Ving i don't even trust myself to browse an astro mag without scope envy, wanting another gadget thingy or wanting to spam on in IIS anyone got a SCT crayford focusser they don't want???
well there you have it....2 hours it took for this thread to reach 20 and go to a second page.
Bird could could have posted the best saturn picture ever and it he would have 3 replys in two hours!!!!
And this thread was about a thread that had nothing in it!!!!!!!
Gee we are a bunch of cards!!!
Mike continues to shake his head!!!
Quite true Dave, but the main item in this is that as a community free flowing with spirit we observed, posted, discussed, posted, knew it was junky anyway and still posted. we are just caring, sharing people Mikes head would have fallen off well and truely before this
Quite true Dave, but the main item in this is that as a community free flowing with spirit we observed, posted, discussed, posted, knew it was junky anyway and still posted. we are just caring, sharing people
OK so what if anything could we do to improve this HOT thread, lets analyse it.
Perhaps take some more dark frames.
Run it through "SPAM IMAGE".
I suppose we could improve the signal to noise ratio by having a voluntary post deletion process.
Wait for clear weather so that all the spammers are out observing.....
OKay I put it down to the sun is still up and we cannot be bothered attaching solar filters to the scope so we have to sit on here and dribble **** until the post counts reaches 1000 on a thread we have no idea what it's about. Oh some of us have to work so those people are excluded
you can't have a topic if it is off topic can you?
But you can have an off topic post on an off topic subject so doesnt that make it on topic on the topic of off topic.
Ahgggg on Ive confused myself now.
anyone got a SCT crayford focusser they don't want??? 
..
