Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 19-02-2009, 09:16 PM
JethroB76's Avatar
JethroB76 (Jeff)
Registered User

JethroB76 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tassie
Posts: 1,104
Quote:
How much are you planning to sell it for?
haha get in line Brian
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 19-02-2009, 09:27 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miaplacidus View Post
Congratulations, H0ughy. Very tasty looking scope. Will be very interested to hear the first light report.

How much are you planning to sell it for?

Cheers,

Brian.
thanks, yep will be a careful report- might even rope in a few pro opinionated astrophotographers.

yours if you want it, just give me 4k
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 19-02-2009, 09:28 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by casstony View Post
The LS50 can be used on other refractors but the adapter plate is quite expensive ($300 or so for the ed80/ed100). I opted for two LS50's on an ED80 simply because they were available well before the 60mm double stacked units. I like the portability and clean lines of Houghy's scope.
did you get the bf600 or 1200?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 19-02-2009, 10:16 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by spacezebra View Post
Hi David

Congrats on the new equipment.

Secret location, very funny - I thought that you have changed occupations.


Cheers Petra d.
yes petra i too have dark secrets i could never do Al's job, but he could probably handle mine after all we are all clowns in the public service. thenks for the well wishes
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 19-02-2009, 10:49 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Looks a nice scope David. Of note and what I think is pretty important here is the the focus mechanism. My SM60 double stack has a helical focusor which is good but the focusor on the Lunt looks very nice. Second thing that I find attractive is that there is no central obstruction to the Lunt etalons. The band adjuster is there but it does not rely on a pivot point to center like the Coronado's. This means theoretically that contrast should be better overall.

A double stacked version would be good to do a review. I chose the 0.5 angstrom unit for surface detail and increased active region detailing. Although at present the sun is very quiet and not showing much activity.

Nice unit and I wish you all the luck with it. If I lived in your area I would like to see what the baby can do and do a direct comparison between the SM60 and the Lunt.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 19-02-2009, 11:05 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Finally! Woo Hoo!
Congratulations David.
If you ever need somewhere to stash it, I'll PM you my address.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 19-02-2009, 11:19 PM
Quark's Avatar
Quark (Trevor)
Registered User

Quark is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Broken Hill NSW Australia
Posts: 4,104
Damn fine looking instrument there David,

looking forward to seeing some images through it.

Regards
Trevor

Last edited by Quark; 19-02-2009 at 11:20 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 19-02-2009, 11:24 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjjnettie View Post
Finally! Woo Hoo!
Congratulations David.
If you ever need somewhere to stash it, I'll PM you my address.
too late - I already know where you live
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 19-02-2009, 11:27 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quark View Post
Damn fine looking instrument there David,

looking forward to seeing some images through it.

Regards
Trevor
I hope so too - i just found out it had a camera tripod hole - so a quick setup for a look on the tripod is at hand
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (_IGP6582.jpg)
91.9 KB37 views
Click for full-size image (_IGP6583.jpg)
100.8 KB29 views
Click for full-size image (_IGP6573.jpg)
102.8 KB28 views
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 19-02-2009, 11:37 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
Looks a nice scope David. Of note and what I think is pretty important here is the the focus mechanism. My SM60 double stack has a helical focusor which is good but the focusor on the Lunt looks very nice. Second thing that I find attractive is that there is no central obstruction to the Lunt etalons. The band adjuster is there but it does not rely on a pivot point to center like the Coronado's. This means theoretically that contrast should be better overall.

A double stacked version would be good to do a review. I chose the 0.5 angstrom unit for surface detail and increased active region detailing. Although at present the sun is very quiet and not showing much activity.

Nice unit and I wish you all the luck with it. If I lived in your area I would like to see what the baby can do and do a direct comparison between the SM60 and the Lunt.
LOL no way will i send it down to you Paul took too long to get here in the first place. as for the focuser here are some better images. I hope to band together Scott Alder, Paul Mayo and Mike Sidonio and get their opinions on this after I have my first drool

Also i attatched the etalon for the first time - fits well and screwed onto the main scope very well.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (_IGP6560.jpg)
196.3 KB46 views
Click for full-size image (_IGP6572.jpg)
174.5 KB44 views
Click for full-size image (_IGP6574.jpg)
107.4 KB39 views
Click for full-size image (_IGP6575.jpg)
162.6 KB42 views
Click for full-size image (_IGP6578.jpg)
132.6 KB45 views
Click for full-size image (_IGP6581.jpg)
85.2 KB41 views
Click for full-size image (_IGP6567.jpg)
114.9 KB43 views
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 19-02-2009, 11:45 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
have some better shots of the scope here. the tripod adapter in the previous post was not part of the lunt package. the clamshell is very well made. The SOL finder is an extra and i got that from BINTEL
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (_IGP6569.jpg)
102.6 KB26 views
Click for full-size image (_IGP6565.jpg)
148.6 KB25 views
Click for full-size image (_IGP6563.jpg)
119.6 KB22 views
Click for full-size image (_IGP6559.jpg)
85.9 KB26 views
Click for full-size image (_IGP6567.jpg)
114.9 KB26 views
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 20-02-2009, 12:16 AM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
did you get the bf600 or 1200?
I got both since I purchased the filters individually rather than getting a matched set. The bf1200 is nicer to use with it's wider field. The two unmatched filters work well with a dramatic improvement in visibility of detail over a single filter. The single filter actually provides most of the detail that the double stack does, but the detail is obvious through the double stack whereas you have to work hard to see it through the single filter. Curious to hear your impressions of single versus double stack. A bit more solar activity would be nice.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 20-02-2009, 09:39 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by casstony View Post
I got both since I purchased the filters individually rather than getting a matched set. The bf1200 is nicer to use with it's wider field. The two unmatched filters work well with a dramatic improvement in visibility of detail over a single filter. The single filter actually provides most of the detail that the double stack does, but the detail is obvious through the double stack whereas you have to work hard to see it through the single filter. Curious to hear your impressions of single versus double stack. A bit more solar activity would be nice.
moreactivity would be nice. Looking forward to the Venus transit in 2012
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 20-02-2009, 10:37 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,524
Excellent Davo, congrats mate, looking forward to having a squiz next time we get together.

Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 20-02-2009, 12:22 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by RB View Post
Excellent Davo, congrats mate, looking forward to having a squiz next time we get together.

sure thing Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 20-02-2009, 11:31 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
OK rushed home this afternoon, got it out and then realised - i need 1.25" EP's. i went pale - i knew i had some - just where, LOL i haven't used an eyepiece in years to observe through. well i found a 40mm one (better than nothing. just using the the 40 (OK need to find the others) i was pleasantly surprised - i couldn't see any prominences but i was able to get some surface detail. Very promising
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 20-02-2009, 11:36 PM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,524
Couldn't you find your 9mm reticle?
You probably left it in your guide scope LOL !!!!

Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 20-02-2009, 11:51 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by RB View Post
Couldn't you find your 9mm reticle?
You probably left it in your guide scope LOL !!!!

LOL no that was in the 127ED case
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 21-02-2009, 07:18 AM
alan meehan's Avatar
alan meehan (Alan)
Registered User

alan meehan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: maryland newcastle AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,847
I had a quick look through this scope yesterday, and i got to say its magic it is very well made and well worth the wait cant wait to put a camera on it,unfortunatly the sun seems to have dissappeared for who knows how long...
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 21-02-2009, 11:10 AM
Miaplacidus's Avatar
Miaplacidus (Brian)
He used to cut the grass.

Miaplacidus is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 1,235
I should know better, I guess, but can you use binoviewers with this Lunt?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement