Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 30-12-2005, 09:18 PM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Bert, I'll take your word for the fov calculation, I'm not sure how to calculate that - but the other details on focal length and camera are correct.

Resolution is a tricky thing to get accurate - I still feel that there is a lot more potential information present in the raw frames than the current software can extract. More so in these images because there was a lot of thermal motion going on, and it's only partly corrected for in software.

I could be optimistic and claim a couple of hundred metres per pixel, it should be something like that.

regards, Bird
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 30-12-2005, 09:59 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
If the numbers are correct then the FOV is correct.

FOV in deg =57.3(width of sensor/focal length) .
One radian =57.3deg.
as long as all dimensions are the same units.

and Moon diameter 3476 km
assume 0.5 deg apparent angular size

so (0.024/0.5)X3476 = 167 km for 680 pixels

so 167/640 = 0.260 km per pixel

So each pixel is 260M
If we assume the niquist theory is correct that you have to sample at half the distance of the wanted resolution then your best theoretical resolution is about 500m. I think that is amazing.



Bert

Last edited by avandonk; 30-12-2005 at 10:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement