Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 03-09-2010, 03:32 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Yeh probably but also the Champaign Angie had at the awards night made her think more favourably of the idea
AhhHA so champaign bubble equates to hydrogen bubbles capture from space
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-09-2010, 04:41 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,281
I'm a great believer in spending, if you can, so go for it you can't take it with you, all the best on your new purchase and of course you know you will have to live up to our expectations now
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-09-2010, 07:03 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Nice rig. Still drooling.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-09-2010, 07:05 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
Do you have to wait long to take delivery..... When can we expect first light ?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-09-2010, 07:05 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
OK, done some home work, renders some 1.63 arc/secs, nice, about the same as the tiny refractor thing you have with the 16k chip. BUT its also the same FL .

Now, given WW is rubbish, thats a given, what do you get?. Faster rubbish (or deeper rubbish for the same exposure I guess) . Faster rubbish is good, reduces the pain of capturing rubbish, you know, the embarisment of bothering with rubbish at all .

Looking forward to even more WW rubbish Mike. Deeper, hi res rubbish .

I do appreciate how well you do WW rubbish though Mike, your good at it, one day you will cross to the dark side and convert to the real faith .

In the mean time though, youve purchased well I think, good luck .
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-09-2010, 07:07 PM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
Nice looking scope, all the best with it. I saw the ad in one of the online shops dont recall which one, and thought wow nice but there was no price. Should have know it would be expensive.

Did you consider the Ricardi Honders, I have read they are just about done with the first batch at AP.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-09-2010, 07:07 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
OK, done some home work, renders some 1.63 arc/secs, nice, about the same as the tiny refractor thing you have with the 16k chip. BUT its also the same FL .

Now, given WW is rubbish, thats a given, what do you get?. Faster rubbish (or deeper rubbish for the same exposure I guess) . Faster rubbish is good, reduces the pain of capturing rubbish, you know, the embarisment of bothering with rubbish at all .

Looking forward to even more WW rubbish Mike. Deeper, hi res rubbish .

I do appreciate how well you do WW rubbish though Mike, your good at it, one day you will cross to the dark side and convert to the real faith .

In the mean time though, youve purchased well I think, good luck .
That was a lot of rubbish in one post.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-09-2010, 07:15 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,475
Nice one. So did you go for Zerodur? Have to say I'm looking at something similar

So many toys...so little time...
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-09-2010, 07:21 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
OK, done some home work, renders some 1.63 arc/secs, nice, about the same as the tiny refractor thing you have with the 16k chip. BUT its also the same FL .

Now, given WW is rubbish, thats a given, what do you get?. Faster rubbish (or deeper rubbish for the same exposure I guess) . Faster rubbish is good, reduces the pain of capturing rubbish, you know, the embarisment of bothering with rubbish at all .

Looking forward to even more WW rubbish Mike. Deeper, hi res rubbish .

I do appreciate how well you do WW rubbish though Mike, your good at it, one day you will cross to the dark side and convert to the real faith .

In the mean time though, youve purchased well I think, good luck .
You got it all in one Fredo

The AP is 1300mm FL actually (4" FF extends the FL a little) so = 1.43"/pixel = aaaalmost NF

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-09-2010, 08:59 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Nice one. So did you go for Zerodur? Have to say I'm looking at something similar

So many toys...so little time...
Hadn't considered the Zerodur upgrade, would be nice.. maybe I ask?

Yes looked at the RH but it was out of my price range as I suspect the AP version will be too ...not to mention the usual AP waiting list

A fast corrected Newt is harder to pull off than most would think and must be made very well in order to work well, so I can only hope....

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 04-09-2010, 11:06 AM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
Mate, given how much I enjoy looking at the gems of the night sky you produce, I hope you get delivered a fine scope!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-09-2010, 12:02 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal View Post
Mate, given how much I enjoy looking at the gems of the night sky you produce, I hope you get delivered a fine scope!
Hi Karl, as a fellow AP APO owner we are very spoiled, any replacement scope has a lot to live up to. I am more than a little nervous I must say but I couldn't grow old wondering if I should have given this platform one more go, I am conviced it is the perfect compromise of astroimaging (on a realistic budget) ie decent apperture, photographically fast with reasonable image scale and a large well corrected and illuminated FOV

That's the hope and I can do no more....now just to wait and see . I am the guinea pig again and if it proves effective this time, well, you can all go out and buy one happy that it will most likely work, if not.... they are dead in the water.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 05-09-2010, 06:59 AM
Tom Davis's Avatar
Tom Davis (Tom)
Registered User

Tom Davis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Inkom, ID USA
Posts: 589
I'm sure it will be excellent, Mike. You will take some killer images for sure!

BTW, I will be getting a new scope as well. I expect my new AP 305 f/3.8 Honders next week. I'm pretty excited to see what it will do.

-Tom
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-09-2010, 10:37 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Quote:
I'm sure it will be excellent, Mike. You will take some killer images for sure!
After the ASA debarcle I will respectfully reserve my verdict

Quote:
BTW, I will be getting a new scope as well. I expect my new AP 305 f/3.8 Honders next week. I'm pretty excited to see what it will do.
....DOH! God dam it, you lucky so and so
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-09-2010, 10:50 AM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Exciting times ahead Mike for sure. We'll all look forward to sharing the journey. Get that sucker locked in place well before the memory of the champagne dies off!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 05-09-2010, 11:44 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Davis View Post
I'm sure it will be excellent, Mike. You will take some killer images for sure!

BTW, I will be getting a new scope as well. I expect my new AP 305 f/3.8 Honders next week. I'm pretty excited to see what it will do.

-Tom
Well done Tom! I'm on "this list" but AP have given no indication on when/if I might get mine.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 05-09-2010, 11:57 AM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
I wish I could get some "rubbish" like that !
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 05-09-2010, 03:04 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Nice one. So did you go for Zerodur? Have to say I'm looking at something similar

So many toys...so little time...
Hard to pick between the Cerevolo and the AP Honders? Similar pricing and quality. The Cerevolo has two configurations but I imagine different configurations are/will be avilable for the AP Honders too? In the end it comes down to what focal lengths/ratio you want (but they are even close in this department too) or if you want diffraction spikes or not? Sadly for me both were much more expensive than the Orion AG12 though.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 05-09-2010, 05:19 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Hard to pick between the Cerevolo and the AP Honders? ....
'aint that the truth

There is a Ceravolo in my garage at present. Very spiffy.
(sadly not mine..it goes to its owner shortly).

However when configured to something "workable" they are $US 8k more than the AP (!!) then again you end up with a two for one deal F4.9 and F9.

Despite the AP being a one trick pony, it is a full f stop faster...and I suspect a slightly more "elegant" design.....anyway hope to find out next week what the status quo is.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-09-2010, 09:31 AM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
The new tak trifocal Cassegrain cca-250 is another contenter in this range. With 3 FL' ragning from f/3.59 to f/8 this would be nice all in one scope. But I think this is more pricer than the Orion once you add all the accesories.

http://www.buytelescopes.com/Product...strograph.aspx
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement