Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 23-04-2010, 03:09 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
Japanese scientists threw boomerangs while at the ISS.
Is this good enough?

Regards

Steven
That's way too dangerous!!!. I'd rather get hit in the head by a "ball of feathers" than a lump of wood or hard plastic!!!. A bird won't do the same sort of damage a boomerang can
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 23-04-2010, 03:25 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
Japanese scientists threw boomerangs while at the ISS.
Is this good enough?

Regards

Steven
That would explain the sudden radio blackout they had last week...did it come back?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 23-04-2010, 05:13 PM
Nesti (Mark)
Registered User

Nesti is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
The question is whether birds and insects can fly in parabolic pathways in a zero g environment. My gut feeling is no. The descent requires the bird or insect to perform work instead of gravity to land.
If this is not possible the simplified pathway is an angled straight line, a one way trip to oblivion or a really bad headache.

Regards

Steven

No Steven, the question was actually this, "What would the dynamics of a bird in flight be like if there was air, but no gravity? How would the aerodynamics of lift, drag and propulsion change for a feathered bird?"

What I've been trying to describe, is what type of flight dynamics would be needed for flight in a zero G environment, then asking what type of bird might have the best chance of doing it. I have not entered into whether a bird is taking-off or landing as yet because I feel we must determine if normal flight is even possible first (the basics); before tackling more complex issues.

I agree with you that it would more than likely be impossible for birds to do so however, if there was a species that could do it, what species would it be. But first of all we must know what type of dynamics is required for basic straight and level first, then turns, and then we can bring our attention to ascent and descent (two meaningless words in zero G BTW).

You wrote, "The flight paths of birds and insects are not horizontal straight lines". I agree, lift must balance the field of acceleration, that's why stated that a symmetrical aerofoil would be needed as a cambered wing would generate lift unnecessarily as gravitation is not a factor. A symmetrical aerofoil would only come into play when a turn is initiated (angle of attack to generate lift).

The subject of landing and take-off is a different issue to sustained flight and wasn't the original question however, I responded by saying that landing on the ground - the floor - would be no different than landing into a wall, in that there is no up or down. That would also apply to landing on the ceiling.

For an aircraft, straight and level flight is indeed possible in zero G and best achieved by using a symmetrical aerofoil (no lift generated), good control surface area, minimal wing tip/tail mass, the ability to apply aileron force against engine torque (prop). Every control throw would require an equal and opposite throw to counteract the input. If you want an example, look no further than an aircraft in a parabolic free-fall which simulates a zero G environment..it's simply pitching the nose over at the same rate as the field of acceleration. Can a bird fly a parabolic free-fall trajectory with it's wings open, you bet, Hawks do it all the time.

Now is it possible for a bird to make directional changes while in a parabolic free-fall? Of course.

Can a bird take-off in zero G. Yes. If it's holding onto something, beats it's wings and lets go, that's a take-off...and it can do this in any direction as all directions are the same.

Can a bird land in zero G. No, it can only collide, whether it be the floor, wall or ceiling.

The single biggest issue would be that a bird would not be able to understand what is going on, so it would assume that the mysterious force of gravity was ever-present and make mistakes...but can it learn to compensate?!

Last edited by Nesti; 23-04-2010 at 05:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 23-04-2010, 05:53 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nesti View Post
if there was a species that could do it, what species would it be
Fish, dolphins...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 27-04-2010, 01:57 AM
JD2439975's Avatar
JD2439975 (Justin)
Cloud hater

JD2439975 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Conondale QLD
Posts: 493
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Not sure about the birds but there sure would be a lot less s**t in my backyard.
Classic, love it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement