I wonder how time would move inside one of these great voids, away from gravity.
Time is relative. Thus, you'd need to rephrase your question from a non-moving observer and a moving traveller's perspective(s).

Quote:
Originally Posted by mws View Post
If time does move faster would it distort the distances that are measured to objects whose light passes through it?
If I understand your starting assumptions correctly, then the answer would be 'no.'
As a matter of fact, if you're asking what would happen if we looked at a distant star through an 'intervening' void then, because there is no dense matter along the line of sight, the light from the star would take a clear, straight path directly through the void and we'd receive a perfectly undistorted image of it. The redshifted light, would be very representative of its distance and also take into account the expansion of the intervening space in the void. (This redshift is not what I'd call 'distortion' of the image).

Quote:
Originally Posted by mws View Post
If we accept that that the universe is expanding at an accelerated rate how would time affect the expansion inside one of these voids?
Time would have no effect on the expansion. The cause of the expansion of space is not yet known. Dark Energy is theorised as its cause.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mws View Post
Or is it doctrine that the universe is expanding uniformly at every point?
Beliefs are not mandatory. There is no 'doctrine'.

The currently supported mainstream Cosmological Model of the Universe includes the expansion of space. Redshifted light observations originally done, (at the largest scales), by Hubble show that the more distant the object, the faster the recession of it, and this applies from any observation point chosen. This leads to Hubble's Law. From this we can derive the age of the most distant visible objects, leading to the age of the observable universe.

All this is based on empirical observation based data. The concept of Redshift results in the expansion model.

Hope this helps.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement