Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 10-11-2005, 04:35 PM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Spent all of Feb in tassie last year, also went there on our honeymoon in '92. A good friend of mine from school lives down that way in Burnie.

Bird
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-11-2005, 05:27 PM
rumples riot
Who knows

rumples riot is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackwood South Australia
Posts: 3,051
Gary, I have noticed little or no difference in collimation from the horizontal to the imagined object with regard to collimation. This I suppose is particular to SCT's which are less susceptible to issues relating to flexure of the tube. The shorter tube has its benefits in this regard. That said collimation should not be undertaken when the scope is in direct sunlight. The tube currents will destroy the likelyhood of getting good collimation with the day star.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-11-2005, 06:14 PM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Good info Paul, I know almost nothing about SCT's so it's good to hear from people that own them..

Bird
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 17-11-2005, 04:41 PM
robin's Avatar
robin
Brave Sir Robin

robin is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Warrnambool,Victoria
Posts: 489
Great stuff Bird. The issue Im facing is focussing.Finding it difficult to get a real nice focus thing going but i guess at the end of the day, the seeing will determine much of that.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 24-11-2005, 06:06 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Hi bird.

Very nice article. "get to know your equipment" is one rule I try to live by. I'm a compulsive star test collimator & I will check collimation {& tweak if necessary} on every new object I look at. {this includes my refractor} If I'm looking at a planet I will goto the nearest star, check collimation & move back to the planet. One gadget I've found invaluable in star test collimation in ordinary-bad seeing conditions is an aperture mask {not to be confused with a hartmann} a 1 holed aperture mask, the hole being round.

I can't explain scientifically but it seems to add more contrast to the diffraction rings seen & hence their a lot easier to see. You have less time to workout which screw to turn....which way to turn....turn, then get back to the eyepiece & start over though, which COULD lead to the 'kicking the crap outa the OTA' scenerio if one's not very patient.

Well done & great to read your thoughts on a few issues.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 24-11-2005, 08:16 AM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Hi Asi, an aperture mask is a good thing to have as you say. Thats one area where smaller scopes have an advantage, they perform better in bad seeing and also the diffration rings around stars are easier to see for collimation.

Bird
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement