Quote:
Originally Posted by merlin8r
This is true.
My point however was that if you did a two star alignment, then drift aligned, your 2 star alignment was now incorrect.
|
If your first alignment was an accurate two star alignment it will have established the attitude of the telescope as in the alt/azm mode as if it is in fact polar aligned and a drift alignment would have shown this to be correct.
In establishing the same atitude by drift alignment it should have now positioned the azimuth/RA axis passing through the poles as in a polar alignment exactly the same. From here there is nothing to be gained by doing the alignment again just ensure the telescope is in polar mode then do a goto and sync on a star. The scope will then be aligned. If there is a discrepancy between the methods the problem is not the alignment method but the mechanics of the scope.
The problem that most people have is that the telescope axes are not orthogonal. In this case you will never get a stable alignment. The so called two star alignment you want to do will seek to put the scope pack to where you started before the drift alignment and if you try a drift alignment it will have moved and need to be done again. You will be continually chasing your tail.
When I have "supercharged" and orthogonal aligned Paul's LX200 ask him how is alignments work. He will have his pier and permanent wedge spot on and his gotos will be excellent. Not being able to see the south celestial pole will not be a problem.
Baz