Precision Cosmology Defeats void Model

[renormalised (Carl)]

Originally Posted by CraigS

The term 'Precision' was what drew my attention to the paper in the first place (because of the 'oxy-moron-ness'). And I found it's content highly worthwhile.
Perhaps 'Precision' is a new marketing term in Cosmology !



Cheers

Don't go giving them any ideas!!!!

Next minute, the journals will be flooding with "precision" articles!!!!

Like...

"Precision Measurements of Doppler Drift upon Cosmological Redshifts at 2<z<4"

"Precision Cosmological Models for Anomalous Flow in the Direction of...."

blah blah

[CraigS]

Originally Posted by renormalised

Don't go giving them any ideas!!!!

Next minute, the journals will be flooding with "precision" articles!!!!

Like...

"Precision Measurements of Doppler Drift upon Cosmological Redshifts at 2<z<4"

"Precision Cosmological Models for Anomalous Flow in the Direction of...."

blah blah

Oh but we've only just started ...

"The Precise Cosmological Forces of Canine Driven Terra Forming";
"The Precise Dimensions of Gravity Attributable to Cosmological Bacteriological Enzymes".

Disgraceful sending up my own post !! Especially when I've spent the day on my next 'project' ...
"The Precise Cosmological Applications of Gravitation Lensing"
It should be a beauty for this audience !!


Cheers

[Jarvamundo (Alex)]

Originally Posted by higginsdj

I have to chuckle somewhat when I see title's like 'Precision Cosmology'. That sounds like an oxymoron to me given that the field is based solely on theory built on top of other theory and almost no observational evidence.....

+1

It's as if they wave their opened palm across your face, and a jedi mind trick...

"precision cosmology"

I agree funny as all!

Kinda also works with "dark energy" "dark matter" "quark star" "worm holes"

Originally Posted by higginsdj

I didn't say there was none - just not much and what there is points to something which then can only be theorised. ie theory based on theory based on theory. Thats not a very solid foundation for a field of science!

more gold

+1

great comments, good questions.

[CraigS]

Originally Posted by Jarvamundo

great comments, good questions.

Pretty judgemental !!

[Jarvamundo (Alex)]

Originally Posted by CraigS

Pretty judgemental !!

precisely?

[CraigS]

Originally Posted by Jarvamundo

precisely?

A marketing term !!

[Jarvamundo (Alex)]

Originally Posted by CraigS

A marketing term !!

sold, take my money

[CraigS]

Originally Posted by Jarvamundo

sold, take my money

Nah .. I've already got some !