Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 09-04-2009, 01:15 AM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
As much as it may frustrate many scientists ethics commitees are as much a part of Science as the scientific method itself and simply adds to the excitment of it all. If science claims to work for the advancement of humanity, it follows then that it should also listen to the concerns of humanity. In the end most things get done.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 16-04-2009, 07:11 PM
dolphinx
Registered User

dolphinx is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Coonabarabran
Posts: 3
I'd have to say I'm an Einstein, myself. Science doesn't operate in a vacuum, nor should it.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 16-04-2009, 07:23 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Neither. I'm a VB guy Life's too short
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 16-04-2009, 09:21 PM
Archy (George)
Registered User

Archy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by yinyang23 View Post
I am doing year 12 physics and we recently researched the views of two famous scientists (Max Planck and Albert Einstein) regarding what we as humans should and should not do in the name of science.

Planck's view was that science should be studied for science's sake. To put it another way; If a question is asked science should answer it, or at least attempt to.

Einstein agreed that science should attempt to benefit the human race, however not if it involved some negative consequences.

Two examples of scientific research which were (and still are) highly controversial are the development of the atom bomb and stem cell research which raise questions of moral and ethical nature such as: what is the value placed on human life?

I personally am an Einstein, so the question I'm asking is are you a Planck, an Einstein or someone different altogether.
Re: "Einstein agreed that science should attempt to benefit the human race, however not if it involved some negative consequences." As Einstein wrote the letter to President Roosevelt that led to the development and use of the Atom Bomb, we should not believe that Einstein actually meant what is quoted, unless he regarded Germans and Japanese as not being humans and that would put him beyond the pale.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 19-04-2009, 10:39 AM
Zaps
Registered User

Zaps is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 349
Religion and politics have done far more harm than Science ever has.

The so-called "negative consequences of science" have only ever occurred because the religious and the political exploited science for their own despicable ends.

Compare the Scientific Method with the biased and emotive practices and mindsets of religious and political people and it's easy to see where Humanity is going wrong.

Let science be-and-do science, and start reigning-in the lunatic control freaks who obsess about controlling the rest of us.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 21-04-2009, 11:17 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,280
Someone once said I was thick as a a a Planck
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 21-04-2009, 12:56 PM
lacad01's Avatar
lacad01 (Adam)
The sky is Messier here!

lacad01 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Darwin
Posts: 2,587
I'll drink to that....with Ein-stein of bier, bitte
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement