Bert, I'll take your word for the fov calculation, I'm not sure how to calculate that - but the other details on focal length and camera are correct.
Resolution is a tricky thing to get accurate - I still feel that there is a lot more potential information present in the raw frames than the current software can extract. More so in these images because there was a lot of thermal motion going on, and it's only partly corrected for in software.
I could be optimistic and claim a couple of hundred metres per pixel, it should be something like that.
regards, Bird
|