Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 20-10-2009, 09:11 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
He's all over it like a fat kid on a cup cake !

Waiting for an image ! I getting excited........
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 20-10-2009, 09:22 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
I won't be guiding tonight. I'd have to sticky tape my QHY5 to the finder. But I'll post some pics soon. I just finished processing quickly the M8 widefield. 20x30s so 10min all up. You're not gonna believe it when you see it. Problem now for me is going to be that the data is coming in faster than I can process it.

Here it is: 20x30s unguided. The HS is not collimated and focus is eyeballed. So you can see the potential
Holy crap Batman! Dang that is good. Someones doing a happy dance I suspect (until they see all the data they have to process )

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 20-10-2009, 09:25 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpastern View Post
Holy crap Batman! Dang that is good. Someones doing a happy dance I suspect (until they see all the data they have to process )

Dave
While processing that I did 50 subs on M16. It looks sick. This is commando imaging. In and out. Clouds don't even get a chance to creep in.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 20-10-2009, 09:31 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Sometimes you just wish you could swear on these forums.....

FFFFAAAARRRR OUUUT!!

man, 50x20sec on M16 is going to be insane!!

Judging by that M8 I guess that the guy in USA was right when he said you could get more images in one night than you would normally get in a month....

To be very honest with you... Right now, I am the Ha in a hubble pallet image.. Yep... GREEEEENNNNN!!!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 20-10-2009, 09:35 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Sometimes you just wish you could swear on these forums.....

FFFFAAAARRRR OUUUT!!

man, 50x20sec on M16 is going to be insane!!

Judging by that M8 I guess that the guy in USA was right when he said you could get more images in one night than you would normally get in a month....

To be very honest with you... Right now, I am the Ha in a hubble pallet image.. Yep... GREEEEENNNNN!!!
Well I believe it now. The mount is stuck in sidereal rate and I move the C11 manually by hand, then set neb to do 40 subs of 30s, come back move it somewhere else and do it again. You could very easily do tricolor NB in one night. Focusing is also no as hard as I feared and the camera hasn't fogged up yet. Touch wood. Maybe beginners luck?

Another thing is that losing subs doesn't matter anymore. I bumped the mount and had 2 subs jagged on M16. I shot another 5
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 20-10-2009, 09:48 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Have you hit the helix yet just for comparison purposes?

Just for an update, how many targets have you hit, and how long have you been imaging for? These are going to be the questions that make 90% of people wanting a hyperstar converted SCT once answered I think..
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 20-10-2009, 09:50 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
What would happen if a Melincam was put on a Hyperstar?The mind boggles.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 20-10-2009, 09:53 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Have you hit the helix yet just for comparison purposes?

Just for an update, how many targets have you hit, and how long have you been imaging for? These are going to be the questions that make 90% of people wanting a hyperstar converted SCT once answered I think..
No I haven't. I can't see it . I'll try if I can point to it. I'm definitely waiting for the HH and orion. I might chuck a quick mosaic of the whole area in Ha?

I have 30 subs on M8 and 40 subs on M16. But I have left the scope not imaging at all as well because I have spent all my evening at the PC processing. I'm not even outside. But I reckon if you spend one night at the scope imaging the amount of data you would get could be quite overwhelming. It's information overload. It's only 10:00pm now and I feel like I have been imaging for one whole week-end when I look at what I've captured so far. I think this system is ideal out in the field. You can setup quickly and shoot a lot of subs then sort them later. Ideal to do mosaic I'd say. Even in narrowband. Because the acquisition time is so fast. It's reversed. You don't wait for your subs anymore . They keep coming in.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 20-10-2009, 10:00 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
imagine if you had a 1tb hard drive, running 1min subs all night on a target.. This would be exceptionally adventagous with an equatorial fork mounted scope that could track straight through the meridian.. You could easily get 5~6 hrs of 1min subs... It would take a day for DSS to stack it all up, but the resulting image would be extreme... Megadata to the max!!

I think the big test will be 30~40sec subs of the horse head area... do as many as you can stay awake to do mate.... I really want to see what you can do with this on night one... from the M8 image and what you've said about the M16 shot, I can see this will turn you into one of the most productive imagers around.. a 2 night star party will result in 2 months worth of processing work!! hahaha

Time to buy a few big arse external hard drives!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 20-10-2009, 10:04 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
imagine if you had a 1tb hard drive, running 1min subs all night on a target.. This would be exceptionally adventagous with an equatorial fork mounted scope that could track straight through the meridian.. You could easily get 5~6 hrs of 1min subs... It would take a day for DSS to stack it all up, but the resulting image would be extreme... Megadata to the max!!

I think the big test will be 30~40sec subs of the horse head area... do as many as you can stay awake to do mate.... I really want to see what you can do with this on night one... from the M8 image and what you've said about the M16 shot, I can see this will turn you into one of the most productive imagers around.. a 2 night star party will result in 2 months worth of processing work!! hahaha

Time to buy a few big arse external hard drives!
I don't know. I pulled an all nighter last night but I wanna wait for Orion. Problem is that it clears my roof line quite late in the morning but I might get some subs in (60 or something like that ) . Mate, I'm telling you, you HAVE TO get one of those. They're wicked. Looking at the data in the 30s subs it looks like 10min subs from my 5" newt. And the resolution is better because of the massive aperture.

When I'll guide I'll try one deep 20min Ha Sub somewhere see what comes up. That should be interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 20-10-2009, 10:08 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
You're a Baaaaad man Marc... Im going to be broke as hell, and its going to be your fault....

Wanted : C8 or C9.25...

Drool...

On a scale of 1 to 10, rate the value of your new investment...
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 20-10-2009, 10:14 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexn View Post
you're a baaaaad man marc... Im going to be broke as hell, and its going to be your fault....

Wanted : C8 or c9.25...

Drool...

On a scale of 1 to 10, rate the value of your new investment... :p
11 - Just checked the Helix. Found it. Did 40 subs on it. I can see the outer arch nebulosity in a single 30s shot.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 20-10-2009, 10:24 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Oh I'd say 12.5.... outer arch in 30s = 12.5 on the 1 to 10 awesometer..
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 20-10-2009, 10:33 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Oh I'd say 12.5.... outer arch in 30s = 12.5 on the 1 to 10 awesometer..
When I received the Hyperstar box there was a note in it hand written from Dean at Starizona "Thanks - enjoy! ... sleep while you can..."
So you're sold yet? Will post M16 shortly.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 20-10-2009, 10:37 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Dude, I was sold half an hour ago when you posted that 10min shot of M8...

I've since been scouring the forums and other online sources for a used SCT... I'd even consider buying a full setup on forks with a wedge, have hyperstar running Ha lum images while the TMB pulls down colour data.. the focal length of the two setups would be similar, and the results could be outstanding.. Although I'd need to ditch this Orion SS Pro.. Its 5 or 6 inches in diameter.. That would effectively kill the idea... Although a nice little SX H9C or even better, the M25C could be the go... But yes... Im running numbers and sourcing what I'd need as I type this... Like I said.. You are a baaaaad man Marc...

I love it.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 20-10-2009, 10:54 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Marc, you're a bad bad man. Really. Bad. You've corruped Alex and he's turning to the dark side of the image. and you're trying to corrupt me as well it seems. I will resist, I will be strong (prolly until I see the images, and then I'll break down and weep). waaa!

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 20-10-2009, 11:06 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Here's M16 40x30s. Was a bit low on the horizon across the M7. All those shots are uncalibrated and unguided so it's just quick and dirty. Just want to show the photon gathering capability of the hyperstar system. Even through a dense filter such as Ha. 30s subs? C'mon!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (HS_M16.jpg)
195.2 KB63 views
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 20-10-2009, 11:16 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
I'll say this Marc...

I use 30sec subs through a 7nm Ha filter to frame the image... I dont see nebulosity, but I can just make out the star cluster to the top left of the pillars... I run 20min subs to get nebula extension that you've captured there.. my scope is 80mm F/6... So clearly, 80mm F/6 gathers less light than 280mm F/2 hahah!

Ps - M16 looks Sahweeeettt!!

Stomach.... Turning.... Soooooooo..... Jealous....
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 20-10-2009, 11:19 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
I'll say this Marc...

I use 30sec subs through a 7nm Ha filter to frame the image... I dont see nebulosity, but I can just make out the star cluster to the top left of the pillars... I run 20min subs to get nebula extension that you've captured there.. my scope is 80mm F/6... So clearly, 80mm F/6 gathers less light than 280mm F/2 hahah!
I shouldn't say that but to frame the Helix I was in frame focus mode on 5s exp in Neb2 and I could make up the full ring.

You know what. I think I'll call it a night. Too any subs now. I have 80subs on the helix coz I kept shooting while processing M16. That was a good test though. Really happy with it. Another thing is the fan of the QHY8 with the heat extractor kept the dew off the corrector plate. Dry as a whistle inside the dew shield.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 20-10-2009, 11:22 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
**Alex can not type right now... He's too busy sulking in the corner of a darkened room...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement