Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 06-01-2009, 10:28 AM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
... Dan i think Ian robertson is right... that guy isn't distinguished enough, i mean i belive that he would be struggling to understand how to attach a wing on a paper aeroplane!!! pffft, I think ide be good for the role!

HAZZZZAAAR!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-01-2009, 11:02 AM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmitchell82 View Post
... Dan i think Ian robertson is right... that guy isn't distinguished enough, i mean i belive that he would be struggling to understand how to attach a wing on a paper aeroplane!!! pffft, I think ide be good for the role!

HAZZZZAAAR!
Oh, he's distinguished enough....you only have to look at his academic and professional credentials. What's most important is whether he's a "yes" man, or his independent and will speak his own mind when and where he needs to. Even if that means he upsets a few pollies and beaurocrats in the process.

We don't need a "yes" man at the head of NASA.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-01-2009, 03:10 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
The BIG question is has he been a YESMAN in his current tenure???????
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-01-2009, 06:47 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
I haven't been following the news at NASA lately to be able to figure that one out, but I can imagine any Bush appointee being a yes man to some extent.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-01-2009, 07:09 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
"It aint neccesraly so" mr Gates as defence secratery is being used by Obama and so area number of former bush appointees.
As you say , you have not been following what has been happening so you can not pass judgment, and say he is a yes man.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-01-2009, 07:14 PM
leinad's Avatar
leinad (Dan)
Registered User

leinad is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 1,307
..and an Obama appointee not being a yes man?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-01-2009, 07:25 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
leinad, have you/do you work for a boss, if so do you say NO to him/her?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-01-2009, 08:27 PM
leinad's Avatar
leinad (Dan)
Registered User

leinad is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 1,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
leinad, have you/do you work for a boss, if so do you say NO to him/her?
Meaning?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-01-2009, 08:38 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by leinad View Post
Meaning?
If you don't understand the inference, it is not worth continuing.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-01-2009, 08:55 PM
leinad's Avatar
leinad (Dan)
Registered User

leinad is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 1,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
If you don't understand the inference, it is not worth continuing.
Yeah, understood. Just that I wouldnt mind further elaboration.

edit: LOL, I think I threw the thread off-topic myself.

Whatever the outcome, and if they do proceed with the idea, I hope that international co-operative space exploration will prevail in the future to benefit 'all', no matter who gets there first.

Last edited by leinad; 06-01-2009 at 10:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 11-01-2009, 05:20 PM
dalemadison's Avatar
dalemadison
Registered User

dalemadison is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ringwood East, VIC
Posts: 44
As someone who spent 20 years working in the US Air Force 'space business' you'd be surprised how much overlap there currently is. Most of Cape Canaveral is run by the Air Force. The adaptive optics used at places like Keck was developed to track and photograph satellites in the 1980s. As for man-rated rockets, you could just re-engineer the current Delta and Atlas heavy lift vehicles. Remember in the 60s, Mercury and Gemini were launched on re-engineered ICBMs. In these days of fiscal constraints using economies of scale might not be all bad
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-01-2009, 02:29 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
On second thoughts, Obama does want Yes men/women,"Yes We Can Men and Women"
President Kennedy said "we will go to the Moon" a lot of doubters said NO we can't, but a lot of others said YES we can and they did
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 15-01-2009, 11:31 AM
leinad's Avatar
leinad (Dan)
Registered User

leinad is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 1,307
http://www.space.com/news/090113-oba...nistrator.html

WASHINGTON - U.S. President-elect Barack Obama has asked retired Air Force Maj. Gen. Scott Gration, one of his top foreign policy and military advisers during his campaign, to take the helm of NASA, according to a source informed of the selection.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 15-01-2009, 08:06 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
We'll see just how well this appointee goes and what the future holds for NASA, but I'm not that too optimistic. But then again, he may surprise us all.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 16-01-2009, 11:12 PM
mabsj2's Avatar
mabsj2
Joash

mabsj2 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: some where far away.
Posts: 58
it would be better if they just shared Technologies among each other. totally merging the two organizations is not a good idea considering the interests of both organizations.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 16-01-2009, 11:15 PM
mabsj2's Avatar
mabsj2
Joash

mabsj2 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: some where far away.
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by leinad View Post
Yeah, understood. Just that I wouldnt mind further elaboration.

edit: LOL, I think I threw the thread off-topic myself.

Whatever the outcome, and if they do proceed with the idea, I hope that international co-operative space exploration will prevail in the future to benefit 'all', no matter who gets there first.
Totally agree
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement