ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waxing Crescent 29.1%
|
|

05-08-2009, 11:19 AM
|
 |
This sentence is false
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,158
|
|
Really nice Andew. Why did you use 2 cameras?
|

05-08-2009, 12:03 PM
|
 |
Rickapoodyandafandoogally
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mardi NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,123
|
|
The red color in that I haven't seen before RB.
Looks very eery and makes it look so deep. Sort of like a redback spider's nest. 
Great effort mate as usual.
|

05-08-2009, 07:31 PM
|
 |
Tech Guru
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,892
|
|
Impressive - why use two Canon's - espeically if you have the 20Da?
|

05-08-2009, 07:49 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,587
|
|
Thanks for all your lovely comments everyone.
Glad you liked the image.
I've always wanted to image the Tarantula, this was my first serious attempt at it.
I've always thought it to be a very 'busy' region and as Fred said, it's hard to make this area not look messy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
How cool is this?  How did you manage to stretch the colors like that between the reds and the blues?
|
Marc thanks, this is one reason I used 2 cameras, the 20Da having the better response and the 20D to gain back some of the blue hues.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moon
Really nice Andew. Why did you use 2 cameras?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by g__day
Impressive - why use two Canon's - espeically if you have the 20Da?
|
Thanks for your comments guys, the other reason I used two cameras was that I was able to expose through one DSLR while taking darks with the other then swapping their roles and continue to expose.
A lot of work but worth it in the end.
|

05-08-2009, 08:13 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,182
|
|
Thanks for your comments guys, the other reason I used two cameras was that I was able to expose through one DSLR while taking darks with the other then swapping their roles and continue to expose
 [/QUOTE]
Hi Andrew,
2 chips won't have the same noise pattern so this may not be working too well. The dark noise will only be the same for the same chip and will be different for the 2nd chip. Have a look at the darks from each camera and you should see they are not the same.
Greg.
|

05-08-2009, 08:26 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,587
|
|
Yes I agree Greg they are not the same, I processed each camera's group separately and then blended the two sets.
|

06-08-2009, 10:18 AM
|
 |
Tech Guru
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,892
|
|
Andrew,
Just a thought - that is such a stunning shot - especially as its done on a DSLR - why not expand this shot into an article on DSLR processing.
The first shot I took of this target was one of my first guided shots on a DSLR. I was pretty happy with it back then until Peter Ward asked why is it green? I naively asked - oh what colour was it supposed to be? And this openned a whole new door of image processing skills.
Given the Tarantula is such a common target for folk after they have started their entry into guided astro photography - why now explain a bit more for us the steps involved - it would make a great tutorial! The subtle detail in your shot is fantastic.
PS
Could you please post one of your shots unprocessed so we could see the colours comming out of your DSLR.
I remember Jase commenting on my first shot - check your calibration frames (and me asking what's a calibration frame  )
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=24515
So I guess my shot was atypically of someone first targeting the Tarantula and yours of great gear in a masters hands.
|

06-08-2009, 10:27 AM
|
 |
ze frogginator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,078
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RB
Yes I agree Greg they are not the same, I processed each camera's group separately and then blended the two sets.

|
That is a very interesting technique. Definitely thinking out of the box and the result is great.
|

06-08-2009, 11:03 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,182
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RB
Yes I agree Greg they are not the same, I processed each camera's group separately and then blended the two sets.

|
Oh I see.
Don't you have a darks library or do you take your darks on the night? I take it if you do that its because you want to match the
temperature as close as possible?
But then Images Plus and CCDstack have adaptive darks where the software will adjust your stock dark with the image if it is
a different temp or different exposure length. It works really well. I can't see any difference between them and exact exposure/temp
dark subtractions (but then I have my eyes closed when I look at the results hahaha) no really I can't see any difference. Makes for a
lot of convenience and more imaging time.
Once again fabulous image.
Greg.
Last edited by gregbradley; 06-08-2009 at 05:28 PM.
|

06-08-2009, 12:22 PM
|
 |
“We are star-stuff”
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 1,317
|
|
Very Cool RB!!
Really like the processing, a nice departure from the typical "over red" examples.
Cheers
Deeno
PS Good to see you catching some photons
|

07-08-2009, 03:23 PM
|
PI cult member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
|
|
Another lovely image from IIS! Well done Andrew - that's a fantastic result no matter what camera you used imho. It shows that you can get great images no matter what, as long as you do a good job getting the data of course.
Dave
|

09-08-2009, 09:04 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,587
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by g__day
Andrew,
Just a thought - that is such a stunning shot - especially as its done on a DSLR - why not expand this shot into an article on DSLR processing.
.
Given the Tarantula is such a common target for folk after they have started their entry into guided astro photography - why now explain a bit more for us the steps involved - it would make a great tutorial! The subtle detail in your shot is fantastic.
.
|
Matthew thank you for your kind words, when I get a bit of time I'll put a small article together explaining what steps I took.
Cheers
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
That is a very interesting technique. Definitely thinking out of the box and the result is great.
|
Many thanks Marc !
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
Oh I see.
Don't you have a darks library or do you take your darks on the night? I take it if you do that its because you want to match the
temperature as close as possible?
But then Images Plus and CCDstack have adaptive darks where the software will adjust your stock dark with the image if it is
a different temp or different exposure length. It works really well. I can't see any difference between them and exact exposure/temp
dark subtractions (but then I have my eyes closed when I look at the results hahaha) no really I can't see any difference. Makes for a
lot of convenience and more imaging time.
Once again fabulous image.
Greg.
|
Thanks for the info Greg, I seldom use IP now and I've never tried using a 'darks' library, I'll have to give it a go since it surly will make things a lot easier and allow more time to gather 'light' frames.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deeno
Very Cool RB!!
Really like the processing, a nice departure from the typical "over red" examples.
Cheers
Deeno
PS Good to see you catching some photons
|
Cheers Deeno, yes it sure is nice to get out under the stars and do some imaging for a change, even though I had to fight high altitude clouds at times.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpastern
Another lovely image from IIS! Well done Andrew - that's a fantastic result no matter what camera you used imho. It shows that you can get great images no matter what, as long as you do a good job getting the data of course.
Dave
|
Dave, thank you so much for your kind comments, glad you enjoyed the image.
I'm hoping to get out and do some more soon.
|

09-08-2009, 09:42 PM
|
 |
Fast Scope & Fast Engine
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Broken Hill N.S.W
Posts: 3,305
|
|
Outstanding work Andrew, Tis a credit to you.
Cheers Kev.
|

09-08-2009, 11:24 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
|
|
 Top work RB, another class image
|

10-08-2009, 08:21 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
|
|
Outstanding image Andrew, I like all aspects of your image.
All the best for more.
|

10-08-2009, 06:45 PM
|
Quietly watching
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
|
|
an intriging image, look forward to your write up of the processing.
|

11-08-2009, 10:58 AM
|
 |
1¼" ñì®våñá
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
|
|
I've been spending too much time in the planetary images section, and missed this great image!
Great shot Andrew, I really like the impression it leaves with the colour balance you have processed - it certainly is a high impact image!
|

11-08-2009, 12:08 PM
|
 |
Support your local RFS
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
|
|
Cracking image RB, you have captured some wonderful depth in this image.
Cheers
|

11-08-2009, 04:28 PM
|
 |
Member > 10year club
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Coast NSW
Posts: 3,339
|
|
Belated
Sorry RB, I missed this earlier too!
I know nothing about astrophotography Andrew, so I look forward to your book. Can I reserve a copy now!
Despite the above, I feel compelled to say,
Simply Breath-taking, my friend.
Do you bring this gear to the PC?
I am interested to learn more.
Thanks for posting it.
|

12-08-2009, 08:01 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,587
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevnool
Outstanding work Andrew, Tis a credit to you.
Cheers Kev.
|
Kev thank you so much mate, glad you enjoyed it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by beren
 Top work RB, another class image
|
Stuart cheers, I was very happy with the result.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lester
Outstanding image Andrew, I like all aspects of your image.
All the best for more.
|
Many thanks Lester, may we all have clear skies to enjoy our wonderful hobby, all the best my friend.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy
an intriging image, look forward to your write up of the processing.
|
Clive, cheers mate and thanks for having a look.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal
I've been spending too much time in the planetary images section, and missed this great image!
Great shot Andrew, I really like the impression it leaves with the colour balance you have processed - it certainly is a high impact image!
|
Glad you stopped by Andrew, yes I loved the colour results too, it's exactly how I was hoping it would turn out like.
Clear skies !
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric
Cracking image RB, you have captured some wonderful depth in this image.
Cheers
|
Ricky !!
Thanks mate, glad you liked it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allan_L
Sorry RB, I missed this earlier too!
I know nothing about astrophotography Andrew, so I look forward to your book. Can I reserve a copy now!
Despite the above, I feel compelled to say,
Simply Breath-taking, my friend.
Do you bring this gear to the PC?
I am interested to learn more.
Thanks for posting it.
|
Thank you so much for your comments too Allan !!
Contrary to popular belief, yes I do sometimes bring the gear to the pony club, although few have ever seen it.
Next time we meet I'll spend some time with you and we'll talk.
Once again thank you to all who replied and all who viewed and enjoyed.
Best Regards
Andrew
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:46 AM.
|
|