Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 10-12-2010, 08:54 AM
BLiTZWiNG (Trent)
Certified n00b

BLiTZWiNG is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beachmere, QLD
Posts: 277
Jenny I think you might be right there, thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-12-2010, 09:20 AM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
I had a ball last night.
I was shooting through sucker hole half the night, then it cleared completely.
What a joy to see the Milky Way stretching across the sky.
If my pics turn out ok, i'll be posting them later today.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-12-2010, 09:32 AM
supernova1965's Avatar
supernova1965 (Warren)
Buddhist Astronomer

supernova1965 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phillip Island,VIC, Australia
Posts: 4,073
Hi all

I actually saw some stars last night not enough holes to get the scope out as the clouds were moving quick I barely had time for these 30sec exposure's that I took to convince myself in the morning that yes I did see stars last night
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (DSC_5860-1.jpg)
95.2 KB8 views
Click for full-size image (DSC_5861.jpg)
58.9 KB10 views

Last edited by supernova1965; 10-12-2010 at 09:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-12-2010, 10:04 AM
adman (Adam)
Seriously Amateur

adman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,279
cool pictures warren - looks more like an aurora than clouds!

Adam
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-12-2010, 10:13 AM
BLiTZWiNG (Trent)
Certified n00b

BLiTZWiNG is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beachmere, QLD
Posts: 277
Oh haha I just realised that NGC 2070 is the Tarantula nebula. That's the one I thought I was looking at on starry night, but it called it NGC 2070.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-12-2010, 10:15 AM
andrew2008
Registered User

andrew2008 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brisbane. Aus
Posts: 349
I missed the clear night last night to see U2. The tickets were a birthday present for my wife and I wasn't a big fan so would have missed it if not for that. Am I disappointed? Not in the slightest. That was the biggest rock show Brisbane is likely to see for many years to come and I urge anyone having half thoughts of going to Sydney shows to get there. I'd trade several clear nights a year to see a show so spectacular.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-12-2010, 10:15 AM
BLiTZWiNG (Trent)
Certified n00b

BLiTZWiNG is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beachmere, QLD
Posts: 277
I'm wondering if the other one I saw was LH 95.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-12-2010, 10:16 AM
BLiTZWiNG (Trent)
Certified n00b

BLiTZWiNG is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beachmere, QLD
Posts: 277
Oh puhlease. AC/DC was far better.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-12-2010, 10:16 AM
Liz's Avatar
Liz
Registered User

Liz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful SE Tassie
Posts: 4,734
Nice piccies Warren, like the effect - glad you saw some stars at least, you guys have copped it down there - lot more than us.

Glad the concert was great Adam!!

Glad all cleared jjj - always a bonus.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-12-2010, 10:53 AM
jenchris's Avatar
jenchris (Jennifer)
Registered User

jenchris is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ormeau Gold Coast
Posts: 2,067
Tarantula is a good indicator for me, I can see it really well when the seeing is about 7 - almost to the point of it having colour in it.
So I like to look at it
It was the second thing I looked at when I gave my scope first light last year.
Tuc47 was first which is why I photoe'd it first last night -
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (tuc47raw shrunk1500.jpg)
124.0 KB11 views
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 10-12-2010, 12:16 PM
BLiTZWiNG (Trent)
Certified n00b

BLiTZWiNG is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beachmere, QLD
Posts: 277
Hey Jenny that's awesome!

I was noticing that some stars had different colours last night which was nice, but I definitely couldn't see any colour in Tarantula. I'm gonna have to go looking for this Tuc47 too.

If you've noticed that the sky has gone cloudy about now, it's because my RDF arrived

I'd love to do AP but I only have a Sony Cybershot (5 yr old, 5mp camera). Somehow I dont think that will cut it.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-12-2010, 12:45 PM
jenchris's Avatar
jenchris (Jennifer)
Registered User

jenchris is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ormeau Gold Coast
Posts: 2,067
I took some smashing shots of the moon and jupiter with a projection setup - this was an Aldi traveller camera - $100
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (moon sharp.jpg)
173.6 KB6 views
Click for full-size image (BILD0028.jpg)
198.1 KB8 views
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-12-2010, 12:48 PM
supernova1965's Avatar
supernova1965 (Warren)
Buddhist Astronomer

supernova1965 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phillip Island,VIC, Australia
Posts: 4,073
Great shots now all you need to do is explain what you mean by projection setup
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-12-2010, 12:50 PM
BLiTZWiNG (Trent)
Certified n00b

BLiTZWiNG is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beachmere, QLD
Posts: 277
That's quite kewl.

Well regardless, I need attachments and a GOTO of some kind... my current form of manual GOTO wont cut it I dont think.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-12-2010, 01:29 PM
jenchris's Avatar
jenchris (Jennifer)
Registered User

jenchris is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ormeau Gold Coast
Posts: 2,067
These weren't timed exposures - they were literally taken through the eyepiece as a snap (which is a projection picture) - all I did was make up a little piece of wood with a hole in it that fitted over the lenses to hold them lined up and an elastic band to hold it in place - cost - ten minutes of my time to make with a hole saw in a drill.
Set the camera to infinity and snap away, adjusting whatever you can adjust to give you a better shot. The exposures were about 1/30 sec
to 2 seconds (for Saturn which I haven't posted because they're not that good) Increasing the zoom will eliminate vignetting and also diffuse light which may result in over exposure - so if it is too bright and there are no other adjustments, increase the zoom onthe camera !! or fit a filter
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-12-2010, 01:52 PM
supernova1965's Avatar
supernova1965 (Warren)
Buddhist Astronomer

supernova1965 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phillip Island,VIC, Australia
Posts: 4,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by jenchris View Post
These weren't timed exposures - they were literally taken through the eyepiece as a snap (which is a projection picture) - all I did was make up a little piece of wood with a hole in it that fitted over the lenses to hold them lined up and an elastic band to hold it in place - cost - ten minutes of my time to make with a hole saw in a drill.
Set the camera to infinity and snap away, adjusting whatever you can adjust to give you a better shot. The exposures were about 1/30 sec
to 2 seconds (for Saturn which I haven't posted because they're not that good) Increasing the zoom will eliminate vignetting and also diffuse light which may result in over exposure - so if it is too bright and there are no other adjustments, increase the zoom onthe camera !! or fit a filter
Right that's called Afocal held up to the lens. Could you post a pic of your little piece of wood and elastic band rig so I can duplicate it. Sounds ingenius well done.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-12-2010, 02:04 PM
BLiTZWiNG (Trent)
Certified n00b

BLiTZWiNG is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beachmere, QLD
Posts: 277
Wow ok, that from a single snap!

That I would not have imagined! I might get creative now...
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-12-2010, 02:22 PM
jenchris's Avatar
jenchris (Jennifer)
Registered User

jenchris is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ormeau Gold Coast
Posts: 2,067
I've since discarded the piece of wood for a simple piece of vacuum cleaner hose and changed the camera to a samsung - but it's the same principle
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (afocal assembly.jpg)
126.6 KB11 views
Click for full-size image (afocal blowup.jpg)
115.0 KB11 views
Click for full-size image (afocalcomponents.jpg)
117.3 KB11 views
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-12-2010, 02:28 PM
BLiTZWiNG (Trent)
Certified n00b

BLiTZWiNG is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beachmere, QLD
Posts: 277
Gotta love that ingenuity right there.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-12-2010, 02:37 PM
supernova1965's Avatar
supernova1965 (Warren)
Buddhist Astronomer

supernova1965 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phillip Island,VIC, Australia
Posts: 4,073
Very nicely done I will work on one straight away does the camera and eyepiece fit snuggly or do they require some sort of securing to the vacuum hose.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement