Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 23-05-2009, 07:52 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar View Post
Very nice rendition Baz. 4.5 hrs seems an awfully long exposure on this target.
Thanks Doug.

I have noticed that when I am limited to shorter exposures, I have to stretch them too much to bring out the desired effect. Then I have to use post-processing tricks to smooth the artifacts out. Noise reduction etc.

Now that I am taking very long subs, (15 minutes) and many more of them, with lots of flats and lots more darks, the result is a LOT LESS playing around with the image, giving it a much more natural feel.

I reckon the less you have to do to an image after you have taken it, the better.

Baz.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 24-05-2009, 01:08 AM
Robbie
JAFO

Robbie is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Perth West Aussie
Posts: 183
Nice Image, great FOV, my favorite target
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 25-05-2009, 09:50 PM
CoolhandJo's Avatar
CoolhandJo (Paul)
Registered User

CoolhandJo is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,816
Very pretty - well centred - wide field

great.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement