Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 13-03-2009, 02:44 PM
JethroB76's Avatar
JethroB76 (Jeff)
Registered User

JethroB76 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tassie
Posts: 1,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
My main gripe with barlows would be that they add a lot of length or bulk to whats hanging out of the focuser particularly the 2"ers..

I use a type 1 13mm Nagler with a two inch GSO Barlow on my 16" scope and have no problem whatsoever
The eyepiece and the Barlow weigh about half a kilo.
Anyone who has looked through the scope with this combination has just said WOW
As I said I have no problem with barlow performance; I've been very happy with my 13mm Ethos in my 2" barlow, but it is still a huge contraption hanging out of the focuser, I feel like I need to check that the thumbscrews are tight every few minutes
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 13-03-2009, 02:48 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Go to a 16" and it wont seem so bad
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 13-03-2009, 04:24 PM
JethroB76's Avatar
JethroB76 (Jeff)
Registered User

JethroB76 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tassie
Posts: 1,105
nah, 20" is the next step
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 14-03-2009, 09:19 AM
KaStern
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello Phil,

I find a well-made barlow to be a very useful equipment, with my Newtonians.
My Newts are a 8"f/6 ATM Dob and a 4,5" f/4 Newt.

I do never use a barlow with my 80mm f/18,25 Refractor and my 6"f/12 Yolo.

The f/ratio of the scope is an inportant factor to be considered.

Let us assume you own a fastish f/4 Newt with decent optical quality,
you have him well collimated and you want to reach high powers on a
night with good seeing conditions.

The scope will allow you to use 0,7mm exit pupil, magnification will be
about Diameter of the optics in mm x 1,4 or even x 1,5
You would have to take a 2,8mm eyepiece to achieve this magnification(!)
Or you take a 2,5x Barlow plus a 7mm eyepiece,
or 3x Barlow plus a 8,4mm eyepiece.

The eye reliev of the simple eyepieces like Plössl, Abbe Ortho, RKE, Kellner
is about 2/3 of the eyepieces focal length.
Eyerelief of a 2,8mm Plössl would be extraordinary short.
The shortest Plössl and Abbe Orthos I know have 4mm f.l.
eyerelief is around 3mm and you have to pres your eyeball onto the eye-lens
of th eyepiece to see the whole field of view. A 9mm or 8mm eyepiece
is way more comfortable.

For high mags with ma 112/450mm Newt or 200/1200mm ATM Dobsonian
I regularily take a 3x Televue Barlow or a 2,8x Univesity Optics Klee Barlow
and some 13mm, 12,5m 12mm and 11mm quality Plössl/Ortho/RKE eyepieces.

A single 4mm Ortho shows blown-up stars at the edge of field,
whereas
a 12,5mm Orth or 12mm RKE with one of the Barlows does not show
any edge star degradation.

One downside is that the exit pupil is moved further out if a barlow is used.
That is fine with short focal length Orthos/Plössl/RKE/Kellner, but it can be
disgusting with long focal length eyepieces and shorty barlows.

Greetings , Karsten
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement