Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 07-07-2009, 10:15 PM
MrB's Avatar
MrB (Simon)
Old Man Yells at Cloud

MrB is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rockingham WA
Posts: 3,435
Ahhhh, hadn't considered filters.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-07-2009, 10:25 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjjnettie View Post
It's a top shot for sure Mike. Even more amazing when you think about how many light years those photons have travelled just to hit your ccd sensor.

This post has me reminiscing. Remember the comparison photos that Irwin once posted, one of his Mars images and a Hubble one? Extraordinary. Makes one wonder what he would be producing with today's technology.
(sorry to hijack this thread btw)

Get well soon Mike.
Hi Jeanette

I assume you mean Erwin van der Velden?

No I didn't see them, where is Irwins image, love to see it if it is still on the net.

No Hijack here

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-07-2009, 05:32 AM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
i could be a swine and be critical, maybee squeal a little bit, make up a curly tale, ..... but no .... i canna do that to a sick man



get well soon big guy.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-07-2009, 10:17 AM
loc46south (Geoffrey)
loc46south

loc46south is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Milton - New Zealand
Posts: 176
Great Detail and clarity - Deserved to be a Winner.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-07-2009, 01:05 PM
Tom Davis's Avatar
Tom Davis (Tom)
Registered User

Tom Davis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Inkom, ID USA
Posts: 589
Sweet comparison! Sorry about the flu -- you haven't been kissing any pigs lately have you

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-07-2009, 08:35 PM
scopemankit's Avatar
scopemankit (Chris)
just build it!

scopemankit is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cape Town - South Africa
Posts: 356
Mike, I distorted the pic a bit to de-ovalise a couple of stars. The main experiment was to change the colours on your (middle ) image.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-07-2009, 10:10 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by scopemankit View Post
Mike, I distorted the pic a bit to de-ovalise a couple of stars. The main experiment was to change the colours on your (middle ) image.
Oh ok. Gee I thought it was a a totally different image...you murdered it man

I did this imge back in May 06, at that stage I was imaging with a Starlightxpress camera and True Tech filterwheel. Unfortunately the internal filter wheel disc was not orthoganal to the optical axis and it sloped a bit which sometimes caused oval stars, in this case I had a bit of tilt in my Ha shots which was why I added the Lum and Red to the Ha, this helped reduce the ovalisation but did lose a bit of resolution because the Lum and Red data isn't as detailed, still, I was happy with the final outcome.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-07-2009, 11:17 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
What a fantastic comparison! Thanks for that great image Mike. You are right, it does make you notice things you would otherwise miss...

Baz.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-07-2009, 12:22 AM
Screwdriverone's Avatar
Screwdriverone (Chris)
I have detailed files....

Screwdriverone is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kellyville Ridge, NSW Australia
Posts: 3,306
A few facts to consider here;

Image on the Left Image on the Right

Author: Mike Sidonio (Aus) Hubble/Nasa/ESA....US etc

People involved: 1 >5000

Aperture used: 150mm & 80mm 2400mm

Weight: <100kg (scope, not u) 11,170kg (11 tonnes)

Speed: 0 km/h 27,000 km/h

Technology: Refractor & CCD RC Cassegrain & WFC

Altitude: <500 metres >559 Kilometres

Cost: <$15,000USD? > $2.5 BILLION & counting

Launch Mechanism: Mike (and car) Space Shuttle Discovery

Propellant: Beer Liquid Hydrocarbon

Comparison between the two images: PRICELESS

I for one, enjoyed that comparison, a lot.

Thanks Mike, its amazing just how much you can see and capture from EARTH compared to a MULTI BILLION dollar project that probably no one we know will ever get to drive themselves.

Astronomy is great, aint it?

Cheers

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-07-2009, 07:16 AM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
What's amazing is how far those stars have moved. Or, am I completely off-base, and, in actuality what we're seeing is parallax?

Regards,
Humayun
That's what I was thinking as well Humayun. Very good shot Mike.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 09-07-2009, 09:59 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Screwdriverone View Post
A few facts to consider here;

Image on the Left Image on the Right

Author: Mike Sidonio (Aus) Hubble/Nasa/ESA....US etc

People involved: 1 >5000

Aperture used: 150mm & 80mm 2400mm

Weight: <100kg (scope, not u) 11,170kg (11 tonnes)

Speed: 0 km/h 27,000 km/h

Technology: Refractor & CCD RC Cassegrain & WFC

Altitude: <500 metres >559 Kilometres

Cost: <$15,000USD? > $2.5 BILLION & counting

Launch Mechanism: Mike (and car) Space Shuttle Discovery

Propellant: Beer Liquid Hydrocarbon

Comparison between the two images: PRICELESS

I for one, enjoyed that comparison, a lot.

Thanks Mike, its amazing just how much you can see and capture from EARTH compared to a MULTI BILLION dollar project that probably no one we know will ever get to drive themselves.

Astronomy is great, aint it?

Cheers

Chris
Very funny Chris

The Hubble ultra deep fields alone have been worth the 10's of $billion spent so far though. The idea of staring at the same tiny area of sky for days or weeks at a time to peer farther and farther back in time so that what would otherwise be a pretty empty piece of sky from Earth becomes full of thousands of remote galaxies forming just after the Big Bang...is certainly priceless

Arrr chooo...sniff sniff hack...
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-07-2009, 10:52 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,484
Not that comparing ground based data with the HST is ever going to be fair, but I also figure you need to give the HST people their due and at least compare data at the same res as the Hubble shot....ie don't down sample.

This roll-over keeps the HST data in its native res...

http://www.atscope.com.au/BRO/m16fullres.html

Hope your cold gets better soon Mike.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-07-2009, 10:59 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Not that comparing ground based data with the HST is ever going to be fair, but I also figure you need to give the HST people their due and at least compare data at the same res as the Hubble shot....ie don't down sample.

This roll-over keeps the HST data in its native res...

http://www.atscope.com.au/BRO/m16fullres.html

Hope your cold gets better soon Mike.
Now THAT'S a true "fickle finger"

Great comparison Peter wish I could do roll overs on my site, very cool.

Makes it easier to find the details in my version...isn't Hubble the coolest scope?

Yes hope I get better soon too, I am sick of coughing up Freds narrow band images

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-07-2009, 11:18 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,484
With Hubble's servicing mission 4 completed, future HST imagery should be
decidedly more spectacular as the new Wide field camera 3 was installed..being several generations ahead of the camera used for "that" M16
image.

What does the WFC3 look like?

http://www.atscope.com.au/BRO/tutorials/WFC3.jpg

(Just a little bigger than the new camera I'm expecting to arrive in a month or so )
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-07-2009, 11:32 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691


Quote:
(Just a little bigger than the new camera I'm expecting to arrive in a month or so )
Ah yes, receieving a big new camera in the mail is very exciting!

http://www.pbase.com/strongmanmike2002/proline_arrives

Think I am due for that feeling again....

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 09-07-2009, 11:18 PM
MrB's Avatar
MrB (Simon)
Old Man Yells at Cloud

MrB is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rockingham WA
Posts: 3,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Haha, thats one of best laughs I've had in a while.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement