Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 18-06-2009, 11:33 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Nice Doug. Looks like you got there in the end. Sounds like the smoke affected subs might have been your pay-back for not suffering enough in the cold outside......
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 19-06-2009, 12:23 AM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff
Starry Eyed

Jeff is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wonga Park
Posts: 692
Nice work Doug.

I made a coupe of mournful attempts at M16 late last year, but I must have another crack at it (if I can brave the cold ) after seeing your results. Nicely captured and processed ... as usual.

Cheers,
Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 19-06-2009, 11:05 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Nice image Doug. I generally aim for 15 shots to get nice depth to my images. I don't always get 15 of course but I always set it for that.

I think you might want to address the slightly oval stars though. Is this flexure or is the camera slightly off from square? It is not much but I reckon you would see it in the full size images a fair bit. In the end it is the minor things that start to matter once the basics have been mastered.

Pity you were not able to get more data.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 19-06-2009, 05:38 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
nice story and result
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 19-06-2009, 06:56 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Thanks for all the comments. I seem to have some form of guiding problems that I don't seem to be able to quantify. Some times things just go all over, other times PHD just locks up and requires a full restart.
I really don't seem to be able to pin it down at all. The small variation in star shape seems to be the result of some of these problems. Sometime I will manage to work out this problem and get it working better although guiding at 1800mm is at best dificult.
Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 19-06-2009, 07:17 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Tis a nice shot Doug, I'd be *happy* with that. Pity about losing so many subs, but I'm sure you'll grab more later and re-process.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 20-06-2009, 09:38 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpastern View Post
Tis a nice shot Doug, I'd be *happy* with that. Pity about losing so many subs, but I'm sure you'll grab more later and re-process.

Dave
Thanks Dave, I doubt I will add to this one. With the elongation of the stars and problems I had with this one I think the next image of this target will be a new one with a few things a little better. ( Not a fan of Repros', once done best left.)Unless the original data is excelent.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement